Differences between revisions 60 and 86 (spanning 26 versions)
Revision 60 as of 2012-02-01 13:55:20
Size: 9031
Editor: a91-155-176-245
Comment: Move --verbose=VALUE alphabetically lower (after short option -v)
Revision 86 as of 2014-07-04 20:28:52
Size: 6142
Editor: ormaaj
Comment: Input validation for POSIX example.
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
Line 5: Line 4:
Line 11: Line 9:
This approach handles any arbitrary set of options, because you're writing the parser yourself. For 90% of programs, this is the simplest approach (because you rarely need fancy stuff).
Line 12: Line 11:
This approach handles any arbitrary set of options, because you're
writing the parser yourself. For 90% of programs, it may suffice.
Here's an example that will handle a combination of short and long
options. Notice how the handling of various styles of "--verbose",
"--verbose LEVEL" and "--verbose=LEVEL" are handled.
This example will handle a combination of short and long options. Notice how both "--file" and "--file=FILE" are handled.

{{{#!highlight bash
#!/bin/sh
# (POSIX shell syntax)

# Reset all variables that might be set
file=
verbose=0

while :; do
    case $1 in
        -h|-\?|--help) # Call a "show_help" function to display a synopsis, then exit.
            show_help
            exit
            ;;
        -f|--file) # Takes an option argument, ensuring it has been specified.
            if [ "$2" ]; then
                file=$2
                shift 2
                continue
            else
                echo 'ERROR: Must specify a non-empty "--file FILE" argument.' >&2
                exit 1
            fi
            ;;
        --file=?*)
            file=${1#*=} # Delete everything up to "=" and assign the remainder.
            ;;
        --file=) # Handle the case of an empty --file=
            echo 'ERROR: Must specify a non-empty "--file FILE" argument.' >&2
            exit 1
            ;;
        -v|--verbose)
            verbose=$((verbose + 1)) # Each -v argument adds 1 to verbosity.
            ;;
        --) # End of all options.
            shift
            break
            ;;
        -?*)
            printf 'WARN: Unknown option (ignored): %s\n' "$1" >&2
            ;;
        *) # Default case: If no more options then break out of the loop.
            break
    esac

    command shift
done

# Suppose --file is a required option. Check that it has been set.
if [ ! "$file" ]; then
    echo 'ERROR: option "--file FILE" not given. See --help.' >&2
    exit 1
fi

# Rest of the program here.
# If there are input files (for example) that follow the options, they
# will remain in the "$@" positional parameters.
}}}

This parser does not handle separate options concatenated together (like `-xvf` being understood as `-x -v -f`). This could be added with effort, but this is left as an exercise for the reader.

Some Bash programmers like to write this at the beginning of their scripts to guard against unused variables:

{{{
    set -u # or, set -o nounset
}}}
The use of this breaks the loop above, as "$1" may not be set upon entering the loop. There are four solutions to this issue:

 1. Stop using `-u`.
 1. Replace `case $1 in` with `case ${1+$1} in` (as well as bandaging all the other code that `set -u` breaks).
 1. Replace `case $1 in` with `case ${1-} in` (every potentially undeclared variable could be written as ${variable-} to prevent `set -u` tripping).
 1. Stop using `-u`.

=== getopts ===
Unless it's the version from util-linux, and you use its advanced mode, '''never use getopt(1).''' Traditional versions of `getopt` cannot handle empty argument strings, or arguments with embedded whitespace.

The POSIX shell (and others) offer `getopts` which is safe to use instead. Here is a simplistic `getopts` example:
Line 21: Line 94:
Main ()
{
    file="" # Reset all variables that might be set
    verbose=""
    verbose_level=""
# Usage info
show_help() {
cat << EOF
Usage: ${0##*/} [-hv] [-f OUTFILE] [FILE]...
Do stuff with FILE and write the result to standard output. With no FILE
or when FILE is -, read standard input.
    
