Differences between revisions 46 and 71 (spanning 25 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 46 as of 2007-05-28 16:17:32 →
Size: 96256
Editor: Lhunath
Comment: case and select
← Revision 71 as of 2007-06-28 20:17:57 → ⇥
Size: 121768
Editor: Lhunath
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 9: Line 9:
----
Line 15: Line 16:
[[Anchor(about)]] [[Anchor(About)]]
Line 24: Line 25:
--------



[[Anchor(definition)]]		 The maintainer(s) of this document:
  * -- ["Lhunath"]

--------



[[Anchor(Definition)]]
Line 46: Line 50:
[[Anchor(using)]] [[Anchor(Using_Bash)]]
Line 64: Line 68:
[[Anchor(scripts)]] [[Anchor(Scripts)]]
Line 143: Line 147:
[[Anchor(basics)]] [[Anchor(Basics)]]
Line 148: Line 152:
[[Anchor(commands)]] [[Anchor(Commands_Arguments)]]
Line 202: Line 206:
[[Anchor(splitting)]] [[Anchor(Argument_Splitting)]]
Line 283: Line 287:
[[Anchor(characters)]] [[Anchor(Special_Characters)]]
Line 332: Line 336:
[[Anchor(parameters)]] [[Anchor(Parameters)]]
Line 435: Line 439:
[[Anchor(Variables)]]
Line 495: Line 500:
[[Anchor(Parameter_Expansion)]]
Line 598: Line 604:
[[Anchor(patterns)]] [[Anchor(Patterns)]]
Line 611: Line 617:
[[Anchor(Globs)]]
Line 713: Line 720:
[[Anchor(Regex)]]
Line 757: Line 765:
[[Anchor(conditionals)]] [[Anchor(Conditionals)]]
Line 764: Line 772:
[[Anchor(exitcode)]] [[Anchor(Exit_Status)]]
Line 771: Line 779:
'''From the `ping` manual:
    If ping does not receive any reply packets at all it will exit with code 1.		 '''From the `ping` manual:'''
    '''If ping does not receive any reply packets at all it will exit with code 1.
Line 813: Line 821:
[[Anchor(operators)]] [[Anchor(Control_Operators)]]
Line 881: Line 889:
[[Anchor(Conditionals)]]
Line 907: Line 916:
`if` executes the command `[` with the arguments 'a', '=', 'b' and ']'. `[` uses these arguments to determine what must be checked. It then checks whether the string 'a' is identical to the string 'b', and if this is the case, it will exit successfully. However, since we know this is not the case, `[` will not exit successfully (it's exit code will be 1). `if` sees that `[` terminated unsuccessfully and executes the code in the `else` block. `if` executes the command `[` with the arguments '`a`', '`=`', '`b`' and '`]`'. `[` uses these arguments to determine what must be checked. It then checks whether the string 'a' is identical to the string 'b', and if this is the case, it will exit successfully. However, since we know this is not the case, `[` will not exit successfully (it's exit code will be 1). `if` sees that `[` terminated unsuccessfully and executes the code in the `else` block.
Line 921: Line 930:
`[` was executed with the arguments 'my', 'dad', '=', 'my', 'dog' and ']'. `[` doesn't understand what test it's supposed to execute, because it expects the second argument to be the operator. In our case, the operator is the third argument. Yet another reason why '''quotes''' are so terribly important. Whenever we type whitespace in bash that belongs together with the words before or after it, '''we need to quote the whole string''': `[` was executed with the arguments '`my`', '`dad`', '`=`', '`my`', '`dog`' and '`]`'. `[` doesn't understand what test it's supposed to execute, because it expects the second argument to be the operator. In our case, the operator is the third argument. Yet another reason why '''quotes''' are so terribly important. Whenever we type whitespace in bash that belongs together with the words before or after it, '''we need to quote the whole string''':
Line 966: Line 975:
This time, $dad and $dog didn't need to be quoted. Since `[[` isn't an application (while `[` is), but a built-in, it has special magical powers. It parses its arguments before they are expanded by bash and does the expansion itself; taking the result as a single argument, even if that result contains whitespace. ''However'', be aware that simple strings still have to be quoted properly. `[[` can't know whether your literal whitespace in the statement is intentional or not; so it splits it up just like ["BASH"] normally would. Let's fix our last example: This time, `$dad` and `$dog` did not need quotes. Since `[[` isn't an application (while `[` is), but a built-in, it has special magical powers. It parses its arguments before they are expanded by bash and does the expansion itself; taking the result as a single argument, even if that result contains whitespace. ''However'', be aware that simple strings still have to be quoted properly. `[[` can't know whether your literal whitespace in the statement is intentional or not; so it splits it up just like ["BASH"] normally would. Let's fix our last example:
Line 1052: Line 1061:
    [http://wooledge.org/mywiki/BashFAQ/054 How can I tell whether a variable contains a valid number?]     [http://wooledge.org/mywiki/BashFAQ/054 How can I tell whether a variable contains a valid number?]'''
Line 1058: Line 1067:
[[Anchor(Loops)]]
Line 1272: Line 1282:
[[Anchor(Choices)]]
Line 1339: Line 1350:
    [[BR]]
Line 1345: Line 1357:
[[Anchor(io)]] [[Anchor(IO)]]
Line 1352: Line 1364:
[[Anchor(fds)]] [[Anchor(FDs)]]
Line 1393: Line 1405:
[[Anchor(redirection)]] [[Anchor(Redirection)]]
Line 1407: Line 1419:
[[Anchor(File_Redirection)]]
Line 1518: Line 1531:
[[Anchor(FD_Manipulation)]]
Line 1520: Line 1534:
Now that you know how to manipulate process input and output by sending it to and reading it from files; let's make this a little more interesting still.

