2757
Comment: first-line
|
← Revision 37 as of 2023-01-26 22:54:33 ⇥
4194
sed before awk
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 2: | Line 2: |
== How can I grep for lines containing foo AND bar, foo OR bar? Or for files containing foo AND bar, possibly on separate lines? == | == How can I grep for lines containing foo AND bar, foo OR bar? Or for files containing foo AND bar, possibly on separate lines? Or files containing foo but NOT bar? == This is really four different questions, so we'll break this answer into parts. === foo AND bar on the same line === |
Line 5: | Line 9: |
{{{ | {{{#!highlight bash |
Line 7: | Line 11: |
grep foo "$myfile" | grep bar # for those who need the hand-holding | grep foo -- "$myfile" | grep bar # for those who need the hand-holding |
Line 10: | Line 14: |
It can also be done with one {{{egrep}}}, although (as you can probably guess) this doesn't really scale well to more than two patterns: | It can also be done with one {{{grep}}}, although (as you can probably guess) this doesn't really scale well to more than two patterns: |
Line 12: | Line 16: |
{{{ egrep 'foo.*bar|bar.*foo' |
{{{#!highlight bash grep -E 'foo.*bar|bar.*foo' |
Line 18: | Line 22: |
{{{ sed -n '/foo/{/bar/p}' |
{{{#!highlight bash sed '/foo/!d; /bar/!d' |
Line 23: | Line 27: |
If you need to scale the awk solution to an arbitrary number of patterns, you can construct the awk command on the fly: | If you need to scale the awk solution to an arbitrary number of patterns, you can write a function like this: |
Line 25: | Line 29: |
{{{ # bash, ksh93 # Constructs awk "/$1/&&/$2/&&...." # Data to be matched should be on stdin. # Writes matching lines to stdout. multimatch() { (($# < 2)) && { echo "usage: multimatch pat1 pat2 [...]" >&2; return 1; } awk "/$1/$(printf "&&/%s/" "${@:2}")" |
{{{#!highlight sh # POSIX multimatch() { # usage: multimatch pattern... awk ' BEGIN { for ( i = 1; i < ARGC; i++ ) a[i] = ARGV[i] ARGC = 1 } { for (i in a) if ($0 !~ a[i]) next }' "$@" |
Line 36: | Line 47: |
To match lines containing foo OR bar, {{{egrep}}} is the natural choice, but it can also be done with {{{sed}}}, {{{awk}}}, etc. | === foo OR bar on the same line === |
Line 38: | Line 49: |
{{{ egrep 'foo|bar' # some people prefer grep -E 'foo|bar' |
There are lots of ways to match lines containing foo OR bar. `grep` can be given multiple patterns with `-e`: |
Line 42: | Line 51: |
# This is another option, some people prefer: | {{{#!highlight bash |
Line 44: | Line 53: |
}}} | |
Line 45: | Line 55: |
# awk equivalent (eg if you want to extract fields) | Or you can separate the patterns with newlines: {{{#!highlight bash grep 'foo bar' }}} Or you can construct one pattern with {{{grep -E}}}: {{{#!highlight bash grep -E 'foo|bar' }}} (You can't use the `|` union operator with plain `grep`. `|` is only available in [[RegularExpression|Extended Regular Expressions]].) It can also be done with {{{sed}}}, {{{awk}}}, etc. {{{#!highlight bash sed -n -e '/foo/{ p; d; }' -e '/bar/{ p; d; }' |
Line 49: | Line 77: |
{{{egrep}}} is the oldest and most portable form of the {{{grep}}} command using [[RegularExpression|Extended Regular Expressions (EREs)]]. {{{grep -E}}} is required by POSIX. | The `awk` approach has the advantage of letting you use `awk`'s other features on the matched lines, such as extracting only certain fields. To match lines that do not contain "foo" AND do not contain "bar": {{{#!highlight bash grep -E -v 'foo|bar' }}} Or using {{{sed}}}, or {{{awk}}}: {{{#!highlight bash sed -e '/foo/d' -e '/bar/d' awk '!/foo|bar/' }}} === foo AND bar in the same file, not necessarily on the same line === |
Line 53: | Line 95: |
{{{ grep -q foo "$myfile" && grep -q bar "$myfile" && echo "Found both" |
{{{#!highligh bash if grep -q foo "$myfile" && grep -q bar "$myfile"; then printf 'Found both\n' fi |
Line 56: | Line 100: |
Line 61: | Line 104: |
{{{ awk '/foo/{a=1} /bar/{b=1} a&&b{print "both found";exit} END{if (a&&b){ exit 0} else{exit 1}}' |
