12298
Comment: note names=([i]="foo") and names[i]="foo" syntax
|
18698
a simple cheatsheet up front
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
<<Anchor(Patterns)>> | ## page was renamed from BashGuide/05.Arrays [[BashGuide/Patterns|<- Patterns]] | [[BashGuide/TestsAndConditionals|Tests and Conditionals ->]] ---- |
Line 3: | Line 6: |
Line 6: | Line 8: |
Strings are without a doubt the most used parameter type. But they are also the most mis-used parameter type. It is important to remember that a string holds just '''one''' element. Capturing the output of a command, for instance, and putting it in a string parameter means that parameter holds just '''one''' string of characters. Whether that string represents twenty filenames, twenty numbers or twenty names of people. And as is always the case when you put multiple items in a single string: these multiple items are somehow delimited from each other. We, humans, can usually decipher which the different filenames are when looking at a string. We assume that, perhaps, each line in the string represents a filename. Or each word represents a filename. While this assumption is understandable, it is also inheritly flawed: Each single filename can contain every character you might want to use to separate the filenames from each other in a string. That means there's technically no telling where the first filename in the string ends, because there's no character that can say: "I denote the end of this filename" because that character itself could be part of the filename. |
Strings are without a doubt the most used parameter type. But they are also the most misused parameter type. It is important to remember that a string holds just '''one''' element. Capturing the output of a command, for instance, and putting it in a string parameter means that parameter holds just '''one''' string of characters, regardless of whether that string represents twenty filenames, twenty numbers or twenty names of people. And as is always the case when you put multiple items in a single string, these multiple items must be somehow delimited from each other. We, as humans, can usually decipher what the different filenames are when looking at a string. We assume that, perhaps, each line in the string represents a filename, or each word represents a filename. While this assumption is understandable, it is also inherently flawed. Each single filename can contain every character you might want to use to separate the filenames from each other in a string. That means there's technically no telling where the first filename in the string ends, because there's no character that can say: "I denote the end of this filename" because that character itself could be part of the filename. |
Line 13: | Line 15: |
$ files=$(ls); cp $files /backups/ }}} This attempt at backing up our files in the current directory is flawed. We put the output of `ls` in a string called `files` and then use the '''unquoted''' `$files` parameter expansion to cut that string into arguments (relying on ''Word Splitting''). As mentioned before; argument and word splitting cuts a string into pieces wherever there is whitespace. Relying on it means we assume that none of our filenames will contain any whitespace. If they do, the filename will be cut in half or more. Conclusion: '''bad'''. |
# This does NOT work in the general case $ myfiles=$(ls); cp $files /backups/ }}} When this would probably be a better idea: {{{ # This DOES work in the general case $ myfiles }}} This attempt at backing up our files in the current directory is flawed. We put the output of `ls` in a string called `files` and then use the '''unquoted''' `$files` parameter expansion to cut that string into arguments (relying on ''Word Splitting''). As mentioned before, argument and word splitting cuts a string into pieces wherever there is whitespace. Relying on it means we assume that none of our filenames will contain any whitespace. If they do, the filename will be cut in half or more. Conclusion: '''bad'''. |
Line 20: | Line 28: |
For the best results and the least headaches, remember that if you have a list of things that you need to remember: Always put it in an array. Also note that since arrays map integers to strings you can't use them to do any other mapping. For instance, you cannot use strings as keys or other arrays as values. Usually, if you think you need something like this, you can change the logic of your script such that you don't need it anymore. If you can't, you should probably consider switching to a language that's built for this sort of job (perl, python, ruby) or use multiple arrays with a shared index in bash. |
For the best results and the least headaches, remember that if you have a list of things, you should always put it in an array. Unlike some other programming languages, bash does not offer lists, tuples, etc. Just arrays, and associative arrays (which are new in bash 4). |
Line 26: | Line 34: |