It's possible to change the source and desination of FDs to point to or from files, that you know. It's also possible to copy one FD to another. Let's prepare a simple testbed:		 Now that you know how to manipulate process input and output by sending it to and reading it from files, let's make it a little more interesting still.

It's possible to change the source and desination of FDs to point to or from files, as you know. It's also possible to copy one FD to another. Let's prepare a simple testbed:
Line 1537: Line 1551:
In this silly example we have a directory called house with several pieces of furniture in it as files. If we're looking for our `socks` in each of those files, we send grep to search the directory `house/`. `grep` will search everything in there, open each file and look through its contents. In our example, grep finds `socks` in the file `house/sofa`; presumably tucked away under a pillow. You want a more realistic example? Sure: In this silly example we have a directory called `house` with several pieces of furniture in it as files. If we're looking for our `socks` in each of those files, we send `grep` to search the directory `house/`. `grep` will search everything in there, open each file and look through its contents. In our example, `grep` finds `socks` in the file `house/sofa`; presumably tucked away under a pillow. You want a more realistic example? Sure:
Line 1553: Line 1567:
Good, `grep` found our sentence in `file`. It writes the result of its operation to `stdout` which is shown on our terminal. Now let's see if we can make grep send an error message, too: Good! `grep` found our sentence in `file`. It writes the result of its operation to `stdout` which is shown on our terminal. Now let's see if we can make `grep` send an error message, too:
Line 1571: Line 1585:
We need to prevent having two FDs working on the same destination or source. We can do this by dublicating FDs: We need to prevent having two FDs working on the same destination or source. We can do this by duplicating FDs:
Line 1577: Line 1591:
You need to remember to always read file redirections from right to left. This is the order in which ["BASH"] assigns and processes them. First, `stdout` is changed so that it points to our `proud.log`. Then, we use the `>&` syntax to dublicate FD 1 and put this dublicate in FD 2's stead. If this is hard for you to grasp, you could read this as: `stdout becomes proud.log and stderr becomes stdout (which is proud.log)`. As a result, `stdout` obviously writes its information to `proud.log`, but `stderr` writes its information to whatever `stdout` was when the `>&` redirector was used; which was `proud.log` as well. In this case, the handle that writes to `proud.log` is the same for both `stdout` and `stderr`, and no collisions occur. You need to remember to always read file redirections from left to right. This is the order in which ["BASH"] assigns and processes them. First, `stdout` is changed so that it points to our `proud.log`. Then, we use the `>&` syntax to duplicate FD 1 and put this duplicate in FD 2's stead. If this is hard for you to grasp, you could read this as: `stdout` becomes `proud.log` and `stderr` becomes `stdout` (which is `proud.log`). As a result, `stdout` obviously writes its information to `proud.log`, but `stderr` writes its information to whatever `stdout` was when the `>&` redirector was used; which was `proud.log` as well. In this case, the handle that writes to `proud.log` is the same for both `stdout` and `stderr`, and no collisions occur.
Line 1585: Line 1599:
This would read as `stderr becomes stdout (which is the terminal) and stdout becomes proud.log`. As a result, `stdout`'s messages will be logged, but the error messages will still go to the terminal. ''Oops''. This would read as `stderr` becomes `stdout` (which is the terminal), and then `stdout` becomes `proud.log`. As a result, `stdout`'s messages will be logged, but the error messages will still go to the terminal. ''Oops''.
Line 1595: Line 1609:
This is the same as `> proud.log 2>&1`, just a bit shorter. You pick. This is the same as `> proud.log 2>&1`, but not portable to BourneShell. It is not recommended practice.
Line 1618: Line 1632:
[[Anchor(Heredocs_Herestrings)]]
Line 1620: Line 1635:
Files aren't all that. They're boring, really. Strings are so much more interesting. They're not permanent like files on a hard disk, but they're easy to work with, easy to make an easy to manipulate. Files aren't all that. They're boring, really. Strings are so much more interesting. They're not permanent like files on a hard disk, but they're easy to work with, easy to make and easy to manipulate.
Line 1631: Line 1646:
This is a ''Heredoc''. ''Heredocs'' aren't really useful unless if you're trying to embody long strings of several lines inside your scripts; which is '''very bad practice'''. The way they work, is by adding the `<<STRING` operator at the end of a command. That'll tell that command's `stdin` that it has to start reading input from the script (or the command line, if you're not in a script). The input of the ''Heredoc'' stops as soon as you repeat whatever string you used to add to the end of the `<<`. In the example above, I used the string `END`; but it can really be anything (so long as you quote it if it has whitespace).

Let's check out the very similar but more interesting ''Herestrings'':		 This is a ''Heredoc'' (or ''Here Document''). ''Heredoc''s aren't really useful unless you're trying to embed long strings of several lines inside your scripts, which is bad practice. You should keep your logic (your code) and your input (your data) separated, preferably in different files.

The way ''Heredoc''s work, is by adding the `<<STRING` operator at the end of a command. That'll instruct that command's `stdin` that it has to start reading from the script (or the command line, if you're not in a script). The input of the ''Heredoc'' stops as soon as you repeat whatever string you added to the end of the `<<`. In the example above, I used the string `END`; but it can really be anything (so long as you quote it if it has whitespace).