    -h display this help and exit
    -f OUTFILE write the result to OUTFILE instead of standard output.
    -v verbose mode. Can be used multiple times for increased
                verbosity.
EOF
}
Line 27: Line 108:
    while :
    do
        case "$1" in
            -f | --file)
  file="$2" # You might want to check if you really got FILE
                shift 2
  ;;
            -h | --help)
  # Call your Help() function here.
         exit 0 # This not an error, User asked help. Don't do "exit 1"
                ;;
            -v | --verbose)
  # Support "--verbose"
# Initialize our own variables:
output_file=""
verbose=0
Line 41: Line 112:
                verbose="verbose"
  verbose_level=1
  shift
OPTIND=1 # Reset is necessary if getopts was used previously in the script. It is a good idea to make this local in a function.
while getopts "hvf:" opt; do
    case "$opt" in
        h)
            show_help
            exit 0
            ;;
        v) verbose=1
            ;;
        f) output_file=$OPTARG
            ;;
        '?')
            show_help >&2
            exit 1
            ;;
    esac
done
shift "$((OPTIND-1))" # Shift off the options and optional --.
Line 45: Line 131:
  # Support additional "--verbose LEVEL" by reading next argument.

  case "$1" in
      [0-9]) verbose_level=$1
      shift
      ;;
  esac
                ;;
            --verbose=*)
  # Example how to support "--option=VALUE" style
                verbose="verbose"
  verbose_level=${1#*=} # Delete everything up till "="
  shift
  ;;
            --) # End of all options
                shift
                break
                ;;
            -*)
                echo "WARN: Unknown option: $1" >&2
                shift
                ;;
            *) # no more options. Stop while loop
                break
                ;;
        esac
    done

    # Suppose, some options are required. Check that we got them.
    # Make --verbose a required option:

    if [ ! "$verbose" ]; then
        echo "ERROR: option --verbose not given. See --help" >&2
 return 1
    fi

    # <Rest of the program here>
}

Main "$@"
printf 'verbose=<%s>\noutput_file=<%s>\nLeftovers:\n' "$verbose" "$output_file"
printf '<%s>\n' "$@"
Line 88: Line 136:
The advantages of `getopts` are:
Line 89: Line 138:
What is ''not possible'' to do with pure shell approach, is to try to
parse separate options concatenated together. Like like `-xvf` which
would understood as `-x -v -f`. This could be possible with lot of
effort, but in practice it wouldn't be worth it.
 1. It's portable, and will work in any POSIX shell e.g. dash.
 1. It can handle things like `-vf filename` in the expected Unix way, automatically.
 1. It understands `--` as the option terminator and more generally makes sure, options are parsed like for any standard command.
 1. With some implementations, the error messages will be localised in the language of the user.
Line 94: Line 143:
You may be interested in knowing that some Bash programmers like
to write this at the beginning of their scripts to guard against
unused variables:
The disadvantage of `getopts` is that (except for ksh93 `getopts`) it can only handle short options (`-h`, not `--help`) without trickery and cannot handle options with optional arguments à la GNU.
Line 98: Line 145:
{{{
    set -u # or, set -o nounset
}}}
There is a [[http://wiki.bash-hackers.org/howto/getopts_tutorial|getopts tutorial]] which explains what all of the syntax and variables mean. In bash, there is also `help getopts`, which might be informative.
Line 102: Line 147:
=== getopts === There is also still the disadvantage that options are coded in at least 2, probably 3 places - in the call to `getopts`, in the case statement that processes them and presumably in the help message that you are going to get around to writing one of these days. This is a classic opportunity for errors to creep in as the code is written and maintained - often not discovered till much, much later. This can be avoided by using callback functions, but this approach kind of defeats the purpose of using getopts at all.
Line 104: Line 149:
'''Never use getopt(1).''' `getopt` cannot handle empty arguments
strings, or arguments with embedded whitespace. Please forget that it
ever existed.
Line 108: Line 150:
The POSIX shell (and others) offer `getopts` which is safe to use
instead. Here is a simplistic `getopts` example:

