Size: 9691
Comment: Fis minor typo in option example
|
Size: 12586
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
Line 5: | Line 4: |
Well, that depends a great deal on what you want to do with them. There are several approaches, each with its strengths and weaknesses. |
Well, that depends a great deal on what you want to do with them. There are several approaches, each with its strengths and weaknesses. |
Line 12: | Line 9: |
This approach handles any arbitrary set of options, because you're writing the parser yourself. For 90% of programs, it may suffice. Here's an example that will handle a combination of short (`-v`, `-h`) and long (`--verbose`, `--help`) options; and also style `--verbose=LEVEL`. |
This approach handles any arbitrary set of options, because you're writing the parser yourself. For 90% of programs, this is the simplest approach (because you rarely need fancy stuff). This example will handle a combination of short and long options. Notice how both "--file" and "--file=FILE" are handled. |
Line 21: | Line 15: |
# # (C) Copyright 2012 Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net> # # This program is free; you can redistribute and/or modify it under # the terms of GNU General Public license either version 2 of the # License, or (at your option) any later version. Help () { # To learn what TOP LEVEL sections to use in manual page, # see POSIX/Susv standard about "Utility Description Defaults" at # http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap01.html#tag_01_11 echo " SYNOPSIS $0 [options] <argument> DESCRIPTION This program demonstrates use of options in shell scripts. Works in any POSIX compatible shell. OPTIONS -h, --help Display program help. -v, --verbose [LEVEL], --verbose=[LEVEL] Enable verbose messages. With optional LEVEL, increase verbosity. Allowed range is 1..9. " exit 0 } Die () { echo "$*" >&2 exit ${1:-1} # Exit by default with code "1" } Main () { help="" # Reset all option variables that might be set later verbose="" verbose_level="" while : do case "$1" in -h | --help) help="help" shift # Remove from argument list Help ;; --verbose=*) # If you want to support --option=VALUE style verbose="verbose" verbose_level=${1#*=} # Delete everyting up till "=" shift ;; -v | --verbose) verbose="verbose" verbose_level=1 shift # Support "--verbose LEVEL" by reading next argument. case "$1" in [0-9]) verbose_level=$1 shift ;; esac ;; --) # End of all options shift break ;; -*) echo "Unknown option: $1" >&2 shift ;; *) # no more options. Stop while loop break ;; esac done # Suppose, some options are required. Check that we got them [ "$verbose" ] || Die "Missing required option --verbose. See --help". # <Rest of your code here> } Main "$@" # End of file }}} What is ''not possible'' to do with pure shell approach, is to try to parse separate options concatenaed together. Like like `-xvf` which would understoos as `-x -v -f`. This could be possible with lot of effort, but in practise it wouldn't be worth it. You may be interested in knowing that some Bash programmers like to write this at the beginning of their scripts to guard against unused variables: |
# (POSIX shell syntax) # Reset all variables that might be set file="" verbose=0 while : do case $1 in -h | --help | -\?) # Call your Help() or usage() function here. exit 0 # This is not an error, User asked help. Don't do "exit 1" ;; -f | --file) file=$2 # You might want to check if you really got FILE shift 2 ;; --file=*) file=${1#*=} # Delete everything up till "=" shift ;; -v | --verbose) # Each instance of -v adds 1 to verbosity verbose=$((verbose+1)) shift ;; --) # End of all options shift break ;; -*) echo "WARN: Unknown option (ignored): $1" >&2 shift ;; *) # no more options. Stop while loop break ;; esac done # Suppose some options are required. Check that we got them. if [ ! "$file" ]; then echo "ERROR: option '--file FILE' not given. See --help" >&2 exit 1 fi # Rest of the program here. # If there are input files (for example) that follow the options, they # will remain in the "$@" positional parameters. }}} This parser does not handle separate options concatenated together (like `-xvf` being understood as `-x -v -f`). This could be added with effort, but this is left as an exercise for the reader. Some Bash programmers like to write this at the beginning of their scripts to guard against unused variables: |
Line 131: | Line 73: |