Beware that all text following the ''Heredoc'' operator is sent to the command's `stdin` literally. That also means any spaces you use for indenting your script. The terminator string (in our case `END`) must be in the beginning of the line.

{{{
    echo "Let's test abc:"
    if [[ abc = a* ]]; then
        echo <<END
            abc seems to start with an a!
    END
    fi
}}}

Will result in:

{{{
    Let's test abc:
            abc seems to start with an a!
}}}

You can avoid this by temporarily removing the indentation for the lines of your ''Heredoc''s. However, that distorts your pretty and consistent indendation. There is an alternative. If you use `<<-END` instead of `<<END` as your ''Heredoc'' operator, ["BASH"] removes any `tab` characters in the beginning of each line of your ''Heredoc'' content before sending it to the command. That way you can still use tabs to indent your ''Heredoc'' content with the rest of your code. Those tabs will not be sent to the command that receives your ''Heredoc''. This also means you can use tabs to indent your terminator string.

Let's check out the very similar but more interesting ''Herestring''s:
Line 1647: Line 1684:
''Herestring''s are shorter, less intrusive and overall more convenient than their bulky ''Heredoc'' counterpart.

Later on, you will learn about pipes and how they can be used to send the output of a command into another command's `stdin`. Many people use pipes to send the output of a variable as `stdin` into a command. However, for this purpose, ''Herestring''s should be preferred. They do not create a subshell and are lighter both to the shell and to the style of your shell script:

{{{
    $ echo 'Wrap this silly sentence.' | fmt -t -w 20
    Wrap this silly
       sentence.
    $ fmt -t -w 20 <<< 'Wrap this silly sentence.'
    Wrap this silly
       sentence.
}}}
Line 1650: Line 1700:
    Heredocs are usually a bad idea because scripts should contain logic, not data.
    If you have a document that your script needs; you should ship it in a separate
    file along with your script. Herestrings, however, come in handy quite often;		     Long heredocs are usually a bad idea because scripts should contain logic, not data.
    If you have a large document that your script needs, you should ship it in a separate
    file along with your script. Herestrings, however, come in handy quite often,
Line 1660: Line 1710:


[[Anchor(Pipes)]]
=== Pipes ===

Now that you can effortlessly manipulate ''File Descriptors'' to direct certain types of output to certain files, it's time you learn some more ingenious tricks available through I/O redirection.

You can use ''File Redirection'' to write output to files or read input from files. But what if you want to connect the output of one application directly to the input of another? That way, you could build a sort of chain to process output. If you already know about `FIFO`s, you could use something like this to that end:

{{{
    $ ls
    $ mkfifo myfifo; ls
    myfifo
    $ grep bea myfifo &
    [1] 32635
    $ echo "rat
    > cow
    > deer
    > bear
    > snake" > myfifo
    bear
}}}

We use the `mkfifo` command to create a new file in the current directory named '`myfifo`'. This is no ordinary file, however, but a `FIFO`. `FIFO`s are files that serve data on a `First In, First Out`-basis. When you read from a `FIFO`, you will only receive data as soon as another process writes to it. As such, a `FIFO` never really contains any data. So long as no process writes data to a file that can be read, any read operation on the `FIFO` will '''block''' as it waits for data to become available. The same works for writes to the file. They will block until another process reads from the `FIFO`.

In our example, the `FIFO` called `myfifo` is read from by `grep`. `grep` waits for data to become available on the `FIFO`. That's why we append the grep command with the `&` operator, which puts it in the background. That way, we can continue typing and executing commands while `grep` runs and waits for data. Our `echo` statement feeds data to the `FIFO`. As soon as this data becomes available, the running `grep` command reads it in and processes it. The result is displayed. We have successfully sent data from the `echo` command to the `grep` command.

But these temporary files are a real annoyance. You may not have write permissions. You need to remember to clean up any temporary files you create. You need to make sure that data is going in and out, or the `FIFO` might just end up blocking for no reason.

For these reasons, another feature is made available. This feature is called `Pipes`. It basically just connects the `stdout` of one process to the `stdin` of another; effectively ''piping'' the data from one process into another. Let's try our above example again, but using pipes:

{{{
    $ echo "rat
    > cow
    > deer
    > bear
    > snake" | grep bea myfifo
    bear
}}}

The pipe is created using the `|` operator inbetween two commands that are connected with the pipe. The former command's `stdout` is connected to the latter command's `stdin`. As a result, `grep` can read `echo`'s output and display the result of it's operation, which is `bear`.

Pipes are widely used as a means of postprocessing application output. `FIFO`s are, in fact, also referred to as `named pipes`. They accomplish the same results as the pipe operator, but through a filename.

'''Note:
[[BR]]
The pipe operator creates a subshell environment to run the second process in. This is important to know because any variables that you modify or initialize inside the second command will appear unmodified outside of it. Let's illustrate:'''

{{{
    $ message=Test
    $ echo "Salut, le monde!" | { read message; echo "The message is: $message"; }
    The message is: Salut, le monde!
    $ echo "The message is: $message"
    The message is: Test
}}}

Once the piped command ends, so does the subshell that was created for it. Along with that subshell, any modifications made in that subshell are lost. So be careful!