-------- |
-------- |
Line 31: | Line 37: |
Line 32: | Line 39: |
Line 40: | Line 46: |
Line 45: | Line 50: |
$# or... | # or... |
Line 48: | Line 53: |
When the elements in the arrays are filenames, then you'll probably want to use `Globs` in there: {{{ $ photos=(~/"My Photos"/*jpg) }}} |
Notice that there is a gap between indices 1 and 20 in this example. An array with holes in it is called a ''sparse array''. Bash allows this, and it can often be quite useful. If you want to fill an array with filenames, then you'll probably want to use ''Globs'' in there: {{{ $ photos=(~/"My Photos"/*.jpg) }}} |
Line 60: | Line 65: |
$ files=$(ls) # BAD, BAD, BAD! $ files=(*) # Good! }}} The first would create a '''string''' with the output of `ls`. That string cannot possibly be used safely for reasons mentioned in the `Arrays` introduction. The second statement gives us an array where each filename is a separate string. Perfect. Now, sometimes we want to build an array from a string or the output of a command. Commands (generally) just output strings: for instance, running a `find` command will enumerate filenames, and separate these filenames with newlines (putting each filename on a separate line). So to parse that one big string into an array we need to tell bash what character delimits the parts of the string that we want to put in separate array elements. That's what `IFS` is used for: |
$ files=$(ls) # BAD, BAD, BAD! $ files=($(ls)) # STILL BAD! $ files=(*) # Good! }}} The first would create a '''string''' with the output of `ls`. That string cannot possibly be used safely for reasons mentioned in the `Arrays` introduction. The second is closer, but it still splits up filenames with whitespace. The third statement gives us an array where each filename is a separate element. Perfect. ''This section that we're about to introduce contains some advanced concepts. If you get lost, you may want to return here after you've read the whole guide. You can skip ahead to [[#Using_Arrays|Using Arrays]] if you want to keep things simple.'' Now, sometimes we want to build an array from a string or the output of a command. Commands (generally) just output strings: for instance, running a `find` command will enumerate filenames, and separate these filenames with newlines (putting each filename on a separate line). So to parse that one big string into an array we need to tell bash where each element ends. (Note, this is a bad example, because filenames can '''contain''' a newline, so it is not safe to delimit them with newlines! But see below.) Breaking up a string is what `IFS` is used for: |
Line 73: | Line 80: |
Line 76: | Line 82: |
Very often, though, it's impossible to safely tell what the delimiter is. For instance, when `find` outputs filenames separated by a newline, using a newline to delimit our parsing of that output string is flawed in that a filename can itself contain a newline. We cannot assume that each newline means: "A new filename follows", which means we cannot parse the output safely. And if we can't even parse it safely, there's little point in parsing it badly and then putting it in a safe array: The array would just contain badly parsed data. The answer to this problem is `NULL` bytes. The main difference between strings and the output of commands is that the latter is a `stream`, not a string. Streams are just like strings with one big difference: They can contain `NULL` bytes, strings cannot. A `NULL` byte is a byte which is just all zeros: `00000000`. The reason that they can't be used in strings is an artifact of the `C` programming language: `NULL` bytes are used in your computer memory to mark the end of a string. That way, when you output a string, you don't output everything in your memory starting at the string's location until the end of your memory but just until it reaches a `NULL` byte. Streams '''can''' contain `NULL` bytes, and we will use them to delimit our data. Since strings can't contain `NULL` bytes, neither can filenames or anything else we may want to put in an array element. That makes it the perfect candidate for safe array creation. Usually, the command you want to read the output of has an option that makes it output its data separated by `NULL` bytes rather than newlines or something else. `find` has the option `-print0`, which we'll use in this example: |