{{{#!highlight bash
#!/bin/sh

# A POSIX variable
OPTIND=1 # Reset in case getopts has been used previously in the shell.

while getopts "h?vf:" opt; do
    case "$opt" in
 h|\?)
     show_help
     exit 0
     ;;
 v) verbose=1
     ;;
 f) output_file=$OPTARG
     ;;
    esac
done

shift $((OPTIND-1))

[ "$1" = "--" ] && shift

echo "verbose=$verbose, output_file='$output_file', Leftovers: $@"

# End of file
}}}

The disadvantage of `getopts` is that it can only handle short options
(`-h`) without trickery. It handles `-vf filename` in the expected
Unix way, automatically. `getopts` is a good candidate because it is
portable and e.g. also works in dash.

There is a
[[http://wiki.bash-hackers.org/howto/getopts_tutorial|getopts tutorial]]
which explains what all of the syntax and variables mean.
In bash, there is also `help getopts`, which might be informative.

There is also still the disadvantage that options are coded in at
least 2, probably 3 places - in the call to `getopts`, in the case
statement that processes them and presumably in the help message that
you are going to get around to writing one of these days. This is a
classic opportunity for errors to creep in as the code is written and
maintained - often not discovered till much, much later. This can be
avoided by using callback functions, but this approach kind of defeats
the purpose of using getopts at all.

Here is an example which parses long options with `getopts`. The basic
idea is quite simple: just put "-:" into the optstring. This trick
requires a shell which permits the option-argument (i.e. the filename
in "-f filename") to be concatenated to the option (as in
"-ffilename"). The
[[http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/getopts.html|POSIX standard]]
says there must be a space between them; bash and dash
permit the "-ffilename" variant, but one should not rely on this
leniency if attempting to write a portable script.

{{{#!highlight bash
#!/bin/bash
# Uses bash extensions. Not portable as written.

optspec=":h-:"

while getopts "$optspec" optchar
do
    case "${optchar}" in
 -)
     case "${OPTARG}" in
       loglevel)
    eval val="\$${OPTIND}"; OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 ))
    echo "Parsing option: '--${OPTARG}', value: '${val}'" >&2
    ;;
       loglevel=*)
    val=${OPTARG#*=}
    opt=${OPTARG%=$val}
    echo "Parsing option: '--${opt}', value: '${val}'" >&2
    ;;
     esac
     ;;
 h)
     echo "usage: $0 [--loglevel[=]<value>]" >&2
     exit 2
     ;;
    esac
done

# End of file
}}}

=== Silly repeated brute-force scanning ===

Another approach is to check options with `if` statements "on demand".
A function like this one may be useful:

{{{#!highlight bash
#!/bin/bash

HaveOpt ()
{
    local needle=$1
    shift

    while [[ $1 == -* ]]
    do
 # By convention, "--" means end of options.
 case "$1" in
     --) return 1 ;;
     $needle) return 0 ;;
 esac

 shift
    done

    return 1
}

HaveOpt --quick "$@" && echo "Option quick is set"

# End of file
}}}

and it will work if script is run as:

 * YES: ./script --quick
 * YES: ./script -other --quick

but will stop on first argument with no "-" in front (or on --):

 * NO: ./script -bar foo --quick
 * NO: ./script -bar -- --quick

Of course, this approach (iterating over the argument list every time
you want to check for one) is far less efficient than just iterating
once and setting flag variables.

It also spreads the options throughout the program. The literal option
`--quick` may appear a hundred lines down inside the main body of the
program, nowhere near any other option name. This is a nightmare for
maintenance.

