2260
Comment: gods, what a fucking mess.
|
4659
bashfaq is brittle about empty lines
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
[[Anchor(faq54)]] | <<Anchor(faq54)>> |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
First, you have to define what you mean by "number". The most common case when people ask this seems to be "a non-negative integer, with no leading + sign". Or in other words, a string of all digits. Other times, people want to validate a floating-point input, with optional sign and optional decimal point. | |
Line 4: | Line 5: |
First, you have to define what you mean by "number". The most common case seems to be that, when people ask this, they actually mean "a non-negative integer, with no leading + sign". | === Hand parsing === If you're validating a simple "string of digits", you can do it with a [[glob]]: |
Line 7: | Line 9: |
if [[ $foo = *[^0-9]* ]]; then echo "'$foo' has a non-digit somewhere in it" |
# Bash if [[ $foo != *[!0-9]* ]]; then echo "'$foo' is strictly numeric" |
Line 10: | Line 13: |
echo "'$foo' is strictly numeric" | echo "'$foo' has a non-digit somewhere in it" |
Line 13: | Line 16: |
This can be done in Korn and legacy Bourne shells as well, using {{{case}}}: |
The same thing can be done in Korn and POSIX shells as well, using {{{case}}}: |
Line 17: | Line 19: |
case "$foo" in *[!0-9]*) echo "'$foo' has a non-digit somewhere in it" ;; *) echo "'$foo' is strictly numeric" ;; |
# POSIX case $var in '') printf 'var is empty\n';; *[!0-9]*) printf '%s has a non-digit somewhere in it\n' "$var";; *) printf '%s is strictly numeric\n' "$var";; esac >&2 }}} Of course, if all you care about is vald vs. invalid, you can combine cases: {{{ # POSIX case $var in '' | *[!0-9]*) echo "$0: $var: invalid digit" >&2; exit 1;; |
Line 22: | Line 38: |
If what you actually mean is "a valid floating-point number" or something else more complex, then you might prefer to use a regular expression. Bash version 3 and above have regular expression support in the [[ command: |
If you need to allow a leading negative sign, or if want a valid floating-point number or something else more complex, then there are a few possible ways. Standard globs aren't expressive enough to do this, but you can trim off any sign and then compare: |
Line 26: | Line 41: |
if [[ $foo && $foo =~ ^[-+]?[0-9]*\(\.[0-9]+\)?$ ]]; then # Bash 3.1 only! | # POSIX case ${var#[-+]} in # notice ${var#prefix} substitution to trim sign '') printf 'var is empty\n';; *.*.*) printf '%s has more than one decimal point in it\n' "$var";; *[!0-9.]*) printf '%s has a non-digit somewhere in it\n' "$var";; *) printf '%s looks like a valid float\n' "$var";; esac >&2 }}} Or in Bash, we can use [[glob|extended globs]]: {{{ # Bash -- extended globs must be enabled explicitly in versions prior to 4.1. # Check whether the variable is all digits. shopt -s extglob [[ $var = +([0-9]) ]] }}} A more complex case: {{{ # Bash / ksh shopt -s extglob if [[ $foo = @(*[0-9]*|!([+-]|)) && $foo = ?([+-])*([0-9])?(.*([0-9])) ]]; then echo 'foo is a floating-point number' fi }}} Optionally, `case..esac` may have been used in shells with extended pattern matching. The leading test of {{{$foo}}} is to ensure that it contains at least one digit, isn't empty, and contains more than just + or - by itself. If your definition of "a valid number" is even more complex, or if you need a solution that works in legacy Bourne shells, you might prefer to use an external tool's [[RegularExpression|regular expression]] syntax. Here is a portable version (explained in detail [[http://www.wplug.org/wiki/Meeting-20100612#EXERCISE_TWO|here]]), using {{{egrep}}}: {{{ # Bourne if echo "$foo" | grep -qE '^[-+]?([0-9]+\.?|[0-9]*\.[0-9]+)$'; then echo "'$foo' is a number" else echo "'$foo' is not a number" fi }}} Bash version 3 and above have regular expression support in the [[ command. {{{ # Bash # The regexp must be stored in a var and expanded for backward compatibility with versions < 3.2 regexp='^[-+]?[0-9]*(\.[0-9]*)?$' if [[ $foo = *[0-9]* && $foo =~ $regexp ]]; then |
Line 32: | Line 96: |
=== Using the parsing done by [ and printf (or "using eq") === {{{ # fails with ksh if [ "$foo" -eq "$foo" ] 2>/dev/null; then echo "$foo is an integer" fi }}} `[` parses the variable and interprets it as an integer because of the `-eq`. If the parsing succeeds the test is trivially true; if it fails `[` prints an error message that `2>/dev/null` hides and sets a status different from 0. However this method fails if the shell is ksh, because ksh evaluates the variable as an arithmetic expression. |
|
Line 33: | Line 105: |
Unfortunately, bash changed the syntax of its regular expression support after version 3.1, so the following ''may'' work in some patched versions of bash 3.2: | Be careful: the following trick with `printf` (no supported by all shells) |
Line 36: | Line 108: |
if [[ $foo && $foo =~ ^[-+]?[0-9]*(\.[0-9]+)?$ ]]; then # **PATCHED** Bash 3.2 only! echo "'$foo' looks rather like a number" else echo "'$foo' doesn't look particularly numeric to me" |
# BASH if printf %f "$foo" >/dev/null 2>&1; then echo "$foo is a float" |
Line 42: | Line 113: |
is broken: about the arguments of the{{{ a}}}, {{{A}}}, {{{e}}}, {{{E}}}, {{{f}}}, {{{F}}}, {{{g}}}, or {{{G}}} format modifiers, POSIX specifies that ''if the leading character is a single-quote or double-quote, the value shall be the numeric value in the underlying codeset of the character following the single-quote or double-quote.'' Hence this fails when {{{foo}}} expands to a string with a leading single-quote or double-quote: the previous command will happily validate the string as a float. | |
Line 43: | Line 115: |
It fails rather spectacularly in bash 3.1 and in bash 3.2 without patches. If you don't have bash version 3, or if you simply don't want to bother screwing around with broken shell features, then you would use {{{egrep}}}: {{{ if test "$foo" && echo "$foo" | egrep '^[-+]?[0-9]*(\.[0-9]+)?$' >/dev/null; then echo "'$foo' might be a number" else echo "'$foo' might not be a number" fi }}} Note that the parentheses in the {{{egrep}}} regular expression don't require backslashes in front of them, whereas the ones in the bash3 command (the 3.1 version, not the 3.2 version!) do. Also, the leading test of {{{"$foo"}}} (in both versions) is to ensure that it is not an empty string. (An em,pty string would satisfy the regex, and changing the regex to avoid that is not worth the effort.) |
You can use `%d` to parse an integer. Take care that the parsing might be (is supposed to be?) [[locale]]-dependent. |
How can I tell whether a variable contains a valid number?
