Differences between revisions 3 and 90 (spanning 87 versions)
Revision 3 as of 2008-03-02 17:55:00
Size: 2047
Editor: GreyCat
Comment: formatting and grammar fixes
Revision 90 as of 2015-01-05 13:29:08
Size: 5539
Editor: GreyCat
Comment: OK, fine. You set -u people can have this battle. But not the war. You will NOT get to put set -u at the top of an example. Also, why did you add a second row of category tags, with a duplicate?
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Anchor(faq35)]]
== How can I handle command-line arguments to my script easily? ==
Well, that depends a great deal on what you want to do with them. Here's a general template that might help for the simple cases:
#pragma section-numbers 3
<<Anchor(faq35)>>
Line 5: Line 4:
{{{
    while [[ $1 == -* ]]; do
        case "$1" in
          -h|--help) show_help; exit 0;;
          -v) verbose=1; shift;;
          -f) output_file=$2; shift 2;;
        esac
    done
    # Now all of the remaining arguments are the filenames which followed
    # the optional switches. You can process those with "for i" or "$@".
== How can I handle command-line arguments (options) to my script easily? ==
Well, that depends a great deal on what you want to do with them. There are several approaches, each with its strengths and weaknesses.

<<TableOfContents>>

=== Manual loop ===
This approach handles any arbitrary set of options, because you're writing the parser yourself. For 90% of programs, this is the simplest approach (because you rarely need fancy stuff).

This example will handle a combination of short and long options. Notice how both "--file" and "--file=FILE" are handled.

{{{#!highlight bash
#!/bin/sh
# (POSIX shell syntax)

# Reset all variables that might be set
file=
verbose=0

while [ "$#" -gt 0 ]; do
    case $1 in
        -h|-\?|--help) # Call a "show_help" function to display a synopsis, then exit.
            show_help
            exit
            ;;
        -f|--file) # Takes an option argument, ensuring it has been specified.
            if [ "$#" -gt 1 ]; then
                file=$2
                shift 2
                continue
            else
                echo 'ERROR: Must specify a non-empty "--file FILE" argument.' >&2
                exit 1
            fi
            ;;
        --file=?*)
            file=${1#*=} # Delete everything up to "=" and assign the remainder.
            ;;
        --file=) # Handle the case of an empty --file=
            echo 'ERROR: Must specify a non-empty "--file FILE" argument.' >&2
            exit 1
            ;;
        -v|--verbose)
            verbose=$((verbose + 1)) # Each -v argument adds 1 to verbosity.
            ;;
        --) # End of all options.
            shift
            break
            ;;
        -?*)
            printf 'WARN: Unknown option (ignored): %s\n' "$1" >&2
            ;;
        *) # Default case: If no more options then break out of the loop.
            break
    esac

    shift
done

# Suppose --file is a required option. Check that it has been set.
if [ ! "$file" ]; then
    echo 'ERROR: option "--file FILE" not given. See --help.' >&2
    exit 1
fi

# Rest of the program here.
# If there are input files (for example) that follow the options, they
# will remain in the "$@" positional parameters.
Line 16: Line 72:
This parser does not handle separate options concatenated together (like `-xvf` being understood as `-x -v -f`). This could be added with effort, but this is left as an exercise for the reader.
Line 17: Line 74:
For more complex/generalized cases, or if you want things like "-xvf" to be handled as three separate flags, you can use getopts. ('''NEVER use getopt(1)!''')
 
Here is a simplistic getopts example:
=== getopts ===
Unless it's the version from util-linux, and you use its advanced mode, '''never use getopt(1).''' Traditional versions of `getopt` cannot handle empty argument strings, or arguments with embedded whitespace.
Line 21: Line 77:
{{{
    x=1 # Avoids an error if we get no options at all.
    while getopts "abcf:g:h:" opt; do
      case "$opt" in
        a) echo "You said a";;
        b) echo "You said b";;
        c) echo "You said c";;
        f) echo "You said f, with argument $OPTARG";;
        g) echo "You said g, with argument $OPTARG";;
        h) echo "You said h, with argument $OPTARG";;
      esac
      x=$OPTIND
    done
    shift $((x-1))
    echo "Left overs: $@"
The POSIX shell (and others) offer `getopts` which is safe to use instead. Here is a simplistic `getopts` example:

{{{#!highlight bash
#!/bin/sh

# Usage info
show_help() {
cat << EOF
Usage: ${0##*/} [-hv] [-f OUTFILE] [FILE]...
Do stuff with FILE and write the result to standard output. With no FILE
or when FILE is -, read standard input.