(The builtin command `read` and the `<<<` operator will be covered in more depth in the [[BashGuide/InputAndOutput|Input and Output]] chapter.) We could do the same thing with a `find` command, by setting `IFS` to a newline. But then our script would fail when someone creates a filename with a newline in it (either accidentally or maliciously). So, is there any way to get a list of elements from an external program (like `find`) into a bash array? In general, the answer is yes, provided there is a reliable way to delimit the elements. In the specific case of filenames, the answer to this problem is NUL bytes. A NUL byte is a byte which is just all zeros: `00000000`. Bash strings can't contain NUL bytes, because of an artifact of the "C" programming language: NUL bytes are used in C to mark the end of a string. Since bash is written in C and uses C's native strings, it inherits that behavior. A data stream (like the output of a command, or a file) can contain NUL bytes. Streams are like strings with three big differences: they are read sequentially (you usually can't jump around); they're ''unidirectional'' (you can read from them, or write to them, but typically not both); and they can contain NUL bytes. File ''names'' cannot contain NUL bytes (since they're implemented as C strings by Unix), and neither can the vast majority of human-readable things we would want to store in a script (people's names, IP addresses, etc.). That makes NUL a great candidate for separating elements in a stream. Quite often, the command whose output you want to read will have an option that makes it output its data separated by NUL bytes rather than newlines or something else. `find` (on GNU and BSD, anyway) has the option `-print0`, which we'll use in this example: |
Line 88: | Line 100: |
This is the only safe way of parsing a command's output into a string. Understandably, it looks a little confusing and convoluted at first. So let's take it apart: We're using a `while` loop that runs a `read` command each time. The `read` command uses the `-d $'\0'` option, which means that instead of reading a line (up to a newline), we're reading up to a `NULL` byte (`\0`). Once `read` has read some data and encountered its `NULL` byte, the `while` loop's body is executed where we put what we read (which is in `REPLY`) into our array. To do this, we use the `+=()` syntax. This syntax adds an (or more) element(s) to the end of our array. Finally, the `< <(..)` syntax is a combination of ''File Redirection'' (`<`) and ''Process Substitution'' (`<(..)`) which is used to redirect the output of the `find` command into our `while` loop. The `find` command itself uses the `-print0` option as mentioned before to tell it to separate the filenames it finds with a `NULL` byte. -------- . '''Good Practice: <<BR>> Arrays are a safe list of strings. They are perfect for representing multiple filenames.<<BR>> Make sure to always use the `NULL`-byte method of parsing command output whenever you're parsing output that can contain any string character in each element.''' |
This is a safe way of parsing a command's output into strings. Understandably, it looks a little confusing and convoluted at first. So let's take it apart: The first line `files=()` creates an empty array named `files`. We're using a [[BashGuide/TestsAndConditionals#Conditional_Loops|while loop]] that runs a `read` command each time. The `read` command uses the `-d $'\0'` option, which means that instead of reading a line at a time (up to a newline), we're reading up to a NUL byte (`\0`). It also uses `-r` to prevent it from treating backslashes specially. Once `read` has read some data and encountered a NUL byte, the `while` loop's body is executed. We put what we read (which is in the parameter `REPLY`) into our array. To do this, we use the `+=()` syntax. This syntax adds one or more element(s) to the end of our array. Finally, the `< <(..)` syntax is a combination of ''File Redirection'' (`<`) and ''Process Substitution'' (`<(..)`). Omitting the technical details for now, we'll simply say that this is how we send the output of the `find` command into our `while` loop. The `find` command itself uses the `-print0` option as mentioned before to tell it to separate the filenames it finds with a NUL byte. -------- . '''Good Practice: <<BR>> Arrays are a safe list of strings. They are perfect for storing multiple filenames. <<BR>> If you have to parse a stream of data into component elements, there must be a way to tell where each element starts and ends. The NUL byte is very often the best choice for this job. <<BR>> If you have a list of things, keep it in list form as long as possible. Don't smash it into a string or a file until you absolutely have to. If you do have to write it out to a file and read it back in later, keep in mind the delimiter problem we mentioned above.''' |
Line 105: | Line 119: |
Line 106: | Line 121: |
. '''In the FAQ: <<BR>> [[BashFAQ/005|How can I use array variables?]]<<BR>> [[BashFAQ/006|How can I use variable variables (indirect variables, pointers, references) or associative arrays?]]''' -------- |
. '''In the FAQ: <<BR>> [[BashFAQ/005|How can I use array variables?]] <<BR>> [[BashFAQ/006|How can I use variable variables (indirect variables, pointers, references) or associative arrays?]] <<BR>> [[BashFAQ/020|How can I find and deal with file names containing newlines, spaces or both?]] <<BR>> [[BashFAQ/024|I set variables in a loop. Why do they suddenly disappear after the loop terminates? Or, why can't I pipe data to read?]]''' -------- |
