[Show "Revision History"] [Show "General Page Infos"] [Show "Page hits and edits"]

Revision History

Showing page edit history entries from 11 to 35 out of 50 entries total. (5 | 10 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 200 items per page)

Newer 50 35 25 Older
# Date Size Editor Comment Action
35 2012-01-13 09:37:49 5260 to previous ght mention failglob view
34 2011-12-13 13:42:53 5215 to previous GreyCat Wow... very much cleanup. view
33 2011-12-13 10:17:36 4981 to previous Lhunath simpler. view
32 2011-12-13 10:17:00 4441 to previous Lhunath simpler. view
31 2011-11-06 09:37:01 4114 to previous ormaaj Other shells view
30 2011-05-26 13:17:47 3781 to previous sbl-eh4-rp1   view
29 2011-03-22 16:49:02 3635 to previous GreyCat counting too view
28 2011-03-21 13:20:36 3173 to previous passionsfrucht   view
27 2011-03-17 15:17:02 3175 to previous 84-73-54-61   view
26 2009-12-29 17:17:00 3179 to previous MatthiasPopp   view
25 2009-12-15 20:21:14 3156 to previous GreyCat pointer to 097 (dangling symlink) view
24 2009-12-11 14:06:05 3140 to previous GreyCat clean up, quite a bit view
23 2009-07-20 18:09:15 2700 to previous localhost   view
22 2009-07-10 14:06:56 2692 to previous NeilMoore make second example have the same polarity as the first view
21 2009-05-11 21:38:33 2700 to previous Lhunath   view
20 2009-05-05 19:25:06 2262 to previous localhost   view
19 2008-11-22 20:57:36 2250 to previous GreyCat new first-line standard view
18 2008-11-22 14:08:36 2232 to previous localhost converted to 1.6 markup view
17 2008-10-14 19:58:58 2230 to previous GreyCat Bourne: test ! is ok but ! command is not. view
16 2008-10-11 23:15:10 2230 to previous GreyCat Revert to revision 14. view
15 2008-10-11 21:57:53 2231 to previous gw backticks to $() view
14 2008-10-06 03:19:49 2230 to previous GreyCat No, Bourne shell doesn't have $(). Or [. view
13 2008-10-06 00:45:44 2343 to previous gw backticks to $() view
12 2008-09-27 16:02:36 2342 to previous 82-71-12-170 I forgot about dot files. The portable solution is now even uglier, and relies on .* expanding to exactly . .. in empty dirs... will it? Maybe add other solutions with warnings view
11 2008-09-27 02:38:15 2217 to previous 82-71-12-170 put bash solutions at top, removed bash-specific non-array solution (what's wrong with arrays?), removed ls -A solutions (if you want to not use a specific shell you may as well TRY to be portable) view
Newer 50 35 25 Older