Differences between revisions 40 and 90 (spanning 50 versions)
Revision 40 as of 2011-10-21 22:41:22
Size: 9215
Editor: GreyCat
Comment: add TOC
Revision 90 as of 2015-01-05 13:29:08
Size: 5539
Editor: GreyCat
Comment: OK, fine. You set -u people can have this battle. But not the war. You will NOT get to put set -u at the top of an example. Also, why did you add a second row of category tags, with a duplicate?
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
Line 4: Line 5:
Well, that depends a great deal on what you want to do with them.  There are several approaches, each with its strengths and weaknesses. Well, that depends a great deal on what you want to do with them. There are several approaches, each with its strengths and weaknesses.
Line 9: Line 10:
This approach handles any arbitrary set of options, because you're writing the parser yourself.  For 90% of programs, this turns out to be the simplest and most direct approach, since very few scripts need complicated option processing. This approach handles any arbitrary set of options, because you're writing the parser yourself. For 90% of programs, this is the simplest approach (because you rarely need fancy stuff).
Line 11: Line 12:
Here's an example that will handle a combination of short (`-h`) and long (`--help`) options. This example will handle a combination of short and long options. Notice how both "--file" and "--file=FILE" are handled.
Line 13: Line 14:
{{{
# Bash
while [[ $1 == -* ]]; do
    case "$1" in
      -h|--help|-\?) show_help; exit 0;;
      -v|--verbose) verbose=1; shift;;
      -f) if (($# > 1)); then
            output_file=$2; shift 2
          else
            echo "-f requires an argument" 1>&2
{{{#!highlight bash
#!/bin/sh
# (POSIX shell syntax)

# Reset all variables that might be set
file=
verbose=0

while [ "$#" -gt 0 ]; do
    case $1 in
        -h|-\?|--help) # Call a "show_help" function to display a synopsis, then exit.
            show_help
            exit
            ;;
        -f|--file) # Takes an option argument, ensuring it has been specified.
            if [ "$#" -gt 1 ]; then
                file=$2
                shift 2
                continue
            else
                echo 'ERROR: Must specify a non-empty "--file FILE" argument.' >&2
                exit 1
            fi
            ;;
        --file=?*)
            file=${1#*=} # Delete everything up to "=" and assign the remainder.
            ;;
        --file=) # Handle the case of an empty --file=
            echo 'ERROR: Must specify a non-empty "--file FILE" argument.' >&2
Line 24: Line 44:
          fi ;;
      --) shift; break;;
      -*) echo "invalid option: $1" 1>&2; show_help; exit 1;;
            ;;
        -v|--verbose)
            verbose=$((verbose + 1)) # Each -v argument adds 1 to verbosity.
            ;;
        --) # End of all options.
            shift
            break
            ;;
        -?*)
            printf 'WARN: Unknown option (ignored): %s\n' "$1" >&2
            ;;
        *) # Default case: If no more options then break out of the loop.
            break
    esac

    shift
done

# Suppose --file is a required option. Check that it has been set.
if [ ! "$file" ]; then
    echo 'ERROR: option "--file FILE" not given. See --help.' >&2
    exit 1
fi

# Rest of the program here.
# If there are input files (for example) that follow the options, they
# will remain in the "$@" positional parameters.
}}}
This parser does not handle separate options concatenated together (like `-xvf` being understood as `-x -v -f`). This could be added with effort, but this is left as an exercise for the reader.

=== getopts ===
Unless it's the version from util-linux, and you use its advanced mode, '''never use getopt(1).''' Traditional versions of `getopt` cannot handle empty argument strings, or arguments with embedded whitespace.

The POSIX shell (and others) offer `getopts` which is safe to use instead. Here is a simplistic `getopts` example:

{{{#!highlight bash
#!/bin/sh

# Usage info
show_help() {
cat << EOF
Usage: ${0##*/} [-hv] [-f OUTFILE] [FILE]...
Do stuff with FILE and write the result to standard output. With no FILE
or when FILE is -, read standard input.

