Differences between revisions 1 and 11 (spanning 10 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2007-05-02 23:19:34
Size: 3784
Editor: redondos
Comment:
Revision 11 as of 2008-11-22 14:09:00
Size: 3550
Editor: localhost
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Anchor(faq31)]] <<Anchor(faq31)>>
Line 11: Line 11:
    if [ -f "$filename" ]     if [ ! -f "$filename" ]
Line 20: Line 20:
    if [[ -e $file ]]     if [[ ! -e $file ]]
Line 31: Line 31:
To cut a long story short: {{{[}}} implements the old, portable syntax of the command. Although all modern shells have built-in implementations, there usually still is an external executable of that name, e.g. {{{/bin/[}}}. {{{[[}}} is a new improved version of it, which is a keyword, not a program. This has benefical effects on the ease of use, see below. {{{[[}}} is understood by KornShell, ["BASH"] (e.g. 2.03), KornShell93, ["POSIX"] shell, but not by the older BourneShell. To cut a long story short: {{{[}}} implements the old, portable syntax of the command. Although all modern shells have built-in implementations, there usually still is an external executable of that name, e.g. {{{/bin/[}}}. {{{[[}}} is a new improved version of it, which is a keyword, not a program. This has beneficial effects on the ease of use, as shown below. {{{[[}}} is understood by KornShell and [[BASH]] (e.g. 2.03), but not by the older POSIX or BourneShell.
Line 36: Line 36:
||<rowspan="4">string comparison||>||(not available)||-||
||<||(not available)||-||
||== (or =)||=||-||
||<rowspan=4>string comparison||>||\>||-||
||<||\<||-||
||= (or ==)||=||-||
Line 40: Line 40:
||<rowspan="2">expression grouping||&&||-a||{{{[[ -n $var && -f $var ]] && echo "$var is a file"}}}|| ||<rowspan=2>expression grouping||&&||-a||{{{[[ -n $var && -f $var ]] && echo "$var is a file"}}}||
Line 42: Line 42:
||Pattern matching||== (or =)||(not available)||{{{[[ $name = a* ]] || echo "name does not start with an 'a': $name"}}}||
||In-process regular expression matching||=~||(not available)||{{{[[ $(date) =~ ^Fri\ ...\ 13 ]] && echo "It's Friday the 13th!"}}}||
||Pattern matching||= (or ==)||(not available)||{{{[[ $name = a* ]] || echo "name does not start with an 'a': $name"}}}||
||RegularExpression matching||=~||(not available)||{{{[[ $(date) =~ ^Fri\ ...\ 13 ]] && echo "It's Friday the 13th!"}}}||
Line 54: Line 54:
 * No field splitting will be done for {{{[[}}} (and therefore many arguments need not to be quoted)  * No WordSplitting or [[glob]] expansion will be done for {{{[[}}} (and therefore many arguments need not be quoted):
Line 66: Line 66:
 This makes {{{[[}}} easier to use and less error prone.  This makes {{{[[}}} easier to use and less error-prone.
 * Parentheses in {{{[[}}} do not need to be escaped:
 {{{
 [[ -f $file1 && ( -d $dir1 || -d $dir2) ]]
 [ -f "$file1" -a \( -d "$dir1" -o -d "$dir2" \) ]}}}
Line 68: Line 72:
 * No file name generation will be done for {{{[[}}}. Therefore the following line tries to match the contents of the variable $path with the pattern {{{/*}}} As a rule of thumb, {{{[[}}} is used for strings and files. If you want to compare numbers, use an ArithmeticExpression, e.g.
Line 70: Line 74:
 {{{
 [[ $path = /* ]] && echo "\$path starts with a forward slash /: $path"}}}
{{{
# Bash
i=0
while ((i<10)); do ...
}}}
Line 73: Line 80:
 The next command most likely will result in an error, because {{{/*}}} is subject to file name generation: When should the new test command {{{[[}}} be used, and when the old one {{{[}}}? If portability to the BourneShell is a concern, the old syntax should be used. If on the other hand the script requires [[BASH]] or KornShell, the new syntax is much more flexible.
Line 75: Line 82:
 {{{
 [ $path = /* ] && echo "this does not work"}}}

 {{{[[}}} is strictly used for strings and files. If you want to compare numbers, use ArithmethicExpression ((''expression'')), e.g.

