Differences between revisions 5 and 11 (spanning 6 versions)
Revision 5 as of 2010-08-25 21:00:39
Size: 4908
Editor: GreyCat
Comment: typo
Revision 11 as of 2012-03-09 17:18:49
Size: 9437
Editor: Lhunath
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
Quoting in shell programming is extremely important. There are multiple types of quotes, and you must know how and when to use each type. In many languages, quotes are mainly used to specify that the enclosed text is to be interpreted as a string datatype, but in shell programming almost everything is a string, so quoting in the shell has other functions, does much more. There are multiple types of quotes which serve primarily to enable different ways of interpreting their contents. Unfortunately, the rules are often hard for beginners to learn and their behavior varies by context with several special cases and exceptions to remember. Also unfortunately, '''quoting in shell programming is ''extremely'' important'''. It's something no one can avoid learning. Improper shell quoting is one of the most common sources of scripting bugs and security issues. Fortunately, it's possible to get it right most of the time by following a few guidelines, but do not guess about quoting. When in doubt, test, and read the man page for how quotes are to be interpreted in a given context.
Line 3: Line 3:
= Standard quoting = == Types of quoting ==
Line 5: Line 5:
A shell command is parsed by the shell into words, using whitespace (regardless of the [[IFS]] variable) and other shell metacharacters. The first function of quoting is to permit words to contain these metacharacters.  * '''Single quotes:''' (apostrophes) prevent all special interpretation of the characters between them. Everything between single quotes is literal and expands to a single word. The only thing which cannot be single-quoted is a single quote itself.

 * '''Double quotes:''' permit parameter expansions, [[ArithmeticExpression|arithmetic expansions]] and [[CommandSubstitution|command substitutions]] to occur inside them. They do not allow [[glob|filename expansions]], brace expansions, [[ProcessSubstitution|process substitutions]], tilde expansion, etc. In short, any substitution that starts with `$` is evaluated, and also {{{`}}} for legacy compatibility. The most important function of double-quotes is their effect on [[ParameterExpansion|parameter expansions]], where they disable subjecting the results to pathname expansion and word splitting, and depending on the type of parameter, affect the number of resulting words.

 * '''$'...' and $"...":''' Bash introduces two additional forms of quoting -- single and double quotes preceded by a ''$'' sign. Of these,`$'...'` is the most common, and acts just like single quotes except that backslash-escaped combinations are expanded as specified by the ANSI C standard. This allows a convenient way to embed nonprintable characters into strings, or to pass them as arguments. The second form is `$"..."` and is used for [[BashFAQ/098|localization support]]. Neither of these are specified or mentioned by POSIX, but at least the `$'...'` variety is widely supported by Bash, Ksh93, and relatives.

Note: Although backticks ({{{`}}}) are a type of quotes linguistically, they don't actually "quote" anything in bash. Where quoting in bash is used to make data (partly) literal, backticks do something entirely different. They're the old Bourne syntax for [[CommandSubstitution|command substitution]]. They ''mostly'' do the same thing as `$(...)`, but there are a [[BashFAQ/082|handful of weird exceptions]]. Either way, it doesn't matter that much: Their use is deprecated in favor of `$(...)`, and you really shouldn't see these things anymore in modern or maintained bash code. Take away from this that if you see them, they do NOT void the need for quoting (just like `"$(command)"`, you should double-quote them: {{{"`command`"}}}), and you should probably just replace them with `$()`.

== Purposes of Quoting ==

A shell command is parsed by the shell into words, using whitespace (regardless of the [[IFS]] variable) and other shell metacharacters. '''The first function of quoting is to permit words to contain these metacharacters.'''
Line 13: Line 23:
The quotes are not actually passed along to the command. They are removed by the shell. In the example above, the `echo` command sees ''only'' the `&`, not the quotes. The quotes are not actually passed along to the command. They are removed by the shell (this process is cleverly called "quote removal"). In the example above, the `echo` command sees ''only'' the `&`, not the quotes.
Line 15: Line 25:
'''Single quotes''' (apostrophes) prevent all interpretation of the characters between them.

'''Double quotes''' permit parameter expansions, [[ArithmeticExpression|arithmetic expansions]] and [[CommandSubstitution|command substitutions]] to occur inside them. They do not allow [[glob|filename expansions]], brace expansions, [[ProcessSubstitution|process substitutions]], tilde expansion, etc. In short, any substitution that starts with `$` is allowed, and also {{{`}}} for legacy compatibility.