--------
    '''Good Practice:
    [[BR]]
    Pipes are a very attractive means of post-processing application output. You should,
    however, be careful not to over-use pipes. If you end up making a pipe-chain that
    consists of three or more applications, it is time to ask yourself whether you're doing
    things a smart way. You might be able to use more application features of one of the
    post-processing applications you've used earlier in the pipe. Each new element in a
    pipe chain causes a new subshell and a new application to be loaded. It also makes it
    very hard to follow the logic in your script!'''
----
    '''In The Manual:
    [http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bashref.html#SEC17 Pipelines]'''
----
    '''In the FAQ:
    [[BR]]
    [http://wooledge.org/mywiki/BashFAQ/024 I set variables in a loop. Why do they suddenly disappear after the loop terminates? Or, why can't I pipe data to read?]
    [[BR]]
    [http://wooledge.org/mywiki/BashFAQ/027 How can two processes communicate using named pipes (fifos)?]
    [[BR]]
    [http://wooledge.org/mywiki/BashFAQ/047 How can I redirect stderr to a pipe?]
    [[BR]]
    [http://wooledge.org/mywiki/BashFAQ/001 How can I read a file line-by-line?]
    [[BR]]
    [http://wooledge.org/mywiki/BashFAQ/055 Tell me all about 2>&1 -- what's the difference between 2>&1 >foo and >foo 2>&1, and when do I use which?]'''
--------


[[Anchor(Miscellaneous_Operators)]]
=== Miscellaneous Operators (stub) ===

[[Anchor(Structural_Constructs)]]
== Structural Constructs (stub) ==

[[Anchor(Compound_Commands)]]
=== Compound Commands (stub) ===

[[Anchor(Subshells)]]
=== Subshells (stub) ===

[[Anchor(Functions_Aliasses)]]
=== Functions and Aliasses (stub) ===

[[Anchor(Sourcing)]]
=== Sourcing (stub) ===

[[Anchor(Practices)]]
= Practices =

[[Anchor(Choose_Your_Shell)]]
== Choose Your Shell ==

The first thing you should do before starting a shell script is enumerate the requirements and the goal of that script.

Pick the right tool for the job. ["BASH"] may be easy to learn and write, but it isn't always fitted to do the work for you.

There are a lot of tools in the basic toolset made available in most *NIX flavors that can help you. If you need only use AWK, then don't make a ["BASH"] script that invokes AWK, just make an AWK script. If you need to retrieve data from an HTML or XML file, ["BASH"] is also '''the wrong tool for the job'''. You should considder XSLT instead, or a language that has a library available for parsing XML or HTML.

If you decide to use ["BASH"], then ask yourself these questions first:
  * Does your script need to run in environments where it's possible ["BASH"] is not available?
    '''Then choose Sh instead!''' ''(Keep in mind that this guide does not apply to Sh!)''
  * Are you certain about the version of ["BASH"] that will be available in all environments that your script will run in?
    '''If not, you should limit yourself to features of ["BASH"] 2 ONLY.'''

If the above questions do not limit your choices, '''then use ["BASH"] 3'''. Keep these points in mind:
  * '''Do not inherit ugly and evil shell scripting techniques from retarded Sh scripting guides and examples on the net; ["BASH"] 3 often offers far better alternatives!'''
  * Do not use a `#!/bin/sh` header in your script. Be honest and use `#!/bin/bash` instead. Otherwise you disable all ["BASH"] specific features that are not available in Sh.
  * Forget `[` for once and for all. ["BASH"] features an alternative that's '''far''' better for many of reasons. It's called `[[`. Using `[` will only cause headaches and break your script when you least expect it.
  * It's also time you forgot about {{{`}}}. It isn't consistent with the syntax of ''Expansion'' and is terribly hard to nest without a dose of painkillers. Use `$()` instead.
  * ''And for heaven's sake, '''quotes, quotes, quotes and more quotes'''!'' Protect your strings from ''Word Splitting''. ''Word splitting'' will eat your babies if you don't quote them properly.


--------


[[Anchor(Quoting)]]
== Quoting ==

''Word Splitting'' is the demon inside ["BASH"] that is out to get unsuspecting newcomers or any other scripters off guard.

If you do not understand how ''Word Splitting'' works or when it is aplied you should be very careful with your strings and your ''Parameter Expansion''s. I suggest you read up on ''Word Splitting'' if you doubt your knowledge.

The best way to protect yourself from this beast is to quote all your strings. Quotes keep your strings in one piece and prevent ''Word Splitting'' from tearing them open. Allow me to illustrate:

{{{
    $ echo Push that word away from me.
    Push that word away from me.
    $ echo "Push that word away from me."
    Push that word away from me.
}}}

Now, don't think ''Word Splitting'' is about collapsing spaces. What really happened in this example is that the first command passed each word in our sentence as a separate argument to `echo`. ["BASH"] split our sentence up in words using the whitespace inbetween them to determine where each argument begins and ends. In the second example ["BASH"] is forced to keep the whole quoted string together. This means it's not split up into arguments and the whole string is passed to `echo` '''as the first argument'''. `echo` prints out each argument it gets with a space inbetween them. You should understand the basics of ''Word Splitting'' now.

This is where it gets dangerous! ''Word Splitting'' does not just happen on literal strings, it also happens '''after ''Parameter Expansion'''''! As a result, on a dull and tired day, you might just be stupid enough to make this mistake:

{{{
    $ sentence="Push that word away from me."
    $ echo $sentence
    Push that word away from me.
    $ echo "$sentence"
    Push that word away from me.
}}}

As you can see, in the first `echo` command, we were neglectant and left out the quotes. That was a mistake. ["BASH"] expanded our sentence and then used ''Word Splitting'' to split the resulting expansion up into arguments to use for `echo`. In our second example, the quotes around the ''Parameter Expansion'' of `sentence` make sure ["BASH"] '''does not''' split it up into multiple arguments around the whitespace.

