Differences between revisions 13 and 14
Revision 13 as of 2009-03-19 14:48:29
Size: 2139
Editor: pgas
Comment: add d
Revision 14 as of 2009-05-06 19:34:30
Size: 2149
Editor: GreyCat
Comment: add the word "hierarchy" to the question so I can find it
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 2: Line 2:
== How can I recreate a directory structure, without the files? == == How can I recreate a directory hierarchy structure, without the files? ==

How can I recreate a directory hierarchy structure, without the files?

With the cpio program:

 cd "$srcdir"
 find . -type d -print | cpio -pdumv "$dstdir"

or with the pax program:

 find . -type d -print | pax -rwdv  "$dstdir"

or with GNU tar, and more verbose syntax:

 cd "$srcdir"
 find . -type d -print | tar c --files-from - --no-recursion |
   tar x --directory "$dstdir"

This creates a list of directory names with find, non-recursively adds just the directories to an archive, and pipes it to a second tar instance to extract it at the target location. As you can see, tar is the least suited to this task, but people just adore it, so it has to be included here to appease the tar fanboy crowd. (Note: you can't even do this at all with a typical Unix tar. Also note: there is no such thing as "standard tar", as both tar and cpio were intentionally omitted from POSIX in favor of pax.)

All three of the solutions above will fail if directory names contain newline characters. On many modern BSD/GNU systems, at least the first two can be trivially modified to cope with that, by using find -print0 and either pax -0 or cpio -0.

If you want to create stub files instead of full-sized files, with GNU find(1), the following is likely to be the simplest solution. The find command recreates the regular files using "dummy" files (empty files with the same timestamps):

 cd "$srcdir"
 # insert pax/cpio command here, to make the directories
 find . -type f -exec touch -r {} "$destination"/{} \;

Be aware, though, that according to POSIX, the behaviour of find is unspecified when {} is not standing alone in an argument. Because of this, the following solution is more portable (and probably faster...) than the previous:

 dstdir=whatever; export dstdir
 find . -type f -exec sh -c 'for i; do touch -r "$i" "$dstdir"/"$i"; done' _ {} +

If your find can't handle -exec + then you can use \; instead of + at the end of the command. See UsingFind for explanations.

BashFAQ/010 (last edited 2023-09-22 06:29:48 by StephaneChazelas)