    -h display this help and exit
    -f OUTFILE write the result to OUTFILE instead of standard output.
    -v verbose mode. Can be used multiple times for increased
                verbosity.
EOF
}

# Initialize our own variables:
output_file=""
verbose=0

OPTIND=1 # Reset is necessary if getopts was used previously in the script. It is a good idea to make this local in a function.
while getopts "hvf:" opt; do
    case "$opt" in
        h)
            show_help
            exit 0
            ;;
        v) verbose=$((verbose+1))
            ;;
        f) output_file=$OPTARG
            ;;
        '?')
            show_help >&2
            exit 1
            ;;
    esac
done
shift "$((OPTIND-1))" # Shift off the options and optional --.

printf 'verbose=<%d>\noutput_file=<%s>\nLeftovers:\n' "$verbose" "$output_file"
printf '<%s>\n' "$@"

# End of file
Line 37: Line 124:
The advantages of `getopts` are:
Line 38: Line 126:
 1. It's portable, and will work in any POSIX shell e.g. dash.
 1. It can handle things like `-vf filename` in the expected Unix way, automatically.
 1. It understands `--` as the option terminator and more generally makes sure, options are parsed like for any standard command.
 1. With some implementations, the error messages will be localised in the language of the user.
Line 39: Line 131:
If your prefer to check options with IFs then: The disadvantage of `getopts` is that (except for ksh93 `getopts`) it can only handle short options (`-h`, not `--help`) without trickery and cannot handle options with optional arguments à la GNU.
Line 41: Line 133:
{{{
function HaveOpt {
  needle=$1
  shift
  while [[ $1 == -* ]]; do
    case "$1" in
      --) return 1; # stop now, since -- by convention is end of option arguments
      $needle) return 0;;
    esac
    shift
  done
  return 1;
}
}}}
There is a [[http://wiki.bash-hackers.org/howto/getopts_tutorial|getopts tutorial]] which explains what all of the syntax and variables mean. In bash, there is also `help getopts`, which might be informative.
Line 56: Line 135:
may be useful. Use it like:
{{{
HaveOpt --quick "$@" && echo "Option quick is set"
}}}
There is also still the disadvantage that options are coded in at least 2, probably 3 places - in the call to `getopts`, in the case statement that processes them and presumably in the help message that you are going to get around to writing one of these days. This is a classic opportunity for errors to creep in as the code is written and maintained - often not discovered till much, much later. This can be avoided by using callback functions, but this approach kind of defeats the purpose of using getopts at all.
Line 61: Line 137:
and it will work if script is run as:
 *YES: ./script --quick
 *YES: ./script -other --quick
but will stop on first no minus argument (or --)
 *NO: ./script -bar foo --quick
 *NO: ./script -bar -- --quick
For other, more complicated ways of option parsing, see ComplexOptionParsing.
Line 68: Line 139:
Of course, this approach (iterating over the argument list every time you want to check for one) is far less efficient than just iterating once and setting flag variables. ----
CategoryShell

How can I handle command-line arguments (options) to my script easily?

Well, that depends a great deal on what you want to do with them. There are several approaches, each with its strengths and weaknesses.

Manual loop

This approach handles any arbitrary set of options, because you're writing the parser yourself. For 90% of programs, this is the simplest approach (because you rarely need fancy stuff).

This example will handle a combination of short and long options. Notice how both "--file" and "--file=FILE" are handled.