The second purpose of quoting is to prevent WordSplitting and [[glob|globbing]]. The value of a double-quoted substitution does ''not'' undergo any further processing. (An unquoted substitution ''does''.)
'''The second purpose of quoting is to prevent [[WordSplitting|word splitting]] and [[glob|globbing]].''' The result of a single-quoted or double-quoted substitution does ''not'' undergo any further processing. (The result of an unquoted substitution ''does''.)
Line 25: Line 31:
In this example, the double quotes protect each parameter (variable) from undergoing word splitting or globbing should it happen to contain whitespace or wildcard characters (`*` or `?` or `[...]`). Without the quotes, a `filename` like `hot stuff.mp3` would be split into two words, and each word would be passed to the `cp` command as a separate argument. Or, a `filename` that contains `*` with whitespace around it would produce one word for every file in the current directory. That is not what we want. In this example, the double quotes protect the value of each parameter (variable) from undergoing word splitting or globbing should it happen to contain whitespace or wildcard characters (`*` or `?` or `[...]`). Without the quotes, a `filename` like `hot stuff.mp3` would be split into two words, and each word would be passed to the `cp` command as a separate argument. Or, a `filename` that contains `*` with whitespace around it would produce one word for every file in the current directory. That is not what we want.
Line 29: Line 35:
When in doubt, quote your parameter expansions. It's rare that you would need one to be unquoted, and if that's the case, you'll know it. When in doubt, always double-quote your parameter expansions.
Line 31: Line 37:
Assorted examples, to show how things ''should'' be done. Some of these examples use bash/ksh syntax that won't work in strict POSIX shells. You may concatenate the various types of quoting if you need to. For example, if you have one section of a string that has lots of special characters that you'd like to single-quote, and another section with a parameter expansion in it which must be double-quoted, you may mix them:

{{{
echo '!%$*&'"$foo"
}}}

Any number of quoted substrings, of any style, may be concatenated in this manner. The result (after appropriate expansions in the double-quoted sections) is a single word.

Double-quoting `$@` or `${array[@]}` has a special meaning. `"$@"` expands to a list of words, with each positional parameter's value being one word. Likewise, `"${array[@]}"` expands to a list words, one per array element. When dealing with the positional parameters or with the contents of an array as a list of words, ''always'' use the double-quoted syntax.

Double-quoting `$*` or `${array[*]}` results in ''one word'' which is the concatenation of all the positional parameters (or array elements) with the first character of [[IFS]] between them. This is similar to the `join` function in some other languages, although the fact that you can only have a single join character can sometimes be a crippling limitation.

== Examples of Quoting ==

Here are some assorted examples, to show how things ''should'' be done. Some of these examples use bash/ksh syntax that won't work in strict POSIX shells.
Line 35: Line 55:

# Never use for file in $* or for file in $@
Line 42: Line 64:
for index in ${!array[*]}
# We omit quotes here because the indices are a list of numbers,
# which must be word-split in order to be processed. Numbers will
# never undergo glob expansion either, so we can skip "set -f".

# We could also write it this way, and it would still work:
# bash 3.0 and higher
Line 50: Line 67:
# The second version has the advantage of continuing to work if
# the array is an associative array rather than a normal array.
# This works with both regular and associative arrays. (Associative
# arrays require bash 4.0 or higher.)
Line 55: Line 72:
# bash or ksh93
Line 65: Line 83:
Line 67: Line 86:

echo "The matching line is: $(grep foo "$filename")"
                                       ^---------^ inner layer (quotes)
                            ^^--------------------^ middle layer (command sub)
     ^---------------------------------------------^ outer layer (quotes)

# Without the inner quotes, the value of $filename would be word-split and globbed
# before being handed to grep.
Line 69: Line 96:
The third type of quote is the '''backtick''' ({{{`}}}) or '''back quote'''. It's a deprecated markup for command substitutions, used in Bourne shells before the introduction of the `$(...)` syntax. For a discussion of the difference between {{{`...`}}} and `$(...)` please see [[BashFAQ/082]]. {{{
# bash
ip=192.168.1.30
netmask=255.255.254.0
IFS=. read -ra ip_octets <<< "$ip"
IFS=. read -ra netmask_octets <<< "$netmask"
for i in 0 1 2 3; do
  ((ip_octets[i] &= netmask_octets[i]))
done
IFS=.; network="${ip_octets[*]}"; unset IFS
}}}
Line 71: Line 108:
= Bash extensions =