Line 112: | Line 125: |
Line 113: | Line 127: |
Walking over array elements is really easy. Because arrays are such a safe medium of storage, we can simply use a `for` loop to iterate over its elements: |
Walking over array elements is really easy. Because an array is such a safe medium of storage, we can simply use a `for` loop to iterate over its elements: |
Line 121: | Line 134: |
Notice the syntax used to '''expand''' the array here. We use the '''quoted''' form: `"${arrayname[@]}"`. That causes bash to replace it with every single element in the array, properly quoted. For instance, these are identical: |
Notice the syntax used to '''expand''' the array here. We use the '''quoted''' form: `"${arrayname[@]}"`. That causes bash to replace it with every single element in the array, properly quoted. The following two examples have the same effect: |
Line 127: | Line 141: |
}}} {{{ |
|
Line 129: | Line 145: |
Remember to '''quote''' the `${arrayname[@]}` properly. If you don't you loose all benefit of using an array at all: You're telling bash it's OK to wordsplit your array elements to pieces and break everything again. Another use of `"${arrayname[@]}"` is simplifying the above loop, for instance: {{{ |
The first example creates an array named `names` which is filled up with a few elements. In a second statement, the array is expanded, replacing the array's expansion syntax by the elements contained within it. This effectively turns the second statement of the first example into the same thing as the second example, after array expansion has occurred. Remember to '''quote''' the `${arrayname[@]}` expansion properly. If you don't, you'll lose all benefit of having used an array at all: leaving arguments unquoted means you're telling bash it's OK to wordsplit them into pieces and break everything again. The above example expanded the array in a `for`-loop statement. But you can expand the array anywhere you want to put its elements as arguments; for instance in a `cp` command: {{{ myfiles=(db.sql home.tbz2 etc.tbz2) |
Line 137: | Line 155: |
This runs the `cp` command, replaces the `"${myfiles[@]}"` part by each filename in the `myfiles` array, properly quoted, causing `cp` to safely copy them to your backups. You can also expand single array elements by referencing their element number (called '''index'''). Though remember that arrays are ''zero-based'', which means that their '''first element''' has the index '''zero''': |
This runs the `cp` command, replacing the `"${myfiles[@]}"` part with every filename in the `myfiles` array, properly quoted. After expansion, bash will effectively run this: {{{ cp db.sql home.tbz2 etc.tbz2 /backups/ }}} `cp` will then copy the files to your `/backups/` directory. You can also expand single array elements by referencing their element number (called '''index'''). Remember that by default, arrays are ''zero-based'', which means that their '''first element''' has the index '''zero''': |
Line 146: | Line 168: |
There is also a second form of expanding all array elements, which is `"${arrayname[*]}"`. This form is '''ONLY''' useful for converting arrays back into a single string. The only real purpose for this is outputting the array to humans: |
(You could create an array with no element 0. Remember what we said about ''sparse arrays'' earlier -- you can have "holes" in the sequence of indices, and this applies to the beginning of the array as well as the middle. It's your responsibility as the programmer to know which of your arrays are potentially spare, and which ones are not.) There is also a second form of expanding all array elements, which is `"${arrayname[*]}"`. This form is '''ONLY''' useful for converting arrays into a single string with all the elements joined together. The main purpose for this is outputting the array to humans: |
Line 154: | Line 177: |
Notice that in the resulting string, there's no way to tell where the names begin and end! This is why we keep everything separate as long as possible. | |
Line 164: | Line 188: |
Notice how in this example we put the `IFS=,; echo ...` statement in a ''Subshell'' by wrapping `(` and `)` around it. We do this because we don't want to change the default value of `IFS` in the main shell. As soon as the subshell exits, `IFS` is still its default value and no longer just a comma. This is important because `IFS` is used for a lot of things, and changing its value to something non-default will result in very odd behavior if you don't expect it! |