The use of this breaks the loop above, as "$1" may not be set upon entering the loop. There are four solutions to this issue: 1. Stop using `-u`. 1. Replace `case $1 in` with `case ${1+$1} in` (as well as bandaging all the other code that `set -u` breaks). 1. Replace `case $1 in` with `case ${1-} in` (every potentially undeclared variable could be written as ${variable-} to prevent `set -u` tripping). 1. Stop using `-u`. |
|
Line 133: | Line 81: |
'''Never use getopt(1).''' `getopt` cannot handle empty arguments strings, or arguments with embedded whitespace. Please forget that it ever existed. The POSIX shell (and others) offer `getopts` which is safe to use instead. Here is a simplistic `getopts` example: |
Unless it's the version from util-linux, and you use its advanced mode, '''never use getopt(1).''' Traditional versions of `getopt` cannot handle empty argument strings, or arguments with embedded whitespace. The POSIX shell (and others) offer `getopts` which is safe to use instead. Here is a simplistic `getopts` example: |
Line 144: | Line 88: |
# A POSIX variable OPTIND=1 # Reset in case getopts has been used previously in the shell. while getopts "h?vf:" opt; do |
# Initialize our own variables: output_file="" verbose=0 OPTIND=1 # Reset is necessary if getopts was used previously in the script. It is a good idea to make this local in a function. while getopts "hvf:" opt; do |
Line 149: | Line 95: |
h|\?) show_help exit 0 ;; v) verbose=1 ;; f) output_file=$OPTARG ;; esac done shift $((OPTIND-1)) [ "$1" = "--" ] && shift |
h) show_help exit 0 ;; v) verbose=1 ;; f) output_file=$OPTARG ;; '?') show_help >&2 exit 1 ;; esac done shift $((OPTIND-1)) # Shift off the options and optional --. |
Line 168: | Line 115: |
The disadvantage of `getopts` is that it can only handle short options (`-h`) without trickery. It handles `-vf filename` in the expected Unix way, automatically. `getopts` is a good candidate because it is portable and e.g. also works in dash. There is a [[http://wiki.bash-hackers.org/howto/getopts_tutorial|getopts tutorial]] which explains what all of the syntax and variables mean. In bash, there is also `help getopts`, which might be informative. There is also still the disadvantage that options are coded in at least 2, probably 3 places - in the call to `getopts`, in the case statement that processes them and presumably in the help message that you are going to get around to writing one of these days. This is a classic opportunity for errors to creep in as the code is written and maintained - often not discovered till much, much later. This can be avoided by using callback functions, but this approach kind of defeats the purpose of using getopts at all. Here is an example which parses long options with `getopts`. The basic idea is quite simple: just put "-:" into the optstring. This trick requires a shell which permits the option-argument (i.e. the filename in "-f filename") to be concatenated to the option (as in "-ffilename"). The [[http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/getopts.html|POSIX standard]] says there must be a space between them; bash and dash permit the "-ffilename" variant, but one should not rely on this leniency if attempting to write a portable script. |
The advantages of `getopts` are: 1. It's portable, and will work in any POSIX shell e.g. dash. 1. It can handle things like `-vf filename` in the expected Unix way, automatically. 1. It understands `--` as the option terminator and more generally makes sure, options are parsed like for any standard command. 1. With some implementations, the error messages will be localised in the language of the user. The disadvantage of `getopts` is that (except for ksh93 `getopts`) it can only handle short options (`-h`, not `--help`) without trickery and cannot handle options with optional arguments à la GNU. There is a [[http://wiki.bash-hackers.org/howto/getopts_tutorial|getopts tutorial]] which explains what all of the syntax and variables mean. In bash, there is also `help getopts`, which might be informative. There is also still the disadvantage that options are coded in at least 2, probably 3 places - in the call to `getopts`, in the case statement that processes them and presumably in the help message