Bash introduces two additional forms of quoting. The first is `$'...'` which acts like single quotes except that backslash-escaped combinations are expanded as specified by the ANSI C standard. This allows a convenient way to embed nonprintable characters into strings, or to pass them as arguments.
the `$'...'` quoting style is used to interpret backslash escapes.
Line 81: Line 115:
The second form is `$"..."` and is used for [[BashFAQ/098|localization support]]. {{{
echo $'It\'s also easier to escape apostrophes this way.'
}}}
Line 83: Line 119:
In addition to these, bash uses quotes to suppress the "specialness" of the right-hand-side of an `=` or `=~` operator inside a `[[` keyword. That sounds complicated, but it's simpler when shown as an example: {{{
# The following are all equivalent:
echo $'hi\nthere\n'
printf '%s\n' hi there
# discouraged:
echo -e 'hi\nthere\n'
# ksh93:
print 'hi\nthere\n'
}}}

== Exceptions ==

One important situation where quotes can have an unintended effect is in the case of [[glob|pattern matching]] contexts. Bash uses quotes to suppress the "specialness" of patterns and [[RegularExpression|regular expressions]]. Characters interpreted specially in a pattern matching context are treated literally when quoted whether the pattern is expanded from a parameter or not.
Line 100: Line 148:
See [[glob]] and RegularExpression for explanations of those terms. {{{
# Bash 4
# the "quoted" branch is taken.

g=a*[b]

case $g in
    "$g")
        echo 'quoted pattern'
        ;;&
    $g)
        echo 'unquoted pattern'
        ;;
esac
}}}

== See also ==
 * http://wiki.bash-hackers.org/syntax/quoting
 * http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_02

In many languages, quotes are mainly used to specify that the enclosed text is to be interpreted as a string datatype, but in shell programming almost everything is a string, so quoting in the shell has other functions, does much more. There are multiple types of quotes which serve primarily to enable different ways of interpreting their contents. Unfortunately, the rules are often hard for beginners to learn and their behavior varies by context with several special cases and exceptions to remember. Also unfortunately, quoting in shell programming is extremely important. It's something no one can avoid learning. Improper shell quoting is one of the most common sources of scripting bugs and security issues. Fortunately, it's possible to get it right most of the time by following a few guidelines, but do not guess about quoting. When in doubt, test, and read the man page for how quotes are to be interpreted in a given context.

Types of quoting

  • Single quotes: (apostrophes) prevent all special interpretation of the characters between them. Everything between single quotes is literal and expands to a single word. The only thing which cannot be single-quoted is a single quote itself.

  • Double quotes: permit parameter expansions, arithmetic expansions and command substitutions to occur inside them. They do not allow filename expansions, brace expansions, process substitutions, tilde expansion, etc. In short, any substitution that starts with $ is evaluated, and also ` for legacy compatibility. The most important function of double-quotes is their effect on parameter expansions, where they disable subjecting the results to pathname expansion and word splitting, and depending on the type of parameter, affect the number of resulting words.

  • $'...' and $"...": Bash introduces two additional forms of quoting -- single and double quotes preceded by a $ sign. Of these,$'...' is the most common, and acts just like single quotes except that backslash-escaped combinations are expanded as specified by the ANSI C standard. This allows a convenient way to embed nonprintable characters into strings, or to pass them as arguments. The second form is $"..." and is used for localization support. Neither of these are specified or mentioned by POSIX, but at least the $'...' variety is widely supported by Bash, Ksh93, and relatives.

Note: Although backticks (`) are a type of quotes linguistically, they don't actually "quote" anything in bash. Where quoting in bash is used to make data (partly) literal, backticks do something entirely different. They're the old Bourne syntax for command substitution. They mostly do the same thing as $(...), but there are a handful of weird exceptions. Either way, it doesn't matter that much: Their use is deprecated in favor of $(...), and you really shouldn't see these things anymore in modern or maintained bash code. Take away from this that if you see them, they do NOT void the need for quoting (just like "$(command)", you should double-quote them: "`command`"), and you should probably just replace them with $().

Purposes of Quoting

A shell command is parsed by the shell into words, using whitespace (regardless of the IFS variable) and other shell metacharacters. The first function of quoting is to permit words to contain these metacharacters.

echo '&'

Without quotes, the & would put the echo command into the background. With quotes, the & is simply made into a word, and passed as an argument to the echo command instead.

The quotes are not actually passed along to the command. They are removed by the shell (this process is cleverly called "quote removal"). In the example above, the echo command sees only the &, not the quotes.