It's not just spaces you need to protect. ''Word Splitting'' occurs on spaces, tabs and newlines. In certain context it aplies to the characters in the `IFS` variable. Here's another example to show you just how badly you can break things if you neglect to use quotes:

{{{
    $ echo "$(ls -al)"
    total 8
    drwxr-xr-x 4 lhunath users 1 2007-06-28 13:13 "."/
    drwxr-xr-x 102 lhunath users 9 2007-06-28 13:13 ".."/
    -rw-r--r-- 1 lhunath users 0 2007-06-28 13:13 "a"
    -rw-r--r-- 1 lhunath users 0 2007-06-28 13:13 "b"
    -rw-r--r-- 1 lhunath users 0 2007-06-28 13:13 "c"
    drwxr-xr-x 2 lhunath users 1 2007-06-28 13:13 "d"/
    drwxr-xr-x 2 lhunath users 1 2007-06-28 13:13 "e"/
    $ echo $(ls -al)
    total 8 drwxr-xr-x 4 lhunath users 1 2007-06-28 13:13 "."/ drwxr-xr-x 102 lhunath users 9 2007-06-28 13:13 ".."/ -rw-r--r-- 1 lhunath users 0 2007-06-28 13:13 "a" -rw-r--r-- 1 lhunath users 0 2007-06-28 13:13 "b" -rw-r--r-- 1 lhunath users 0 2007-06-28 13:13 "c" drwxr-xr-x 2 lhunath users 1 2007-06-28 13:13 "d"/ drwxr-xr-x 2 lhunath users 1 2007-06-28 13:13 "e"/
}}}

In some very rare occasions it may be desired to leave out the quotes. That's if you '''need''' ''Word Splitting'' to take place:

{{{
    $ friends="Marcus JJ Thomas Michelangelo"
    $ for friend in $friends
    > do echo "$friend is my friend!"; done
    Marcus is my friend!
    JJ is my friend!
    Thomas is my friend!
    Michelangelo is my friend!
}}}

But honestly? You should use arrays for nearly all of these cases. Arrays have the benefit that they separate strings without the need for an explicit delimitor. That means your strings in the array can contain '''any''' valid character, without the worry that it might be your string delimitor (like the space is in our example above). Using arrays in our example above gives us the ability to add middle or last names of our friends:

{{{
    $ friends=( "Marcus The Rich" "JJ The Short" "Timid Thomas" "Michelangelo The Mobster" )
    $ for friend in "${friends[@]}"
    > do echo "$friend is my friend!"; done
}}}

Note that in our previous `for` we used an ''unquoted'' `$friends`. This allowed ["BASH"] to split our `friends` string up into words. In this last example, we quoted the `${friends[@]}` ''Parameter Expansion''. Quoting an expansion of an array through the `@` index makes ["BASH"] expand that array into a sequence of its elements, '''where each element is wrapped into quotes'''.


[[Anchor(Readability)]]
== Readability ==

Almost just as important as the result of your code is the '''readability of your code'''.

Chances are that you aren't just going to write this script once and then forget about it. If so, you might as well delete it after using it. If you plan to continue using it, you should also plan to continue maintaining it. Unlike your room your code won't get dirty over time, but you will learn new techniques and new approaches constantly. You will also gain experience about how your script is used. All that new information you gather since the completion of your initial codebase should be used to maintain your code in such a way that it constantly improves. Your code should keep growing more userfriendly and more stable.

    Trust me when I say, no piece of code is ever 100% ready; with exception to some very short and useless chucks of nothingness.

To make it easier for yourself to keep your code healthy and improve it regularly you should keep an eye on the readability of what you write. When you return to a long loop after a year has passed since your last visit to it and you wish to improve it, add a feature, or debug something about it, believe me when I say you'd rather see this:

{{{
    friends=( "Marcus The Rich" "JJ The Short" "Timid Thomas" "Michelangelo The Mobster" )

    # Say something significant about my friends.
    for name in "${friends[@]}"; do

        # My first friend (in the list).
        if [[ $name = ${friends[0]} ]]; then
            echo $name was my first friend.

        # My friends those names start with M.
        elif [[ $name = M* ]]; then
            echo "$name starts with an M"

        # My short friends.
        elif [[ " $name " = *" Short "* ]]; then
            echo "$name is a shorty."

        # Friends I kind of didn't bother to remember.
        else
            echo "I kind of forgot what $name is like."

        fi

    done
}}}

Than being confronted with something like this:

{{{
    x=( Marcus\ The\ Rich JJ\ The\ Short
      Timid\ Thomas Michelangelo\ The\ Mobster)
    for name in "${x[@]}"
      do if [ "$name" = "$x" ]; then echo $name was my first friend.
     elif
       echo $name | \
      grep -qw Short
        then echo $name is a shorty.
     elif [ "x${name:0:1}" = "xM" ]
         then echo $name starts with an M; else
    echo I kind of forgot what $name \
     is like.; fi; done
}}}

And yes, I know this is an exagerated example, but I've seen some authentic code that actually has a lot in common with that last example.

For your own health, keep these few points in mind:
  * ''Healthy whitespace gives you breathing space''. Indent your code properly and consistently. Use blank lines to separate paragraphs or logic blocks.
  * ''Avoid backslash-escaping''. It's counter-intuitive and boggles the mind when overused. Even in small examples it takes your mind more effort to understand `a\ b\ c` than it takes to understand `'a b c'`.
  * ''Comment your way of thinking before you forget''. You might find that even code that looks totally common sense right now could become subject of ''"What the hell was I thinking when I wrote this?"'' or ''"What is '''this''' supposed to do?"''.
  * ''Consistency prevents mind boggles''. Be consistent in your naming style. Be consistent in your use of capitals. Be consistent in your use of shell features. No matter what your girlfriend says, it's good to be predictable and transparant.