that you are going to get around to writing one of these days. This is a classic opportunity for errors to creep in as the code is written and maintained - often not discovered till much, much later. This can be avoided by using callback functions, but this approach kind of defeats the purpose of using getopts at all. ==== getopts long option trickery ==== Here is an example which claims to parse long options with `getopts`. The basic idea is quite simple: just put "-:" into the optstring. This trick requires a shell which permits the option-argument (i.e. the filename in "-f filename") to be concatenated to the option (as in "-ffilename") as POSIX requires. The [[http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/getopts.html|POSIX standard]] says you should pass arguments to options as separate options (to avoid problems with empty arguments) but requires `getopts` to handle the case where the argument is stuck to the option in the same argument. However, POSIX leaves the behaviour unspecified when an option is not alpha-numerical, so POSIX does not guarantee this to work. However, it should work in all of bash, dash, yash, zsh and all implementations of `ksh`, the only exception reported so far being `posh`. |
Line 207: | Line 142: |
-) case "${OPTARG}" in loglevel) eval val="\$${OPTIND}"; OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 )) echo "Parsing option: '--${OPTARG}', value: '${val}'" >&2 ;; loglevel=*) val=${OPTARG#*=} opt=${OPTARG%=$val} echo "Parsing option: '--${opt}', value: '${val}'" >&2 ;; esac ;; h) echo "usage: $0 [--loglevel[=]<value>]" >&2 exit 2 ;; esac done }}} |
-) case "${OPTARG}" in loglevel) eval val="\$${OPTIND}"; OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 )) echo "Parsing option: '--${OPTARG}', value: '${val}'" >&2 ;; loglevel=*) val=${OPTARG#*=} opt=${OPTARG%=$val} echo "Parsing option: '--${opt}', value: '${val}'" >&2 ;; esac ;; h) echo "usage: $0 [--loglevel[=]<value>]" >&2 exit 2 ;; esac done # End of file }}} In practice, this example is so obfuscated that it may be preferable to add concatenated option support (like `-vf filename`) to a manual parsing loop instead, if that was the only reason for using `getopts`. Here's an improved and more generalized version of above attempt to add support for long options when using `getopts`: {{{#!highlight bash #!/bin/bash # Uses bash extensions. Not portable as written. declare -A longoptspec longoptspec=( [loglevel]=1 ) #use associative array to declare how many arguments a long option expects, in this case we declare that loglevel expects/has one argument, long options that aren't listed in this way will have zero arguments by default optspec=":h-:" while getopts "$optspec" opt; do while true; do case "${opt}" in -) #OPTARG is name-of-long-option or name-of-long-option=value if [[ "${OPTARG}" =~ .*=.* ]] #with this --key=value format only one argument is possible then opt=${OPTARG/=*/} OPTARG=${OPTARG#*=} ((OPTIND--)) else #with this --key value1 value2 format multiple arguments are possible opt="$OPTARG" OPTARG=(${@:OPTIND:$((longoptspec[$opt]))}) fi ((OPTIND+=longoptspec[$opt])) continue #now that opt/OPTARG are set we can process them as if getopts would've given us long options ;; loglevel) loglevel=$OPTARG ;; h|help) echo "usage: $0 [--loglevel[=]<value>]" >&2 exit 2 ;; esac break; done done # End of file }}} With this version you can have long and short options side by side and you shouldn't need to modify the code from line 10 to 22. This solution can also handle multiple arguments for long options, just use ${OPTARG} or ${OPTARG[0]} for the first argument, ${OPTARG[1]} for the second argument, ${OPTARG[2]} for the third argument and so on. It has the same disadvantage of its predecessor in not being portable and specific to bash. Additionally, it breaks arguments with whitespace (line 18) for long options, when given using the syntax that does not include equal sign (=). |
Line 229: | Line 207: |
Another approach is to check options with `if` statements "on demand". A function like this one may be useful: |
Another approach is to check options with `if` statements "on demand". A function like this one may be useful: |
Line 243: | Line 219: |