The second purpose of quoting is to prevent word splitting and globbing. The result of a single-quoted or double-quoted substitution does not undergo any further processing. (The result of an unquoted substitution does.)

cp -- "$filename" "$destination"

In this example, the double quotes protect the value of each parameter (variable) from undergoing word splitting or globbing should it happen to contain whitespace or wildcard characters (* or ? or [...]). Without the quotes, a filename like hot stuff.mp3 would be split into two words, and each word would be passed to the cp command as a separate argument. Or, a filename that contains * with whitespace around it would produce one word for every file in the current directory. That is not what we want.

With the quotes, every character in the value of the filename parameter is treated literally, and the whole value becomes the second argument to the cp command.

When in doubt, always double-quote your parameter expansions.

You may concatenate the various types of quoting if you need to. For example, if you have one section of a string that has lots of special characters that you'd like to single-quote, and another section with a parameter expansion in it which must be double-quoted, you may mix them:

echo '!%$*&'"$foo"

Any number of quoted substrings, of any style, may be concatenated in this manner. The result (after appropriate expansions in the double-quoted sections) is a single word.

Double-quoting $@ or ${array[@]} has a special meaning. "$@" expands to a list of words, with each positional parameter's value being one word. Likewise, "${array[@]}" expands to a list words, one per array element. When dealing with the positional parameters or with the contents of an array as a list of words, always use the double-quoted syntax.

Double-quoting $* or ${array[*]} results in one word which is the concatenation of all the positional parameters (or array elements) with the first character of IFS between them. This is similar to the join function in some other languages, although the fact that you can only have a single join character can sometimes be a crippling limitation.

Examples of Quoting

Here are some assorted examples, to show how things should be done. Some of these examples use bash/ksh syntax that won't work in strict POSIX shells.

for file in "$@"

# Never use  for file in $*  or  for file in $@

for element in "${array[@]}"

# bash 3.0 and higher
for index in "${!array[@]}"

# This works with both regular and associative arrays.  (Associative
# arrays require bash 4.0 or higher.)

# bash or ksh93
find_opts=('(' -iname '*.jpg' -o -iname '*.gif' -o -iname '*.png' ')')
find . "${find_opts[@]}" -print

echo 'Don'\''t walk!'

echo "The matching line is: $(grep foo "$filename")"

# Note that the quotes inside the $() command substitution are nested.
# This looks wrong to a C programmer, but it is correct in shells.

echo "The matching line is: $(grep foo "$filename")"
                                       ^---------^    inner layer (quotes)
                            ^^--------------------^   middle layer (command sub)
     ^---------------------------------------------^  outer layer (quotes)

# Without the inner quotes, the value of $filename would be word-split and globbed
# before being handed to grep.

# bash
ip=192.168.1.30
netmask=255.255.254.0
IFS=. read -ra ip_octets <<< "$ip"
IFS=. read -ra netmask_octets <<< "$netmask"
for i in 0 1 2 3; do
  ((ip_octets[i] &= netmask_octets[i]))
done
IFS=.; network="${ip_octets[*]}"; unset IFS

the $'...' quoting style is used to interpret backslash escapes.

IFS=$' \t\n'
# sets the IFS variable to the three-byte string containing
# a space, a tab, and a newline

echo $'It\'s also easier to escape apostrophes this way.'

# The following are all equivalent:
echo $'hi\nthere\n'
printf '%s\n' hi there
# discouraged:
echo -e 'hi\nthere\n'
# ksh93:
print 'hi\nthere\n'

Exceptions

One important situation where quotes can have an unintended effect is in the case of pattern matching contexts. Bash uses quotes to suppress the "specialness" of patterns and regular expressions. Characters interpreted specially in a pattern matching context are treated literally when quoted whether the pattern is expanded from a parameter or not.

if [[ $path = foo* ]]; then
# unquoted foo* acts as a glob

if [[ $path = "foo*" ]]; then
# quoted "foo*" is a literal string

if [[ $path =~ $some_re ]]; then
# the contents of $some_re are treated as an ERE

if [[ $path =~ "$some_re" ]]; then
# the contents of $some_re are treated as a literal string
# despite the =~ operator

# Bash 4
# the "quoted" branch is taken.

g=a*[b]

case $g in
    "$g")
        echo 'quoted pattern'
        ;;&
    $g)
        echo 'unquoted pattern'
        ;;
esac

See also


CategoryShell

Quotes (last edited 2024-03-07 22:57:49 by emanuele6)