=== Complex nonstandard add-on utilities ===

[[http://bhepple.freeshell.org/oddmuse/wiki.cgi/process-getopt|bhepple]] suggests the use of
[[http://sourceforge.net/projects/process-getopt/|process-getopt]]
(GPL licensed) and offers this example code:

{{{
PROG=$(basename $0)
VERSION='1.2'
USAGE="A tiny example using process-getopt(1)"

# call process-getopt functions to define some options:
source process-getopt

SLOT=""
SLOT_func() { [ "${1:-""}" ] && SLOT="yes"; } # callback for SLOT option
add_opt SLOT "boolean option" s "" slot

TOKEN=""
TOKEN_func() { [ "${1:-""}" ] && TOKEN="$2"; } # callback for TOKEN option
add_opt TOKEN "this option takes a value" t n token number

add_std_opts # define the standard options --help etc:

TEMP=$(call_getopt "$@") || exit 1
eval set -- "$TEMP" # just as with getopt(1)

# remove the options from the command line
process_opts "$@" || shift "$?"

echo "SLOT=$SLOT"
echo "TOKEN=$TOKEN"
echo "args=$@"
}}}

Here, all information about each option is defined in one place making
for much easier authoring and maintenance. A lot of the dirty work is
handled automatically and standards are obeyed as in getopt(1) -
because it calls getopt for you.

 . ''Actually, what the author forgot to say was that it's actually using `getopts` semantics, rather than `getopt`. I ran this test:''
 {{{
 ~/process-getopt-1.6$ set -- one 'rm -rf /' 'foo;bar' "'"
 ~/process-getopt-1.6$ call_getopt "$@"
  -- 'rm -rf /' 'foo;bar' ''\'''
}}}
 . ''It appears to be intelligent enough to handle null options, whitespace-containing options, and single-quote-containing options in a manner that makes the [[BashFAQ/048|eval]] not blow up in your face. But this is not an endorsement of the process-getopt software overall; I don't know it well enough. -GreyCat ''

''It's written and tested on Linux where getopt(1) supports long options. For portability, it tests the local getopt(1) at runtime and if it finds an non-GNU one (ie one that does not return 4 for {{{getopt --test}}}) it only processes short options. It does not use the bash builtin getopts(1) command. -[[http://bhepple.freeshell.org/oddmuse/wiki.cgi/process-getopt|bhepple]] ''
For other, more complicated ways of option parsing, see ComplexOptionParsing.

How can I handle command-line arguments (options) to my script easily?

Well, that depends a great deal on what you want to do with them. There are several approaches, each with its strengths and weaknesses.

Manual loop

This approach handles any arbitrary set of options, because you're writing the parser yourself. For 90% of programs, this is the simplest approach (because you rarely need fancy stuff).

This example will handle a combination of short and long options. Notice how both "--file" and "--file=FILE" are handled.

   1 #!/bin/sh
   2 # (POSIX shell syntax)
   3 
   4 # Reset all variables that might be set
   5 file=
   6 verbose=0
   7 
   8 while :; do
   9     case $1 in
  10         -h|-\?|--help)   # Call a "show_help" function to display a synopsis, then exit.
  11             show_help
  12             exit
  13             ;;
  14         -f|--file)       # Takes an option argument, ensuring it has been specified.
  15             if [ "$2" ]; then
  16                 file=$2
  17                 shift 2
  18                 continue
  19             else
  20                 echo 'ERROR: Must specify a non-empty "--file FILE" argument.' >&2
  21                 exit 1
  22             fi
  23             ;;
  24         --file=?*)
  25             file=${1#*=} # Delete everything up to "=" and assign the remainder.
  26             ;;
  27         --file=)         # Handle the case of an empty --file=
  28             echo 'ERROR: Must specify a non-empty "--file FILE" argument.' >&2
  29             exit 1
  30             ;;
  31         -v|--verbose)
  32             verbose=$((verbose + 1)) # Each -v argument adds 1 to verbosity.
  33             ;;
  34         --)              # End of all options.
  35             shift
  36             break
  37             ;;
  38         -?*)
  39             printf 'WARN: Unknown option (ignored): %s\n' "$1" >&2
  40             ;;
  41         *)               # Default case: If no more options then break out of the loop.
  42             break
  43     esac
  44 
  45     command shift
  46 done
  47 
  48 # Suppose --file is a required option. Check that it has been set.
  49 if [ ! "$file" ]; then
  50     echo 'ERROR: option "--file FILE" not given. See --help.' >&2
  51     exit 1
  52 fi
  53 
  54 # Rest of the program here.
  55 # If there are input files (for example) that follow the options, they
  56 # will remain in the "$@" positional parameters.