# By convention, "--" means end of options. case "$1" in --) return 1 ;; $needle) return 0 ;; esac shift |
# By convention, "--" means end of options. case "$1" in --) return 1 ;; $needle) return 0 ;; esac shift |
Line 259: | Line 235: |
Line 270: | Line 245: |
Of course, this approach (iterating over the argument list every time you want to check for one) is far less efficient than just iterating once and setting flag variables. It also spreads the options throughout the program. The literal option `--quick` may appear a hundred lines down inside the main body of the program, nowhere near any other option name. This is a nightmare for maintenance. |
Of course, this approach (iterating over the argument list every time you want to check for one) is far less efficient than just iterating once and setting flag variables. It also spreads the options throughout the program. The literal option `--quick` may appear a hundred lines down inside the main body of the program, nowhere near any other option name. This is a nightmare for maintenance. |
Line 280: | Line 250: |
Line 311: | Line 280: |
Here, all information about each option is defined in one place making for much easier authoring and maintenance. A lot of the dirty work is handled automatically and standards are obeyed as in getopt(1) - because it calls getopt for you. |
Here, all information about each option is defined in one place making for much easier authoring and maintenance. A lot of the dirty work is handled automatically and standards are obeyed as in getopt(1) - because it calls getopt for you. |
How can I handle command-line arguments (options) to my script easily?
Well, that depends a great deal on what you want to do with them. There are several approaches, each with its strengths and weaknesses.
Contents
Manual loop
This approach handles any arbitrary set of options, because you're writing the parser yourself. For 90% of programs, this is the simplest approach (because you rarely need fancy stuff).
This example will handle a combination of short and long options. Notice how both "--file" and "--file=FILE" are handled.
1 #!/bin/sh
2 # (POSIX shell syntax)
3
4 # Reset all variables that might be set
5 file=""
6 verbose=0
7
8 while :
9 do
10 case $1 in
11 -h | --help | -\?)
12 # Call your Help() or usage() function here.
13 exit 0 # This is not an error, User asked help. Don't do "exit 1"
14 ;;
15 -f | --file)
16 file=$2 # You might want to check if you really got FILE
17 shift 2
18 ;;
19 --file=*)
20 file=${1#*=} # Delete everything up till "="
21 shift
22 ;;
23 -v | --verbose)
24 # Each instance of -v adds 1 to verbosity
25 verbose=$((verbose+1))
26 shift
27 ;;
28 --) # End of all options
29 shift
30 break
31 ;;
32 -*)
33 echo "WARN: Unknown option (ignored): $1" >&2
34 shift
35 ;;
36 *) # no more options. Stop while loop
37 break
38 ;;
39 esac
40 done
41
42 # Suppose some options are required. Check that we got them.
43
44 if [ ! "$file" ]; then
45 echo "ERROR: option '--file FILE' not given. See --help" >&2
46 exit 1
47 fi
48
49 # Rest of the program here.
50 # If there are input files (for example) that follow the options, they
51 # will remain in the "$@" positional parameters.
This parser does not handle separate options concatenated together (like -xvf being understood as -x -v -f). This could be added with effort, but this is left as an exercise for the reader.
Some Bash programmers like to write this at the beginning of their scripts to guard against unused variables:
set -u # or, set -o nounset
The use of this breaks the loop above, as "$1" may not be set upon entering the loop. There are four solutions to this issue:
Stop using -u.
Replace case $1 in with case ${1+$1} in (as well as bandaging all the other code that set -u breaks).
Replace case $1 in with case ${1-} in (every potentially undeclared variable could be written as ${variable-} to prevent set -u tripping).
Stop using -u.
getopts
Unless it's the version from util-linux, and you use its advanced mode, never use getopt(1). Traditional versions of getopt cannot handle empty argument strings, or arguments with embedded whitespace.
The POSIX shell (and others) offer getopts which is safe to use instead. Here is a simplistic getopts example:
1 #!/bin/sh
2
3 # Initialize our own variables:
4 output_file=""
5 verbose=0
6
7 OPTIND=1 # Reset is necessary if getopts was used previously in the script. It is a good idea to make this local in a function.