[[Anchor(Debugging)]]
== Debugging ==

Very often you will find yourself clueless as to why your script isn't acting the way you want it to. Resolving this problem is always just a matter of common sense and debugging techniques.

[[BR]]

||<tablewidth="100%">||<style="text-align: center;">'''Diagnose The Problem'''||||

Unless you know what exactly the '''problem''' is, you most likely won't come up with a ''solution'' anytime soon. So make sure you understand what exactly goes wrong. Evaluate the symptoms and/or error messages.

If you must, try and formulate the problem as a sentence. This will also be vital if you're going to ask for help with other people about your problem. You don't want them to rewrite your whole script. You also don't want them to have to go through your whole script or run it so that they understand what's going on. No; '''you''' need to make the problem perfectly clear to '''yourself''' and to anybody trying to help you. ''This requirement stands until the day the human race inventes means of telepathy''.

[[BR]]

||<tablewidth="100%">||<style="text-align: center;">'''Minimize The Codebase'''||||

If staring at your code doesn't give you a devine intervention, the next thing you should do is try to minimize your codebase while maintaining the same problem.

Don't worry about preserving the functionality of your script. The only thing you want to preserve is the logic of the code block that seems buggy.

Often, the best way to do this is by copying your script to a new file and start deleting everything that seems irrelevant from it. Alternatively, you can make a new script that does something similar in the same code fashion.

As soon as you delete something that makes the problem go away, you'll have isolated the problem. If not, at least you're not staring at a massive script anymore, but hopefully at a stub of no more than 5-7 lines.

For example; if you have a script that lets you browse images in your image folder by date, and for some reason you can't manage to iterate over your images in the folder properly, it suffices to reduce the script to this part in it:

{{{
    for image in $(ls -R "$imgFolder"); do
        echo "$image"
    done
}}}

Your actual script will be far more complex, and the inside of the `for` loop will also be far longer. But the essence of the problem is this code. Once you've reduced your problem to this it may be easier to see the problem you're facing. Your `echo` spits out parts of image names; it looks like all whitespace is replaced by newlines. That must be because `echo` is ran for each chunk terminated by whitespace, not for every image name (as a result, it seems the output has split open image names with whitespace in them). With this reduced code; it's easier to see that the cause is actually your `for` statement that splits up the output of `ls` into words. That's because `ls` is '''UNPARSABLE''' in a bugless manner (do not ever use `ls` in scripts, unless if you want to show its output to a user).

The fix would be:

{{{
    find "$imgFolder" -print0 | while read -d$'\0' image; do
        echo "$image"
    done
}}}

Now that you've fixed the problem in this tiny example, it's easy to merge it back into the original script.

[[BR]]

||<tablewidth="100%">||<style="text-align: center;">'''Activate ["BASH"]'s Debug Mode'''||||

If you still don't see the error of your ways, ["BASH"]'s debugging mode might help you see the problem through the code.

When ["BASH"] runs with the `x` option turned on, it prints out every command it executes before executing it. This is, '''after any expansions have been applied'''. As a result, you can see exactly what's happening as each line in your code is executed. Pay very close attention to the quoting used. ["BASH"] uses quotes to show you exactly which strings are passed as a single argument.

There are three ways of turning on this mode.

  * Run the script with `bash -x`:

  {{{
      $ bash -x ./mybrokenscript
  }}}

  * Modify your script's header:

  {{{
      #! /bin/bash -x

      [.. script ..]
  }}}

  * Or add `set -x` somewhere in your code to turn on this mode for only a specific block of your code:
  {{{
      #! /bin/bash

      [..irrelevant script code..]

      set -x
      [..relevant script code..]
      set +x

      [..irrelevant script code..]
  }}}

[[BR]]

||<tablewidth="100%">||<style="text-align: center;">'''Reread The Manual'''||||

If your script still doesn't seem to agree with you, maybe your perception of the way things work is wrong. Try going back to the manual (or this guide) to re-evaluate whether commands do exactly what you think they do, or the syntax is what you think it is. Very often people misunderstand what `for` does, how ''Word Splitting'' works, or how often they should use quotes.

Keep the tips and good practice guidelines in this guide in mind as well. They often help you avoid bugs and problems with scripts.

I mentioned this in the ''Scripts'' section of this guide too, but it's worth repeating it here. First of all, make sure your script's '''header''' is actually '''`#! /bin/bash`'''. If it is '''missing''' or if it's something like '''`#! /bin/sh`''' then you deserve the problems you're having. That means you're probably not even using ["BASH"] to run your code. Obviously that'll cause issues. Also, make sure you have no ''Carriage Return'' characters at the ends of your lines. This is the cause of scripts written in ''Microsoft Windows(tm)''. You can get rid of these fairly easily like this:

{{{
    $ tr -d '\r' < myscript > tmp && mv tmp myscript
}}}

[[BR]]

||<tablewidth="100%">||<style="text-align: center;">'''Read the FAQ / Pitfalls'''||||

The ["BashFAQ"] and ["BashPitfalls"] pages explain common misconceptions and issues encountered by other ["BASH"] scripters. It's very likely that your problem will be described there in some shape or form.