Notice how in this example we put the `IFS=,; echo ...` statement in a [[BashGuide/CompoundCommands#Subshells|Subshell]] by wrapping `(` and `)` around it. We do this because we don't want to change the default value of `IFS` in the main shell. When the subshell exits, `IFS` still has its default value and no longer just a comma. This is important because `IFS` is used for a lot of things, and changing its value to something non-default will result in very odd behavior if you don't expect it! Alas, the `"${array[*]}"` expansion only uses the ''first'' character of `IFS` to join the elements together. If we wanted to separate the names in the previous example with a comma and a space, we would have to use some other technique (for example, a `for` loop). The `printf` command deserves special mention here, because it's a supremely elegant way to dump an array: {{{ $ names=("Bob" "Peter" "$USER" "Big Bad John") $ printf "%s\n" "${names[@]}" Bob Peter lhunath Big Bad John }}} Of course, a `for` loop offers the ultimate flexibility, but `printf` and its implicit looping over arguments can cover many of the simpler cases. It can even produce NUL-delimited streams, perfect for later retrieval: {{{ $ printf "%s\0" "${myarray[@]}" > myfile }}} |
Line 170: | Line 209: |
-------- | -------- <<Anchor(Associative_Arrays)>> === Associative Arrays === Until recently, [[BASH]] could only use numbers (more specifically, non-negative integers) as keys of arrays. This means you could not "map" or "translate" one string to another. This is something a lot of people missed. People began to (ab)use [[BashFAQ/006|variable indirection]] as a means to address the issue. Since [[BASH]] 4 was released, there is no longer any excuse to use indirection (or '''worse''', `eval`) for this purpose. You can now use full-featured associative arrays. To create an associative array, you need to declare it as such (using `declare -A`). This is to guarantee backward compatibility with the standard indexed arrays. Here's how you do that: {{{ $ declare -A fullNames $ fullNames=( ["lhunath"]="Maarten Billemont" ["greycat"]="Greg Wooledge" ) $ echo "Current user is: $USER. Full name: ${fullNames[$USER]}." Current user is: lhunath. Full name: Maarten Billemont. }}} With the same syntax as for indexed arrays, you can iterate over the keys of associative arrays: {{{ $ for user in "${!fullNames[@]}" > do echo "User: $user, full name: ${fullNames[$user]}."; done User: lhunath, full name: Maarten Billemont. User: greycat, full name: Greg Wooledge. }}} Two things to remember, here: First, the order of the keys you get back from an associative array using the `${!array[@]}` syntax is unpredictable; it won't necessarily be the order in which you assigned elements, or any kind of sorted order. Second, you cannot omit the `$` if you're using a parameter as the key of an associative array. With standard indexed arrays, the `[...]` part is actually an arithmetic context (really, you can do math there without an explicit `$((...))` markup). In an arithmetic context, a ''Name'' can't possibly be a valid number, and so BASH assumes it's a parameter and that you want to use its content. This doesn't work with associative arrays, since a ''Name'' could just as well be a valid associative array key. Let's demonstrate with examples: {{{ $ indexedArray=( "one" "two" ) $ declare -A associativeArray=( ["foo"]="bar" ["alpha"]="omega" ) $ index=0 key="foo" $ echo "${indexedArray[$index]}" one $ echo "${indexedArray[index]}" one $ echo "${indexedArray[index + 1]}" two $ echo "${associativeArray[$key]}" bar $ echo "${associativeArray[key]}" $ echo "${associativeArray[key + 1]}" }}} As you can see, both `$index` and `index` work fine with indexed arrays. They both evaluate to `0`. You can even do math on it to increase it to `1` and get the second value. No go with associative arrays, though. Here, we need to use `$key`; the others fail. -------- [[BashGuide/Patterns|<- Patterns]] | [[BashGuide/TestsAndConditionals|Tests and Conditionals ->]] |
<- Patterns | Tests and Conditionals ->
Arrays
As mentioned earlier, BASH provides three types of parameters: Strings, Integers and Arrays.
Strings are without a doubt the most used parameter type. But they are also the most misused parameter type. It is important to remember that a string holds just one element. Capturing the output of a command, for instance, and putting it in a string parameter means that parameter holds just one string of characters, regardless of whether that string represents twenty filenames, twenty numbers or twenty names of people.
And as is always the case when you put multiple items in a single string, these multiple items must be somehow delimited from each other. We, as humans, can usually decipher what the different filenames are when looking at a string. We assume that, perhaps, each line in the string represents a filename, or each word represents a filename. While this assumption is understandable, it is also inherently flawed. Each single filename can contain every character you might want to use to separate the filenames from each other in a string. That means there's technically no telling where the first filename in the string ends, because there's no character that can say: "I denote the end of this filename" because that character itself could be part of the filename.