8 while getopts "hvf:" opt; do
9 case "$opt" in
10 h)
11 show_help
12 exit 0
13 ;;
14 v) verbose=1
15 ;;
16 f) output_file=$OPTARG
17 ;;
18 '?')
19 show_help >&2
20 exit 1
21 ;;
22 esac
23 done
24 shift $((OPTIND-1)) # Shift off the options and optional --.
25
26 echo "verbose=$verbose, output_file='$output_file', Leftovers: $@"
27
28 # End of file
The advantages of getopts are:
- It's portable, and will work in any POSIX shell e.g. dash.
It can handle things like -vf filename in the expected Unix way, automatically.
It understands -- as the option terminator and more generally makes sure, options are parsed like for any standard command.
- With some implementations, the error messages will be localised in the language of the user.
The disadvantage of getopts is that (except for ksh93 getopts) it can only handle short options (-h, not --help) without trickery and cannot handle options with optional arguments à la GNU.
There is a getopts tutorial which explains what all of the syntax and variables mean. In bash, there is also help getopts, which might be informative.
There is also still the disadvantage that options are coded in at least 2, probably 3 places - in the call to getopts, in the case statement that processes them and presumably in the help message that you are going to get around to writing one of these days. This is a classic opportunity for errors to creep in as the code is written and maintained - often not discovered till much, much later. This can be avoided by using callback functions, but this approach kind of defeats the purpose of using getopts at all.
1. getopts long option trickery
Here is an example which claims to parse long options with getopts. The basic idea is quite simple: just put "-:" into the optstring. This trick requires a shell which permits the option-argument (i.e. the filename in "-f filename") to be concatenated to the option (as in "-ffilename") as POSIX requires. The POSIX standard says you should pass arguments to options as separate options (to avoid problems with empty arguments) but requires getopts to handle the case where the argument is stuck to the option in the same argument. However, POSIX leaves the behaviour unspecified when an option is not alpha-numerical, so POSIX does not guarantee this to work. However, it should work in all of bash, dash, yash, zsh and all implementations of ksh, the only exception reported so far being posh.
1 #!/bin/bash
2 # Uses bash extensions. Not portable as written.
3
4 optspec=":h-:"
5
6 while getopts "$optspec" optchar
7 do
8 case "${optchar}" in
9 -)
10 case "${OPTARG}" in
11 loglevel)
12 eval val="\$${OPTIND}"; OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 ))
13 echo "Parsing option: '--${OPTARG}', value: '${val}'" >&2
14 ;;
15 loglevel=*)
16 val=${OPTARG#*=}
17 opt=${OPTARG%=$val}
18 echo "Parsing option: '--${opt}', value: '${val}'" >&2
19 ;;
20 esac
21 ;;
22 h)
23 echo "usage: $0 [--loglevel[=]<value>]" >&2
24 exit 2
25 ;;
26 esac
27 done
28
29 # End of file
In practice, this example is so obfuscated that it may be preferable to add concatenated option support (like -vf filename) to a manual parsing loop instead, if that was the only reason for using getopts.
Here's an improved and more generalized version of above attempt to add support for long options when using getopts:
1 #!/bin/bash
2 # Uses bash extensions. Not portable as written.