 {{{
 i=0
 while ((i<10))
 do
    echo $i
    ((i=$i+1))
 done}}}

When should the new test command {{{[[}}} be used, and when the old one {{{[}}}? If portability to the BourneShell is a concern, the old syntax should be used. If on the other hand the script requires ["BASH"] or KornShell, the new syntax could be preferable.
See the [[BashGuide/Practices/BashTests|Bash Tests]] chapter in the BashGuide.

What is the difference between the old and new test commands ([ and [[)?

[ ("test" command) and [[ ("new test" command) are both used to evaluate expressions. Some examples:

    if [ -z "$variable" ]
    then
        echo "variable is empty!"
    fi

    if [ ! -f "$filename" ]
    then
        echo "not a valid, existing file name: $filename"
    fi

and

    if [[ ! -e $file ]]
    then
        echo "directory entry does not exist: $file"
    fi

    if [[ $file0 -nt $file1 ]]
    then
        echo "file $file0 is newer than $file1"
    fi

To cut a long story short: [ implements the old, portable syntax of the command. Although all modern shells have built-in implementations, there usually still is an external executable of that name, e.g. /bin/[. [[ is a new improved version of it, which is a keyword, not a program. This has beneficial effects on the ease of use, as shown below. [[ is understood by KornShell and BASH (e.g. 2.03), but not by the older POSIX or BourneShell.

Although [ and [[ have much in common, and share many expression operators like "-f", "-s", "-n", "-z", there are some notable differences. Here is a comparison list:

Feature

new test [[

old test [

Example

string comparison

>

\>

-

<

\<

-

= (or ==)

=

-

!=

!=

-

expression grouping

&&

-a

[[ -n $var && -f $var ]] && echo "$var is a file"

||

-o

-

Pattern matching

= (or ==)

(not available)

[[ $name = a* ]] || echo "name does not start with an 'a': $name"

RegularExpression matching

=~

(not available)

[[ $(date) =~ ^Fri\ ...\ 13 ]] && echo "It's Friday the 13th!"

Special primitives that [[ is defined to have, but [ may be lacking (depending on the implementation):

Description

Primitive

Example

entry (file or directory) exists

-e

[[ -e $config ]] && echo "config file exists: $config"

file is newer/older than other file

-nt / -ot

[[ $file0 -nt $file1 ]] && echo "$file0 is newer than $file1"

two files are the same

-ef

[[ $input -ef $output ]] && { echo "will not overwrite input file: $input"; exit 1; } 

negation

!

-

But there are more subtle differences.

  • No WordSplitting or glob expansion will be done for [[ (and therefore many arguments need not be quoted):

     file="file name"
     [[ -f $file ]] && echo "$file is a file"

    will work even though $file is not quoted and contains whitespace. With [ the variable needs to be quoted:

     file="file name"
     [ -f "$file" ] && echo "$file is a file"

    This makes [[ easier to use and less error-prone.

  • Parentheses in [[ do not need to be escaped:

     [[ -f $file1 && ( -d $dir1 || -d $dir2) ]]
     [ -f "$file1" -a \( -d "$dir1" -o -d "$dir2" \) ]

As a rule of thumb, [[ is used for strings and files. If you want to compare numbers, use an ArithmeticExpression, e.g.

# Bash
i=0
while ((i<10)); do ...

When should the new test command [[ be used, and when the old one [? If portability to the BourneShell is a concern, the old syntax should be used. If on the other hand the script requires BASH or KornShell, the new syntax is much more flexible.

See the Bash Tests chapter in the BashGuide.

BashFAQ/031 (last edited 2022-05-09 13:49:40 by 27)