First, you have to define what you mean by "number". The most common case when people ask this seems to be "a non-negative integer, with no leading + sign". Or in other words, a string of all digits. Other times, people want to validate a floating-point input, with optional sign and optional decimal point.
Hand parsing
If you're validating a simple "string of digits", you can do it with a glob:
# Bash if [[ $foo != *[!0-9]* ]]; then echo "'$foo' is strictly numeric" else echo "'$foo' has a non-digit somewhere in it" fi
The same thing can be done in Korn and POSIX shells as well, using case:
# POSIX case $var in '') printf 'var is empty\n';; *[!0-9]*) printf '%s has a non-digit somewhere in it\n' "$var";; *) printf '%s is strictly numeric\n' "$var";; esac >&2
Of course, if all you care about is vald vs. invalid, you can combine cases:
# POSIX case $var in '' | *[!0-9]*) echo "$0: $var: invalid digit" >&2; exit 1;; esac
If you need to allow a leading negative sign, or if want a valid floating-point number or something else more complex, then there are a few possible ways. Standard globs aren't expressive enough to do this, but you can trim off any sign and then compare:
# POSIX case ${var#[-+]} in # notice ${var#prefix} substitution to trim sign '') printf 'var is empty\n';; *.*.*) printf '%s has more than one decimal point in it\n' "$var";; *[!0-9.]*) printf '%s has a non-digit somewhere in it\n' "$var";; *) printf '%s looks like a valid float\n' "$var";; esac >&2
Or in Bash, we can use extended globs:
# Bash -- extended globs must be enabled explicitly in versions prior to 4.1. # Check whether the variable is all digits. shopt -s extglob [[ $var = +([0-9]) ]]
A more complex case:
# Bash / ksh shopt -s extglob if [[ $foo = @(*[0-9]*|!([+-]|)) && $foo = ?([+-])*([0-9])?(.*([0-9])) ]]; then echo 'foo is a floating-point number' fi
Optionally, case..esac may have been used in shells with extended pattern matching. The leading test of $foo is to ensure that it contains at least one digit, isn't empty, and contains more than just + or - by itself.
If your definition of "a valid number" is even more complex, or if you need a solution that works in legacy Bourne shells, you might prefer to use an external tool's regular expression syntax. Here is a portable version (explained in detail here), using egrep:
# Bourne if echo "$foo" | grep -qE '^[-+]?([0-9]+\.?|[0-9]*\.[0-9]+)$'; then echo "'$foo' is a number" else echo "'$foo' is not a number" fi
Bash version 3 and above have regular expression support in the [[ command.
# Bash # The regexp must be stored in a var and expanded for backward compatibility with versions < 3.2 regexp='^[-+]?[0-9]*(\.[0-9]*)?$' if [[ $foo = *[0-9]* && $foo =~ $regexp ]]; then echo "'$foo' looks rather like a number" else echo "'$foo' doesn't look particularly numeric to me" fi
Using the parsing done by [ and printf (or "using eq")
# fails with ksh if [ "$foo" -eq "$foo" ] 2>/dev/null; then echo "$foo is an integer" fi
[ parses the variable and interprets it as an integer because of the -eq. If the parsing succeeds the test is trivially true; if it fails [ prints an error message that 2>/dev/null hides and sets a status different from 0. However this method fails if the shell is ksh, because ksh evaluates the variable as an arithmetic expression.
Be careful: the following trick with printf (no supported by all shells)
# BASH if printf %f "$foo" >/dev/null 2>&1; then echo "$foo is a float" fi
is broken: about the arguments of the a, A, e, E, f, F, g, or G format modifiers, POSIX specifies that if the leading character is a single-quote or double-quote, the value shall be the numeric value in the underlying codeset of the character following the single-quote or double-quote. Hence this fails when foo expands to a string with a leading single-quote or double-quote: the previous command will happily validate the string as a float.
You can use %d to parse an integer. Take care that the parsing might be (is supposed to be?) locale-dependent.