This parser does not handle separate options concatenated together (like -xvf being understood as -x -v -f). This could be added with effort, but this is left as an exercise for the reader.

Some Bash programmers like to write this at the beginning of their scripts to guard against unused variables:

    set -u     # or, set -o nounset

The use of this breaks the loop above, as "$1" may not be set upon entering the loop. There are four solutions to this issue:

  1. Stop using -u.

  2. Replace case $1 in with case ${1+$1} in (as well as bandaging all the other code that set -u breaks).

  3. Replace case $1 in with case ${1-} in (every potentially undeclared variable could be written as ${variable-} to prevent set -u tripping).

  4. Stop using -u.

getopts

Unless it's the version from util-linux, and you use its advanced mode, never use getopt(1). Traditional versions of getopt cannot handle empty argument strings, or arguments with embedded whitespace.

The POSIX shell (and others) offer getopts which is safe to use instead. Here is a simplistic getopts example:

   1 #!/bin/sh
   2 
   3 # Usage info
   4 show_help() {
   5 cat << EOF
   6 Usage: ${0##*/} [-hv] [-f OUTFILE] [FILE]...
   7 Do stuff with FILE and write the result to standard output. With no FILE
   8 or when FILE is -, read standard input.
   9     
  10     -h          display this help and exit
  11     -f OUTFILE  write the result to OUTFILE instead of standard output.
  12     -v          verbose mode. Can be used multiple times for increased
  13                 verbosity.
  14 EOF
  15 }                
  16 
  17 # Initialize our own variables:
  18 output_file=""
  19 verbose=0
  20 
  21 OPTIND=1 # Reset is necessary if getopts was used previously in the script.  It is a good idea to make this local in a function.
  22 while getopts "hvf:" opt; do
  23     case "$opt" in
  24         h)
  25             show_help
  26             exit 0
  27             ;;
  28         v)  verbose=1
  29             ;;
  30         f)  output_file=$OPTARG
  31             ;;
  32         '?')
  33             show_help >&2
  34             exit 1
  35             ;;
  36     esac
  37 done
  38 shift "$((OPTIND-1))" # Shift off the options and optional --.
  39 
  40 printf 'verbose=<%s>\noutput_file=<%s>\nLeftovers:\n' "$verbose" "$output_file"
  41 printf '<%s>\n' "$@"
  42 
  43 # End of file

The advantages of getopts are:

  1. It's portable, and will work in any POSIX shell e.g. dash.
  2. It can handle things like -vf filename in the expected Unix way, automatically.

  3. It understands -- as the option terminator and more generally makes sure, options are parsed like for any standard command.

  4. With some implementations, the error messages will be localised in the language of the user.

The disadvantage of getopts is that (except for ksh93 getopts) it can only handle short options (-h, not --help) without trickery and cannot handle options with optional arguments à la GNU.

There is a getopts tutorial which explains what all of the syntax and variables mean. In bash, there is also help getopts, which might be informative.

There is also still the disadvantage that options are coded in at least 2, probably 3 places - in the call to getopts, in the case statement that processes them and presumably in the help message that you are going to get around to writing one of these days. This is a classic opportunity for errors to creep in as the code is written and maintained - often not discovered till much, much later. This can be avoided by using callback functions, but this approach kind of defeats the purpose of using getopts at all.

For other, more complicated ways of option parsing, see ComplexOptionParsing.


CategoryShell

BashFAQ/035 (last edited 2024-02-26 07:51:38 by larryv)