    -h display this help and exit
    -f OUTFILE write the result to OUTFILE instead of standard output.
    -v verbose mode. Can be used multiple times for increased
                verbosity.
EOF
}

# Initialize our own variables:
output_file=""
verbose=0

OPTIND=1 # Reset is necessary if getopts was used previously in the script. It is a good idea to make this local in a function.
while getopts "hvf:" opt; do
    case "$opt" in
        h)
            show_help
            exit 0
            ;;
        v) verbose=$((verbose+1))
            ;;
        f) output_file=$OPTARG
            ;;
        '?')
            show_help >&2
            exit 1
            ;;
Line 29: Line 117:
shift "$((OPTIND-1))" # Shift off the options and optional --.

printf 'verbose=<%d>\noutput_file=<%s>\nLeftovers:\n' "$verbose" "$output_file"
printf '<%s>\n' "$@"

# End of file
Line 30: Line 124:
Now all of the remaining arguments are the filenames which followed the optional switches. You can process those with `for i` or `"$@"`. The advantages of `getopts` are:
Line 32: Line 126:
A POSIX version of that same code:  1. It's portable, and will work in any POSIX shell e.g. dash.
 1. It can handle things like `-vf filename` in the expected Unix way, automatically.
 1. It understands `--` as the option terminator and more generally makes sure, options are parsed like for any standard command.
 1. With some implementations, the error messages will be localised in the language of the user.
Line 34: Line 131:
{{{
# POSIX
while true; do
    case "$1" in
      -h|--help|-\?) show_help; exit 0;;
      -v|--verbose) verbose=1; shift;;
      -f) if [ $# -gt 1 ]; then
            output_file=$2; shift 2
          else
            echo "-f requires an argument" 1>&2
            exit 1
          fi ;;
      --) shift; break;;
      -*) echo "invalid option: $1" 1>&2; show_help; exit 1;;
      *) break;;
    esac
done
}}}
Some Bash programmers write this at the beginning of their scripts:

{{{
    set -u
    # or, set -o nounset
}}}
This way Bash stops if it's forced to work with the value of an unset variable. If you use `set -o nounset`, the Bash version of the "manual loop" shown above may break, if there are no additional non-option arguments. It can be fixed thus:

{{{
# Bash (with set -u)
while [[ ${1+defined} && $1 == -* ]]; do
    case "$1" in
      -h|--help|-\?) show_help; exit 0;;
      -v|--verbose) verbose=1; shift;;
      -f) if (($# > 1)); then
            output_file=$2; shift 2
          else
            echo "-f requires an argument" 1>&2
            exit 1
          fi ;;
      --) shift; break;;
      -*) echo "invalid option: $1" 1>&2; show_help; exit 1;;
    esac
done
}}}
Of course, a simpler fix would be ''not to use'' `set -u` in the first place; or at least to use it only after the option processing is finished.

What these examples ''do not'' handle are:

 * You want things like `-xvf` to be handled as three separate flags (equivalent to `-x -v -f`).
 * You want to parse arguments out of `--file=bar`.

It's certainly possible to do those things by changing the code, but at least in the first case, there's another approach that handles that automatically.

=== getopts ===
'''Never use getopt(1).''' `getopt` cannot handle empty arguments strings, or arguments with embedded whitespace. Please forget that it ever existed.

The POSIX shell (and others) offer `getopts` which is safe to use instead. Here is a simplistic `getopts` example:

{{{
# POSIX
OPTIND=1 # Reset in case getopts has been used previously in the shell.
while getopts "h?vf:" opt; do
  case "$opt" in
    h|\?) show_help; exit 0;;
    v) verbose=1;;
    f) output_file=$OPTARG;;
  esac
done
shift $((OPTIND-1))
if [ "$1" = -- ]; then shift; fi
echo "verbose=$verbose, output_file='$output_file', Leftovers: $@"
}}}
The disadvantage of `getopts` is that it can only handle short options (`-h`) without trickery. It handles `-vf filename` in the expected Unix way, automatically. `getopts` is a good candidate because it is portable and e.g. also works in dash.
The disadvantage of `getopts` is that (except for ksh93 `getopts`) it can only handle short options (`-h`, not `--help`) without trickery and cannot handle options with optional arguments à la GNU.
Line 111: Line 137:
Here is an example which parses long options with `getopts`. The basic idea is quite simple: just put "-:" into the optstring. This trick requires a shell which permits the option-argument (i.e. the filename in "-f filename") to be concatenated to the option (as in "-ffilename"). The [[http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/getopts.html|POSIX standard]] says there must be a space between them; bash and dash permit the "-ffilename" variant, but one should not rely on this leniency if attempting to write a portable script.