Often, people make this mistake:
# This does NOT work in the general case $ myfiles=$(ls); cp $files /backups/
When this would probably be a better idea:
# This DOES work in the general case $ myfiles
This attempt at backing up our files in the current directory is flawed. We put the output of ls in a string called files and then use the unquoted $files parameter expansion to cut that string into arguments (relying on Word Splitting). As mentioned before, argument and word splitting cuts a string into pieces wherever there is whitespace. Relying on it means we assume that none of our filenames will contain any whitespace. If they do, the filename will be cut in half or more. Conclusion: bad.
The only safe way to represent multiple string elements in bash is through the use of arrays. Arrays are types that map integers to strings. That basically means that they hold a numbered list of strings. Since each of these strings is a separate entity (element), it can safely contain any character.
For the best results and the least headaches, remember that if you have a list of things, you should always put it in an array.
Unlike some other programming languages, bash does not offer lists, tuples, etc. Just arrays, and associative arrays (which are new in bash 4).
Array: An array is a numbered list of strings: It maps integers to strings.
Creating Arrays
There are several ways you can create or fill your array with data. There is no one single true way: the method you'll need depends on where your data comes from and what it is.
The easiest way to create a simple array with data is by using the =() syntax:
$ names=("Bob" "Peter" "$USER" "Big Bad John")
This syntax is great for creating arrays with static data or a known set of string parameters, but it gives us very little flexibility for adding lots of array elements. If you need more flexibility, you can also specify explicit indexes:
$ names=([0]="Bob" [1]="Peter" [20]="$USER" [21]="Big Bad John") # or... $ names[0]="Bob"
Notice that there is a gap between indices 1 and 20 in this example. An array with holes in it is called a sparse array. Bash allows this, and it can often be quite useful.
If you want to fill an array with filenames, then you'll probably want to use Globs in there:
$ photos=(~/"My Photos"/*.jpg)
Notice here that we quoted the My Photos part because it contains a space. If we hadn't quoted it, bash would have split it up into photos=('~/My' 'Photos/'*.jpg ) which is obviously not what we want. Also notice that we quoted only the part that contained the space. That's because we cannot quote the ~ or the *; if we do, they'll become literal and bash won't treat them as special characters anymore.
Creating arrays with a bunch of filenames becomes really easy like this. So remember to never use ls:
$ files=$(ls) # BAD, BAD, BAD! $ files=($(ls)) # STILL BAD! $ files=(*) # Good!
The first would create a string with the output of ls. That string cannot possibly be used safely for reasons mentioned in the Arrays introduction. The second is closer, but it still splits up filenames with whitespace. The third statement gives us an array where each filename is a separate element. Perfect.
This section that we're about to introduce contains some advanced concepts. If you get lost, you may want to return here after you've read the whole guide. You can skip ahead to Using Arrays if you want to keep things simple.
Now, sometimes we want to build an array from a string or the output of a command. Commands (generally) just output strings: for instance, running a find command will enumerate filenames, and separate these filenames with newlines (putting each filename on a separate line). So to parse that one big string into an array we need to tell bash where each element ends. (Note, this is a bad example, because filenames can contain a newline, so it is not safe to delimit them with newlines! But see below.)
Breaking up a string is what IFS is used for:
$ IFS=. read -a ip_elements <<< "127.0.0.1"
Here we use IFS with the value . to cut the given ip address into array elements wherever there's a ., resulting in an array with the elements 127, 0, 0 and 1.
(The builtin command read and the <<< operator will be covered in more depth in the Input and Output chapter.)
We could do the same thing with a find command, by setting IFS to a newline. But then our script would fail when someone creates a filename with a newline in it (either accidentally or maliciously).
So, is there any way to get a list of elements from an external program (like find) into a bash array? In general, the answer is yes, provided there is a reliable way to delimit the elements.
In the specific case of filenames, the answer to this problem is NUL bytes. A NUL byte is a byte which is just all zeros: 00000000. Bash strings can't contain NUL bytes, because of an artifact of the "C" programming language: NUL bytes are used in C to mark the end of a string. Since bash is written in C and uses C's native strings, it inherits that behavior.
A data stream (like the output of a command, or a file) can contain NUL bytes. Streams are like strings with three big differences: they are read sequentially (you usually can't jump around); they're unidirectional (you can read from them, or write to them, but typically not both); and they can contain NUL bytes.