{{{#!highligh bash if awk '/foo/{a=1} /bar/{b=1} a&&b{exit} END{if(a&&b){exit 0};exit 1}' "$myfile"; then printf 'Found both\n' fi }}} It reads the file one time, stopping when both patterns have been matched. No matter what happens, the END block is then executed, and the exit status is set accordingly. If you want to do additional checking of the file's contents, this awk solution can be adapted quite easily. A perl one-liner that scales to any number of patterns, while also reading each input file only once: {{{#!highligh bash perl -e '@pat=("foo","bar"); local $/; L: for $f (@ARGV){open(FH,,$f); $a=<FH>; for(@pat){next L unless $a =~ $_} print "$f\n"}' |
Line 65: | Line 119: |
It reads the file one time, stopping when both patterns have been matched. No matter what happens, the END block is then executed, and the exit status is set accordingly. |
=== foo but NOT bar in the same file, possibly on different lines === |
Line 68: | Line 121: |
If you want to do additional checking of the file's contents, this awk solution can be adapted quite easily. | This is a variant of the previous case. The advantage here is that if we find "bar", we can stop reading. Here's an awk solution: {{{#!highligh bash awk '/foo/{good=1} /bar/{good=0;exit} END{exit !good}' }}} |
How can I grep for lines containing foo AND bar, foo OR bar? Or for files containing foo AND bar, possibly on separate lines? Or files containing foo but NOT bar?
This is really four different questions, so we'll break this answer into parts.
foo AND bar on the same line
The easiest way to match lines that contain both foo AND bar is to use two grep commands:
It can also be done with one grep, although (as you can probably guess) this doesn't really scale well to more than two patterns:
1 grep -E 'foo.*bar|bar.*foo'
If you prefer, you can achieve this in one sed or awk statement:
If you need to scale the awk solution to an arbitrary number of patterns, you can write a function like this:
foo OR bar on the same line
There are lots of ways to match lines containing foo OR bar. grep can be given multiple patterns with -e:
1 grep -e 'foo' -e 'bar'
Or you can separate the patterns with newlines:
Or you can construct one pattern with grep -E:
1 grep -E 'foo|bar'
(You can't use the | union operator with plain grep. | is only available in Extended Regular Expressions.)
It can also be done with sed, awk, etc.
The awk approach has the advantage of letting you use awk's other features on the matched lines, such as extracting only certain fields.
To match lines that do not contain "foo" AND do not contain "bar":
1 grep -E -v 'foo|bar'
Or using sed, or awk:
foo AND bar in the same file, not necessarily on the same line
If you want to match files (rather than lines) that contain both "foo" and "bar", there are several possible approaches. The simplest (although not necessarily the most efficient) is to read the file twice:
if grep -q foo "$myfile" && grep -q bar "$myfile"; then printf 'Found both\n' fi
The double grep -q solution has the advantage of stopping each read whenever it finds a match; so if you have a huge file, but the matched words are both near the top, it will only read the first part of the file. Unfortunately, if the matches are near the bottom (worst case: very last line of the file), you may read the whole file two times.
Another approach is to read the file once, keeping track of what you've seen as you go along. In awk:
if awk '/foo/{a=1} /bar/{b=1} a&&b{exit} END{if(a&&b){exit 0};exit 1}' "$myfile"; then printf 'Found both\n' fi
It reads the file one time, stopping when both patterns have been matched. No matter what happens, the END block is then executed, and the exit status is set accordingly.
If you want to do additional checking of the file's contents, this awk solution can be adapted quite easily.
A perl one-liner that scales to any number of patterns, while also reading each input file only once:
perl -e '@pat=("foo","bar"); local $/; L: for $f (@ARGV){open(FH,,$f); $a=<FH>; for(@pat){next L unless $a =~ $_} print "$f\n"}'
foo but NOT bar in the same file, possibly on different lines
This is a variant of the previous case. The advantage here is that if we find "bar", we can stop reading. Here's an awk solution:
awk '/foo/{good=1} /bar/{good=0;exit} END{exit !good}'