{{{#!highlight bash
#!/bin/bash
# Uses bash extensions. Not portable as written.
optspec=":h-:"
while getopts "$optspec" optchar; do
  case "${optchar}" in
    -)
      case "${OPTARG}" in
        loglevel)
          eval val="\$${OPTIND}"; OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 ))
          echo "Parsing option: '--${OPTARG}', value: '${val}'" >&2;
          ;;
        loglevel=*)
          val=${OPTARG#*=}
          opt=${OPTARG%=$val}
          echo "Parsing option: '--${opt}', value: '${val}'" >&2
          ;;
      esac;;
    h)
      echo "usage: $0 [--loglevel[=]<value>]" >&2
      exit 2
      ;;
  esac
done
}}}
=== Silly repeated brute-force scanning ===
Another approach is to check options with `if` statements "on demand". A function like this one may be useful:

{{{
# Bash
HaveOpt() {
  local needle=$1
  shift
  while [[ $1 == -* ]]; do
    case "$1" in
      --) return 1;; # by convention, -- is end of options
      $needle) return 0;;
    esac
    shift
  done
  return 1
}
if HaveOpt --quick "$@"; then echo "Option quick is set"; fi
}}}
and it will work if script is run as:

 * YES: ./script --quick
 * YES: ./script -other --quick

but will stop on first argument with no "-" in front (or on --):

 * NO: ./script -bar foo --quick
 * NO: ./script -bar -- --quick

Of course, this approach (iterating over the argument list every time you want to check for one) is far less efficient than just iterating once and setting flag variables.

It also spreads the options throughout the program. The literal option `--quick` may appear a hundred lines down inside the main body of the program, nowhere near any other option name. This is a nightmare for maintenance.

=== Complex nonstandard add-on utilities ===
[[http://bhepple.freeshell.org/oddmuse/wiki.cgi/process-getopt|bhepple]] suggests the use of [[http://sourceforge.net/projects/process-getopt/|process-getopt]] (GPL licensed) and offers this example code:

{{{
PROG=$(basename $0)
VERSION='1.2'
USAGE="A tiny example using process-getopt(1)"

# call process-getopt functions to define some options:
source process-getopt

SLOT=""
SLOT_func() { [ "${1:-""}" ] && SLOT="yes"; } # callback for SLOT option
add_opt SLOT "boolean option" s "" slot

TOKEN=""
TOKEN_func() { [ "${1:-""}" ] && TOKEN="$2"; } # callback for TOKEN option
add_opt TOKEN "this option takes a value" t n token number

add_std_opts # define the standard options --help etc:

TEMP=$(call_getopt "$@") || exit 1
eval set -- "$TEMP" # just as with getopt(1)

# remove the options from the command line
process_opts "$@" || shift "$?"

echo "SLOT=$SLOT"
echo "TOKEN=$TOKEN"
echo "args=$@"
}}}
Here, all information about each option is defined in one place making for much easier authoring and maintenance. A lot of the dirty work is handled automatically and standards are obeyed as in getopt(1) - because it calls getopt for you.

 . ''Actually, what the author forgot to say was that it's actually using `getopts` semantics, rather than `getopt`. I ran this test:''
 {{{
 wooledg@wooledg:~/process-getopt-1.6$ set -- one 'rm -rf /' 'foo;bar' "'"
 wooledg@wooledg:~/process-getopt-1.6$ call_getopt "$@"
  -- 'rm -rf /' 'foo;bar' ''\'''
}}}
 . ''It appears to be intelligent enough to handle null options, whitespace-containing options, and single-quote-containing options in a manner that makes the [[BashFAQ/048|eval]] not blow up in your face. But this is not an endorsement of the process-getopt software overall; I don't know it well enough. -GreyCat ''

''It's written and tested on Linux where getopt(1) supports long options. For portability, it tests the local getopt(1) at runtime and if it finds an non-GNU one (ie one that does not return 4 for {{{getopt --test}}}) it only processes short options. It does not use the bash builtin getopts(1) command. -[[http://bhepple.freeshell.org/oddmuse/wiki.cgi/process-getopt|bhepple]] ''
For other, more complicated ways of option parsing, see ComplexOptionParsing.
Line 215: Line 140:
'' CategoryShell '' CategoryShell

How can I handle command-line arguments (options) to my script easily?

Well, that depends a great deal on what you want to do with them. There are several approaches, each with its strengths and weaknesses.

Manual loop

This approach handles any arbitrary set of options, because you're writing the parser yourself. For 90% of programs, this is the simplest approach (because you rarely need fancy stuff).

This example will handle a combination of short and long options. Notice how both "--file" and "--file=FILE" are handled.