To be able to find your problem in there, you'll obviously need to have ''Diagnosed'' it properly. You'll need to know what you're looking for.

[[BR]]

||<tablewidth="100%">||<style="text-align: center;">'''Ask Us On IRC'''||||

There are people in the `#bash` channel almost 24/7. This channel resides on the `freenode` IRC network. To reach us, you need an IRC client. Connect it to `irc.freenode.net`, and `/join #bash`.

Make sure that you know what your real problem is and know how to explain it well. We don't like having to guess at things. Perhaps it might help us if you explained what you're trying to do with your script.

Either way, please have a look at this page before entering `#bash`: ["XyProblem"].

Introduction

This guide is currently still a work in progress. It grows a little every day. You are invited to make additions or modifications so long as you can keep them accurate (and linguistically correct).

All the information here is presented without any warranty or guarantee of accuracy. Use it at your own risk. When in doubt, please consult the man pages or the GNU info pages as the authoritative references.

["BASH"] is a BourneShell compatible shell, which adds many new features to its ancestor. Most of them are available in the 'KornShell', too.

TableOfContents

Anchor(About)

About This Guide

This guide aims to become a point of reference for people interested in learning to work with ["BASH"]. It aspires to teach its readers good practice techniques in developing scripts for the ["BASH"] interpreter and educate them about the internal operation of ["BASH"].

This guide is targetted at beginning users. It assumes no basic knowledge, but rather expects you to have enough common sense to put two and two together. If something is unclear to you, you should report this so that it may be clarified in this document for future readers.

You are invited to contribute to the development of this document by extending it or correcting invalid or incomplete information.

The maintainer(s) of this document:

  • -- ["Lhunath"]

Anchor(Definition)

A Definition

["BASH"] is an acronym for Bourne Again Shell. It is based on the Bourne shell and is mostly compatible with its features.

Shells are applications that provide users with the ability to give commands to their operating system interactively, or to allow them to execute batch processes quickly. In no way are they required for execution of processes; they are merely a layer between system function calls and the user.

  • Shell: A (possibly interactive) layer between the user and the system. BR ["BASH"]: The Bourne Again Shell, a Bourne compatible shell.

Anchor(Using_Bash)

Using Bash

Most users that think of ["BASH"] think of it as a prompt and a command line. That is ["BASH"] in interactive mode. ["BASH"] can also run in non-interactive mode through scripts. We can use scripts to automate certain logic. Scripts are basically lists of commands that you can type on the command line. When such a script is executed, all these commands are executed sequentially, one after another.

We'll start with the basics in an interactive shell. Once you're familiar with those, you can put them together in scripts.

  • Interactive mode: A mode of operation where a prompt asks you for one command at a time. Script: A file that contains a sequence of commands to execute one after the other.

Anchor(Scripts)

Scripts

A script is basically a sequence of commands that ["BASH"] processes in order. It only moves on to the next command when the current one has ended; unless if the current one has been executed asynchronously (in the background). Don't worry too much about the latter case yet, you'll learn about how that works later on.

Any example that you see in this guide can be used in a script just as well as on the command line.

Making a script is easy. You just make a new file, and put this in it at the top: 

    #! /bin/bash

This header makes sure than whenever your script is executed, ["BASH"] will be used as its interpreter. Please do not be fooled by stupid examples on the Internet that use /bin/sh as interpreter. sh is not bash. Even though sh's syntax and bash's look very much alike and even though most bash scripts will run in sh, a lot of the examples in this guide only apply to bash and will just break or cause unexpected behaviour in sh. As such, please refrain from acting like an arbitrary Windows kid and do not give your scripts that stupid .sh extension. It serves no purpose, and it's only just completely misleading (since it's going to be a bash script; not an sh script).

And by the way. It's perfectly fine if you use Windows to write your scripts, but if at all possible, avoid using Notepad for writing scripts. Microsoft Notepad can only make files with DOS-style line-endings. That means that each line you make in notepad will be ended by two characters: a Carriage Return and a Newline character. ["BASH"] reads lines as terminated by Newline characters only. As a result, the Carriage Return character will cause you increadible headache if you don't know it's there (very weird error messages). So take my advice and use a decent editor like [http://www.vim.org/ Vim] or [http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/ Emacs].

Once your script file has been made, you can run it like this: 

    $ bash myscript

In this example, we execute ["BASH"] and tell it to run our script. Alternatively, you can give your script executable permissions. When you do this, you can actually execute the script instead of executing ["BASH"] with it: 

    $ chmod +x myscript
    $ ./myscript

Some people like to keep their scripts in a personal directory. Others like to keep their scripts somewhere in the PATH variable. Most like to do both at once. Here's what I suggest you do: 

    $ mkdir -p "$HOME/.bin"
    $ echo 'PATH="$HOME/.bin:$PATH"' >> "$HOME/.bashrc"

The first command will make a directory called .bin in your home directory. The second command will add a line to your .bashrc file which adds the directory we just made to the beginning of the PATH variable. Every new instance of ["BASH"] will now check for executable scripts in your .bin directory.

To apply the changes of that line we added to .bashrc we obviously need to actually process .bashrc first. You can do that by closing your existing terminal and opening a new one. ["BASH"] will then initialize itself again by reading .bashrc amoungst others. Alternatively you can just execute that line of code on the command line (PATH="$HOME/.bin:$PATH") or manually process your .bashrc file in the running shell by running source "$HOME/.bashrc".

