3140
Comment: clean up, quite a bit
|
3175
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 2: | Line 2: |
Line 12: | Line 13: |
Or you can pour it into a SubShell to avoid having to unset (in fact, reset! - the code above assumes the shell options were unset before) the shell options again: |
Or you can pour it into a SubShell to avoid having to reset (in fact, unset! - the code above assumes the shell options were unset before) the shell options again: |
Line 21: | Line 21: |
Line 36: | Line 35: |
(The `-L` test is required because `-e` fails if the first file is a dangling symlink.) | (The `-L` test is required because `-e` fails if the first file is a [[BashFAQ/097|dangling symlink]].) |
Line 46: | Line 45: |
Line 57: | Line 55: |
Most commonly, all that's really needed is something like this: | |
Line 58: | Line 57: |
Most commonly, all that's really needed is something like this: | |
Line 67: | Line 65: |
---- CategoryShell |
How can I check whether a directory is empty or not? How do I check for any *.mpg files?
In Bash, you can do this safely and easily with the nullglob and dotglob options (which change the behaviour of globbing), and arrays:
# Bash shopt -s nullglob dotglob files=(*) (( ${#files[*]} )) || echo directory is empty shopt -u nullglob dotglob
Or you can pour it into a SubShell to avoid having to reset (in fact, unset! - the code above assumes the shell options were unset before) the shell options again:
# Bash if (shopt -s nullglob dotglob; f=(*); ((! ${#f[@]}))); then echo "The current directory is empty." fi
Of course, you can use any glob you like instead of *. E.g. *.mpg or /my/music/*.mpg works fine.
Some people dislike nullglob because having unmatched globs vanish altogether confuses programs like ls. Mistyping ls *.zip as ls *.zpi may cause every file to be displayed. Setting nullglob in a SubShell avoids accidentally changing its setting in the rest of the shell, at the price of an extra fork().
If your script needs to run with various non-Bash shell implementations, you can try using an external program like python, perl, or find; or you can try one of these:
# POSIX # Clobbers the positional parameters, so make sure you don't need them. set -- * if test -e "$1" || test -L "$1"; then echo "directory is non-empty" fi
(The -L test is required because -e fails if the first file is a dangling symlink.)
# Bourne # (Of course, the system must have printf(1).) if test "`printf '%s %s %s' .* *`" = '. .. *' && test ! -f '*' then echo "directory is empty" fi
Yes, they're quite ugly, but they should be more portable than anything depending on ls output. Even ls -A solutions can break (e.g. on HP-UX, if you are root, ls -A does the exact opposite of what it does if you're not root -- and no, I can't make up something that incredibly stupid).
In fact, you may wish to avoid the direct question altogether. Usually people want to know whether a directory is empty because they want to do something involving the files therein, etc. Look to the larger question. For example, one of these find-based examples may be an appropriate solution:
# Bourne find "$somedir" -type f -exec echo Found unexpected file {} \; find "$somedir" -maxdepth 0 -empty -exec echo {} is empty. \; # GNU/BSD find "$somedir" -type d -empty -exec cp /my/configfile {} \; # GNU/BSD
Most commonly, all that's really needed is something like this:
# Bourne for f in ./*.mpg; do test -f "$f" || continue mympgviewer "$f" done
In other words, the person asking the question may have thought an explicit empty-directory test was needed to avoid an error message like mympgviewer: ./*.mpg: No such file or directory when in fact no such test is required.