3
4 declare -A longoptspec
5 longoptspec=( [loglevel]=1 ) #use associative array to declare how many arguments a long option expects, in this case we declare that loglevel expects/has one argument, long options that aren't listed in this way will have zero arguments by default
6 optspec=":h-:"
7 while getopts "$optspec" opt; do
8 while true; do
9 case "${opt}" in
10 -) #OPTARG is name-of-long-option or name-of-long-option=value
11 if [[ "${OPTARG}" =~ .*=.* ]] #with this --key=value format only one argument is possible
12 then
13 opt=${OPTARG/=*/}
14 OPTARG=${OPTARG#*=}
15 ((OPTIND--))
16 else #with this --key value1 value2 format multiple arguments are possible
17 opt="$OPTARG"
18 OPTARG=(${@:OPTIND:$((longoptspec[$opt]))})
19 fi
20 ((OPTIND+=longoptspec[$opt]))
21 continue #now that opt/OPTARG are set we can process them as if getopts would've given us long options
22 ;;
23 loglevel)
24 loglevel=$OPTARG
25 ;;
26 h|help)
27 echo "usage: $0 [--loglevel[=]<value>]" >&2
28 exit 2
29 ;;
30 esac
31 break; done
32 done
33
34 # End of file
With this version you can have long and short options side by side and you shouldn't need to modify the code from line 10 to 22. This solution can also handle multiple arguments for long options, just use ${OPTARG} or ${OPTARG[0]} for the first argument, ${OPTARG[1]} for the second argument, ${OPTARG[2]} for the third argument and so on. It has the same disadvantage of its predecessor in not being portable and specific to bash. Additionally, it breaks arguments with whitespace (line 18) for long options, when given using the syntax that does not include equal sign (=).
Silly repeated brute-force scanning
Another approach is to check options with if statements "on demand". A function like this one may be useful:
1 #!/bin/bash
2
3 HaveOpt ()
4 {
5 local needle=$1
6 shift
7
8 while [[ $1 == -* ]]
9 do
10 # By convention, "--" means end of options.
11 case "$1" in
12 --) return 1 ;;
13 $needle) return 0 ;;
14 esac
15
16 shift
17 done
18
19 return 1
20 }
21
22 HaveOpt --quick "$@" && echo "Option quick is set"
23
24 # End of file
and it will work if script is run as:
- YES: ./script --quick
- YES: ./script -other --quick
but will stop on first argument with no "-" in front (or on --):
- NO: ./script -bar foo --quick
- NO: ./script -bar -- --quick
Of course, this approach (iterating over the argument list every time you want to check for one) is far less efficient than just iterating once and setting flag variables.
It also spreads the options throughout the program. The literal option --quick may appear a hundred lines down inside the main body of the program, nowhere near any other option name. This is a nightmare for maintenance.
Complex nonstandard add-on utilities
bhepple suggests the use of process-getopt (GPL licensed) and offers this example code:
PROG=$(basename $0) VERSION='1.2' USAGE="A tiny example using process-getopt(1)" # call process-getopt functions to define some options: source process-getopt SLOT="" SLOT_func() { [ "${1:-""}" ] && SLOT="yes"; } # callback for SLOT option add_opt SLOT "boolean option" s "" slot TOKEN="" TOKEN_func() { [ "${1:-""}" ] && TOKEN="$2"; } # callback for TOKEN option add_opt TOKEN "this option takes a value" t n token number add_std_opts # define the standard options --help etc: TEMP=$(call_getopt "$@") || exit 1 eval set -- "$TEMP" # just as with getopt(1) # remove the options from the command line process_opts "$@" || shift "$?" echo "SLOT=$SLOT" echo "TOKEN=$TOKEN" echo "args=$@"
Here, all information about each option is defined in one place making for much easier authoring and maintenance. A lot of the dirty work is handled automatically and standards are obeyed as in getopt(1) - because it calls getopt for you.
Actually, what the author forgot to say was that it's actually using getopts semantics, rather than getopt. I ran this test:
~/process-getopt-1.6$ set -- one 'rm -rf /' 'foo;bar' "'" ~/process-getopt-1.6$ call_getopt "$@" -- 'rm -rf /' 'foo;bar' ''\'''
It appears to be intelligent enough to handle null options, whitespace-containing options, and single-quote-containing options in a manner that makes the eval not blow up in your face. But this is not an endorsement of the process-getopt software overall; I don't know it well enough. -GreyCat
It's written and tested on Linux where getopt(1) supports long options. For portability, it tests the local getopt(1) at runtime and if it finds an non-GNU one (ie one that does not return 4 for getopt --test) it only processes short options. It does not use the bash builtin getopts(1) command. -bhepple