File names cannot contain NUL bytes (since they're implemented as C strings by Unix), and neither can the vast majority of human-readable things we would want to store in a script (people's names, IP addresses, etc.). That makes NUL a great candidate for separating elements in a stream. Quite often, the command whose output you want to read will have an option that makes it output its data separated by NUL bytes rather than newlines or something else. find (on GNU and BSD, anyway) has the option -print0, which we'll use in this example:
files=() while read -r -d $'\0'; do files+=("$REPLY") done < <(find /foo -print0)
This is a safe way of parsing a command's output into strings. Understandably, it looks a little confusing and convoluted at first. So let's take it apart:
The first line files=() creates an empty array named files.
We're using a while loop that runs a read command each time. The read command uses the -d $'\0' option, which means that instead of reading a line at a time (up to a newline), we're reading up to a NUL byte (\0). It also uses -r to prevent it from treating backslashes specially.
Once read has read some data and encountered a NUL byte, the while loop's body is executed. We put what we read (which is in the parameter REPLY) into our array.
To do this, we use the +=() syntax. This syntax adds one or more element(s) to the end of our array.
Finally, the < <(..) syntax is a combination of File Redirection (<) and Process Substitution (<(..)). Omitting the technical details for now, we'll simply say that this is how we send the output of the find command into our while loop.
The find command itself uses the -print0 option as mentioned before to tell it to separate the filenames it finds with a NUL byte.
Good Practice:
Arrays are a safe list of strings. They are perfect for storing multiple filenames.
If you have to parse a stream of data into component elements, there must be a way to tell where each element starts and ends. The NUL byte is very often the best choice for this job.
If you have a list of things, keep it in list form as long as possible. Don't smash it into a string or a file until you absolutely have to. If you do have to write it out to a file and read it back in later, keep in mind the delimiter problem we mentioned above.
In The Manual: Arrays
In the FAQ:
How can I use array variables?
How can I use variable variables (indirect variables, pointers, references) or associative arrays?
How can I find and deal with file names containing newlines, spaces or both?
I set variables in a loop. Why do they suddenly disappear after the loop terminates? Or, why can't I pipe data to read?
Using Arrays
Walking over array elements is really easy. Because an array is such a safe medium of storage, we can simply use a for loop to iterate over its elements:
$ for file in "${myfiles[@]}"; do > cp "$file" /backups/ > done
Notice the syntax used to expand the array here. We use the quoted form: "${arrayname[@]}". That causes bash to replace it with every single element in the array, properly quoted.
The following two examples have the same effect:
$ names=("Bob" "Peter" "$USER" "Big Bad John") $ for name in "${names[@]}"; do :; done
$ for name in "Bob" "Peter" "$USER" "Big Bad John"; do :; done
The first example creates an array named names which is filled up with a few elements. In a second statement, the array is expanded, replacing the array's expansion syntax by the elements contained within it. This effectively turns the second statement of the first example into the same thing as the second example, after array expansion has occurred.
Remember to quote the ${arrayname[@]} expansion properly. If you don't, you'll lose all benefit of having used an array at all: leaving arguments unquoted means you're telling bash it's OK to wordsplit them into pieces and break everything again.
The above example expanded the array in a for-loop statement. But you can expand the array anywhere you want to put its elements as arguments; for instance in a cp command:
myfiles=(db.sql home.tbz2 etc.tbz2) cp "${myfiles[@]}" /backups/
This runs the cp command, replacing the "${myfiles[@]}" part with every filename in the myfiles array, properly quoted. After expansion, bash will effectively run this:
cp db.sql home.tbz2 etc.tbz2 /backups/
cp will then copy the files to your /backups/ directory.
You can also expand single array elements by referencing their element number (called index). Remember that by default, arrays are zero-based, which means that their first element has the index zero:
$ echo "The first name is: ${names[0]}" $ echo "The second name is: ${names[1]}"
(You could create an array with no element 0. Remember what we said about sparse arrays earlier -- you can have "holes" in the sequence of indices, and this applies to the beginning of the array as well as the middle. It's your responsibility as the programmer to know which of your arrays are potentially spare, and which ones are not.)
There is also a second form of expanding all array elements, which is "${arrayname[*]}". This form is ONLY useful for converting arrays into a single string with all the elements joined together. The main purpose for this is outputting the array to humans:
$ names=("Bob" "Peter" "$USER" "Big Bad John") $ echo "Today's contestants are: ${names[*]}" Today's contestants are: Bob Peter lhunath Big Bad John
Notice that in the resulting string, there's no way to tell where the names begin and end! This is why we keep everything separate as long as possible.