   1 #!/bin/sh
   2 # (POSIX shell syntax)
   3 
   4 # Reset all variables that might be set
   5 file=
   6 verbose=0
   7 
   8 while [ "$#" -gt 0 ]; do
   9     case $1 in
  10         -h|-\?|--help)   # Call a "show_help" function to display a synopsis, then exit.
  11             show_help
  12             exit
  13             ;;
  14         -f|--file)       # Takes an option argument, ensuring it has been specified.
  15             if [ "$#" -gt 1 ]; then
  16                 file=$2
  17                 shift 2
  18                 continue
  19             else
  20                 echo 'ERROR: Must specify a non-empty "--file FILE" argument.' >&2
  21                 exit 1
  22             fi
  23             ;;
  24         --file=?*)
  25             file=${1#*=} # Delete everything up to "=" and assign the remainder.
  26             ;;
  27         --file=)         # Handle the case of an empty --file=
  28             echo 'ERROR: Must specify a non-empty "--file FILE" argument.' >&2
  29             exit 1
  30             ;;
  31         -v|--verbose)
  32             verbose=$((verbose + 1)) # Each -v argument adds 1 to verbosity.
  33             ;;
  34         --)              # End of all options.
  35             shift
  36             break
  37             ;;
  38         -?*)
  39             printf 'WARN: Unknown option (ignored): %s\n' "$1" >&2
  40             ;;
  41         *)               # Default case: If no more options then break out of the loop.
  42             break
  43     esac
  44 
  45     shift
  46 done
  47 
  48 # Suppose --file is a required option. Check that it has been set.
  49 if [ ! "$file" ]; then
  50     echo 'ERROR: option "--file FILE" not given. See --help.' >&2
  51     exit 1
  52 fi
  53 
  54 # Rest of the program here.
  55 # If there are input files (for example) that follow the options, they
  56 # will remain in the "$@" positional parameters.

This parser does not handle separate options concatenated together (like -xvf being understood as -x -v -f). This could be added with effort, but this is left as an exercise for the reader.

getopts

Unless it's the version from util-linux, and you use its advanced mode, never use getopt(1). Traditional versions of getopt cannot handle empty argument strings, or arguments with embedded whitespace.

The POSIX shell (and others) offer getopts which is safe to use instead. Here is a simplistic getopts example:

   1 #!/bin/sh
   2 
   3 # Usage info
   4 show_help() {
   5 cat << EOF
   6 Usage: ${0##*/} [-hv] [-f OUTFILE] [FILE]...
   7 Do stuff with FILE and write the result to standard output. With no FILE
   8 or when FILE is -, read standard input.
   9 
  10     -h          display this help and exit
  11     -f OUTFILE  write the result to OUTFILE instead of standard output.
  12     -v          verbose mode. Can be used multiple times for increased
  13                 verbosity.
  14 EOF
  15 }
  16 
  17 # Initialize our own variables:
  18 output_file=""
  19 verbose=0
  20 
  21 OPTIND=1 # Reset is necessary if getopts was used previously in the script.  It is a good idea to make this local in a function.
  22 while getopts "hvf:" opt; do
  23     case "$opt" in
  24         h)
  25             show_help
  26             exit 0
  27             ;;
  28         v)  verbose=$((verbose+1))
  29             ;;
  30         f)  output_file=$OPTARG
  31             ;;
  32         '?')
  33             show_help >&2
  34             exit 1
  35             ;;
  36     esac
  37 done
  38 shift "$((OPTIND-1))" # Shift off the options and optional --.
  39 
  40 printf 'verbose=<%d>\noutput_file=<%s>\nLeftovers:\n' "$verbose" "$output_file"
  41 printf '<%s>\n' "$@"
  42 
  43 # End of file

The advantages of getopts are:

  1. It's portable, and will work in any POSIX shell e.g. dash.
  2. It can handle things like -vf filename in the expected Unix way, automatically.

  3. It understands -- as the option terminator and more generally makes sure, options are parsed like for any standard command.

  4. With some implementations, the error messages will be localised in the language of the user.

The disadvantage of getopts is that (except for ksh93 getopts) it can only handle short options (-h, not --help) without trickery and cannot handle options with optional arguments à la GNU.

There is a getopts tutorial which explains what all of the syntax and variables mean. In bash, there is also help getopts, which might be informative.

There is also still the disadvantage that options are coded in at least 2, probably 3 places - in the call to getopts, in the case statement that processes them and presumably in the help message that you are going to get around to writing one of these days. This is a classic opportunity for errors to creep in as the code is written and maintained - often not discovered till much, much later. This can be avoided by using callback functions, but this approach kind of defeats the purpose of using getopts at all.

For other, more complicated ways of option parsing, see ComplexOptionParsing.


CategoryShell

BashFAQ/035 (last edited 2024-02-26 07:51:38 by larryv)