   1 #!/bin/sh
   2 # (POSIX shell syntax)
   3 
   4 # Reset all variables that might be set
   5 file=
   6 verbose=0
   7 
   8 while [ "$#" -gt 0 ]; do
   9     case $1 in
  10         -h|-\?|--help)   # Call a "show_help" function to display a synopsis, then exit.
  11             show_help
  12             exit
  13             ;;
  14         -f|--file)       # Takes an option argument, ensuring it has been specified.
  15             if [ "$#" -gt 1 ]; then
  16                 file=$2
  17                 shift 2
  18                 continue
  19             else
  20                 echo 'ERROR: Must specify a non-empty "--file FILE" argument.' >&2
  21                 exit 1
  22             fi
  23             ;;
  24         --file=?*)
  25             file=${1#*=} # Delete everything up to "=" and assign the remainder.
  26             ;;
  27         --file=)         # Handle the case of an empty --file=
  28             echo 'ERROR: Must specify a non-empty "--file FILE" argument.' >&2
  29             exit 1
  30             ;;
  31         -v|--verbose)
  32             verbose=$((verbose + 1)) # Each -v argument adds 1 to verbosity.
  33             ;;
  34         --)              # End of all options.
  35             shift
  36             break
  37             ;;
  38         -?*)
  39             printf 'WARN: Unknown option (ignored): %s\n' "$1" >&2
  40             ;;
  41         *)               # Default case: If no more options then break out of the loop.
  42             break
  43     esac
  44 
  45     shift
  46 done
  47 
  48 # Suppose --file is a required option. Check that it has been set.
  49 if [ ! "$file" ]; then
  50     echo 'ERROR: option "--file FILE" not given. See --help.' >&2
  51     exit 1
  52 fi
  53 
  54 # Rest of the program here.
  55 # If there are input files (for example) that follow the options, they
  56 # will remain in the "$@" positional parameters.

This parser does not handle separate options concatenated together (like -xvf being understood as -x -v -f). This could be added with effort, but this is left as an exercise for the reader.

getopts

Unless it's the version from util-linux, and you use its advanced mode, never use getopt(1). Traditional versions of getopt cannot handle empty argument strings, or arguments with embedded whitespace.

The POSIX shell (and others) offer getopts which is safe to use instead. Here is a simplistic getopts example:

   1 #!/bin/sh
   2 
   3 # Usage info
   4 show_help() {
   5 cat << EOF
   6 Usage: ${0##*/} [-hv] [-f OUTFILE] [FILE]...
   7 Do stuff with FILE and write the result to standard output. With no FILE
   8 or when FILE is -, read standard input.
   9 
  10     -h          display this help and exit
  11     -f OUTFILE  write the result to OUTFILE instead of standard output.
  12     -v          verbose mode. Can be used multiple times for increased
  13                 verbosity.
  14 EOF
  15 }
  16 
  17 # Initialize our own variables:
  18 output_file=""
  19 verbose=0
  20 
  21 OPTIND=1 # Reset is necessary if getopts was used previously in the script.  It is a good idea to make this local in a function.
  22 while getopts "hvf:" opt; do
  23     case "$opt" in
  24         h)
  25             show_help
  26             exit 0
  27             ;;
  28         v)  verbose=$((verbose+1))
  29             ;;
  30         f)  output_file=$OPTARG
  31             ;;
  32         '?')
  33             show_help >&2
  34             exit 1
  35             ;;
  36     esac
  37 done
  38 shift "$((OPTIND-1))" # Shift off the options and optional --.
  39 
  40 printf 'verbose=<%d>\noutput_file=<%s>\nLeftovers:\n' "$verbose" "$output_file"
  41 printf '<%s>\n' "$@"
  42 
  43 # End of file

The advantages of getopts are:

  1. It's portable, and will work in any POSIX shell e.g. dash.
  2. It can handle things like -vf filename in the expected Unix way, automatically.

  3. It understands -- as the option terminator and more generally makes sure, options are parsed like for any standard command.

  4. With some implementations, the error messages will be localised in the language of the user.

The disadvantage of getopts is that (except for ksh93 getopts) it can only handle short options (-h, not --help) without trickery and cannot handle options with optional arguments à la GNU.

There is a getopts tutorial which explains what all of the syntax and variables mean. In bash, there is also help getopts, which might be informative.

There is also still the disadvantage that options are coded in at least 2, probably 3 places - in the call to getopts, in the case statement that processes them and presumably in the help message that you are going to get around to writing one of these days. This is a classic opportunity for errors to creep in as the code is written and maintained - often not discovered till much, much later. This can be avoided by using callback functions, but this approach kind of defeats the purpose of using getopts at all.

For other, more complicated ways of option parsing, see ComplexOptionParsing.


CategoryShell

BashFAQ/035 (last edited 2024-02-26 07:51:38 by larryv)