Remember to still keep everything nicely quoted! If you don't keep ${arrayname[*]} quoted, once again bash's Wordsplitting will cut it into bits.
You can combine IFS with "${arrayname[*]}" to indicate the character to use to delimit your array elements as you merge them into a single string. This is handy, for example, when you want to comma delimit names:
$ names=("Bob" "Peter" "$USER" "Big Bad John") $ ( IFS=,; echo "Today's contestants are: ${names[*]}" ) Today's contestants are: Bob,Peter,lhunath,Big Bad John
Notice how in this example we put the IFS=,; echo ... statement in a Subshell by wrapping ( and ) around it. We do this because we don't want to change the default value of IFS in the main shell. When the subshell exits, IFS still has its default value and no longer just a comma. This is important because IFS is used for a lot of things, and changing its value to something non-default will result in very odd behavior if you don't expect it!
Alas, the "${array[*]}" expansion only uses the first character of IFS to join the elements together. If we wanted to separate the names in the previous example with a comma and a space, we would have to use some other technique (for example, a for loop).
The printf command deserves special mention here, because it's a supremely elegant way to dump an array:
$ names=("Bob" "Peter" "$USER" "Big Bad John") $ printf "%s\n" "${names[@]}" Bob Peter lhunath Big Bad John
Of course, a for loop offers the ultimate flexibility, but printf and its implicit looping over arguments can cover many of the simpler cases. It can even produce NUL-delimited streams, perfect for later retrieval:
$ printf "%s\0" "${myarray[@]}" > myfile
Good Practice:
Always quote your array expansions properly, just like you would your normal parameter expansions.
Use "${myarray[@]}" to expand all your array elements and ONLY use "${myarray[*]}" when you want to merge all your array elements into a single string.
Associative Arrays
Until recently, BASH could only use numbers (more specifically, non-negative integers) as keys of arrays. This means you could not "map" or "translate" one string to another. This is something a lot of people missed. People began to (ab)use variable indirection as a means to address the issue.
Since BASH 4 was released, there is no longer any excuse to use indirection (or worse, eval) for this purpose. You can now use full-featured associative arrays.
To create an associative array, you need to declare it as such (using declare -A). This is to guarantee backward compatibility with the standard indexed arrays. Here's how you do that:
$ declare -A fullNames $ fullNames=( ["lhunath"]="Maarten Billemont" ["greycat"]="Greg Wooledge" ) $ echo "Current user is: $USER. Full name: ${fullNames[$USER]}." Current user is: lhunath. Full name: Maarten Billemont.
With the same syntax as for indexed arrays, you can iterate over the keys of associative arrays:
$ for user in "${!fullNames[@]}" > do echo "User: $user, full name: ${fullNames[$user]}."; done User: lhunath, full name: Maarten Billemont. User: greycat, full name: Greg Wooledge.
Two things to remember, here: First, the order of the keys you get back from an associative array using the ${!array[@]} syntax is unpredictable; it won't necessarily be the order in which you assigned elements, or any kind of sorted order.
Second, you cannot omit the $ if you're using a parameter as the key of an associative array. With standard indexed arrays, the [...] part is actually an arithmetic context (really, you can do math there without an explicit $((...)) markup). In an arithmetic context, a Name can't possibly be a valid number, and so BASH assumes it's a parameter and that you want to use its content. This doesn't work with associative arrays, since a Name could just as well be a valid associative array key.
Let's demonstrate with examples:
$ indexedArray=( "one" "two" ) $ declare -A associativeArray=( ["foo"]="bar" ["alpha"]="omega" ) $ index=0 key="foo" $ echo "${indexedArray[$index]}" one $ echo "${indexedArray[index]}" one $ echo "${indexedArray[index + 1]}" two $ echo "${associativeArray[$key]}" bar $ echo "${associativeArray[key]}" $ echo "${associativeArray[key + 1]}"
As you can see, both $index and index work fine with indexed arrays. They both evaluate to 0. You can even do math on it to increase it to 1 and get the second value. No go with associative arrays, though. Here, we need to use $key; the others fail.