Diff for "BashFAQ/020"

How can I find and safely handle file names containing newlines, spaces or both?

First and foremost, to understand why you're having trouble, read Arguments to get a grasp on how the shell understands the statements you give it. It is vital that you grasp this matter well if you're going to be doing anything with the shell.

The preferred method to deal with arbitrary filenames is still to use find(1):

find ... -exec command {} \;

or, if you need to handle filenames en masse:

find ... -exec command {} +

xargs is rarely ever more useful than the above, but if you really insist, remember to use -0 (-0 is not in the POSIX standard, but is implemented by GNU and BSD systems):

# Requires GNU/BSD find and xargs
find ... -print0 | xargs -r0 command

# Never use xargs without -0 or similar extensions!

Use one of these unless you really can't.

Another way to deal with files with spaces in their names is to use the shell's filename expansion (globbing). This has the disadvantage of not working recursively (except with zsh's extensions or bash 4's globstar), and it normally does not include hidden files (filenames beginning with "."). But if you just need to process all the files in a single directory, and omitting hidden files is okay, it works fantastically well.

For example, this code renames all the *.mp3 files in the current directory to use underscores in their names instead of spaces (this uses the bash/ksh extension allowing "/" in parameter expansion):

# Bash/ksh
for file in ./*\ *.mp3; do
  if [ -e "$file" ] ; then  # Make sure it isn't an empty match
    mv "$file" "${file// /_}"
  fi
done

You can omit the "if..." and "fi" lines if you're certain that at least one path will match the glob. The problem is that if the glob doesn't match, instead of looping 0 times (as you might expect), the loop will execute once with the unexpanded pattern (which is usually not what you want). You can also use the bash extension "shopt -s nullglob" to make empty globs expand to nothing, and then again you can omit the if and fi.

For more examples of renaming files, see FAQ #30.

Remember, you need to quote all your Parameter Expansions using double quotes. If you don't, the expansion will undergo WordSplitting (see also argument splitting and BashPitfalls). Also, always prefix globs with "/" or "./"; otherwise, if there's a file with "-" as the first character, the expansions might be misinterpreted as options.

Another way to handle filenames recursively involves using the -print0 option of find (a GNU/BSD extension), together with bash's -d extended option for read:

# Bash
unset a i
while IFS= read -r -d $'\0' file; do
  a[i++]="$file"        # or however you want to process each file
done < <(find /tmp -type f -print0)

The preceding example reads all the files under /tmp (recursively) into an array, even if they have newlines or other whitespace in their names, by forcing read to use the NUL byte (\0) as its line delimiter. Since NUL is not a valid byte in Unix filenames, this is the safest approach besides using find -exec. IFS= is required to avoid trimming leading/trailing whitespace, and -r is needed to avoid backslash processing. In fact, $'\0' is actually the empty string (bash doesn't support passing NUL bytes to commands even built-in ones) so we could also write it like this:

# Bash
unset a i
while IFS= read -r -d '' file; do
  a[i++]="$file"
done < <(find /tmp -type f -print0)

So, why doesn't this work?

# DOES NOT WORK
unset a i
find /tmp -type f -print0 | while IFS= read -r -d '' file; do
  a[i++]="$file"
done

Because of the pipeline, the entire while loop is executed in a SubShell and therefore the array assignments will be lost after the loop terminates. (For more details about this, see FAQ #24.)

For a longer discussion about handling filenames in shell, see Filenames and Pathnames in Shell: How to do it Correctly.

CategoryShell