As a result, we can now put our script in our .bin directory and execute it as a normal application (we no longer need to prepend our script's name with its path; which was the ./ part in the previous examples): 

    $ mv myscript "$HOME/.bin"
    $ myscript

  • Tip: BR While you're defining the interpreter in your header; you might want to just take the time and explain your script's function and expected arguments a little too: 

    #! /bin/bash
    #
    #   scriptname argument [argument] ...
    #
    # A short explenation of your script's purpose.
    #
    # Copyright [date], [name]

  • Tip: BR You can use this header to specify optional arguments that you want to pass to the interpreter. For example, the following arguments will turn on some verbose debugging: 

    #! /bin/bash -xv

  • Header: The header of a script determines the application that will function as its interpreter (e.g. bash, sh, perl, ...).

Anchor(Basics)

The Basics

Anchor(Commands_Arguments)

Commands And Arguments

["BASH"] reads commands from its input (which is either a terminal or a file). In interactive mode, its input is your terminal. These commands can be aliases, functions, builtin commands, or executable applications.

  • Aliases: ["BASH"] can use aliases to make it easier to quickly execute complex commands. An alias is a name that is mapped to a certain string. Whenever that name is used as a command in bash, it is replaced by the string.

  • Functions: Functions in ["BASH"] are much like aliases, but more powerful and general. A function contains shell commands, very much like a script. When a function is called, the commands in it are executed.

  • Builtin Commands: ["BASH"] has some basic commands built into it, such as cd (change directory), if (conditional command execution), and so on.

  • Executable Applications: ["BASH"] uses a variable that tells it where to find other applications. This variable is called PATH, and it is a set of directory names separated by colons -- for example, /bin:/usr/bin. Each directory can contain executables. When a command is specified in ["BASH"] without a pathname (e.g. ls), and it isn't an alias, function or builtin, ["BASH"] searches the paths in PATH, in order from left to right, for this command. Since these commands are not part of ["BASH"] and run as separate processes, they are also called external commands.

Each command can be followed by arguments. It is very important that you understand how this works exactly. If you don't grasp these concepts well, the quality of your code will degrade significantly and you will introduce very dangerous bugs. So, pay close attention in the next few chapters. 

    $ ls
    a  b  c

ls is a command that lists files in the current directory. 

    $ mkdir d
    $ cd d
    $ ls

mkdir is a command that creates a new directory. We specified the argument d to that command. This way, the application mkdir is instructed to create a directory called d. After that, we use the application cd to change the current directory to d. ls shows us that the current directory (which is now d) is empty, since it doesn't display any filenames.

  • Tip: BR You can use the type command to figure out the type of a command. BR For example: 

    $ type rm
    rm is hashed (/bin/rm)
    $ type cd
    cd is a shell builtin

  • Alias: A name that is mapped to a string. Whenever that name is used as a command, it is replaced by the string it has mapped. BR Function: A name that is mapped to a script. Whenever that name is used as a command, the script is called with the arguments provided to the function's name on the command line. BR Builtin: Certain features have been built into ["BASH"]. These are handled internally whenever they are executed on the command line (and often do not create a new process). BR Application: A binary that can be executed by referring to it (/bin/ls) or if its location is in your PATH variable, you can execute it simply by using its name (ls).

Anchor(Argument_Splitting)

Argument Splitting

Commands in ["BASH"] can take multiple arguments. These arguments are used to tell the command exactly what it's supposed to do. In ["BASH"], you separate these arguments by whitespace (spaces, tabs and newlines). 

    $ ls
    $ touch a b c
    $ ls
    a  b  c

touch is an application that changes the 'Last Modified'-time of a certain file to the current time. If the filename that it's given does not exist yet, it simply creates that file, as a new and empty file. In this example, we passed three arguments. touch creates a file for each argument. ls shows us that three files have been created. 

    $ rm *
    $ ls
    $ touch a   b c
    $ ls
    a  b  c

rm is an application that removes all the files that it was given. * is a glob. It basically means all files in the current directory. You will read more about this later on.

Now, did you notice that there are several spaces between a and b, and only one between b and c? Also, notice that the files that were created by touch are no different than the first time. You now know that the amount of whitespace between arguments does not matter. This is important to know. For example: 

    $ echo This is a test.
    This is a test.
    $ echo This    is    a    test.
    This is a test.

In this case, we provide the echo command with four arguments. 'This', 'is', 'a' and 'test.'. echo takes these arguments, and prints them out one by one with a space in between. In the second case, the exact same thing happens. The extra spaces make no difference. To protect the whitespace properly, we need to pass the sentence as one single argument. We can do this by using quotes: 

    $ echo "This    is    a    test."
    This    is    a    test.

Quotes group everything together and pass it as a single argument. This argument is 'This    is    a    test.', properly spaced. echo prints this single argument out just like it always does.

Be very careful to avoid the following: 

    $ ls
    The secret voice in your head.mp3  secret
    $ rm The secret voice in your head.mp3
    rm: cannot remove `The': No such file or directory
    rm: cannot remove `voice': No such file or directory
    rm: cannot remove `in': No such file or directory
    rm: cannot remove `your': No such file or directory
    rm: cannot remove `head.mp3': No such file or directory
    $ ls
    The secret voice in your head.mp3

You need to make sure you quote filenames properly. If you don't you'll end up deleting the wrong things! rm takes filenames as arguments. If you do not quote filenames with spaces, rm thinks that each argument is another file. Since ["BASH"] splits your arguments at the spaces, rm will try to remove each word.

Please have a good look at http://bash-hackers.org/wiki/doku.php?id=syntax:words if all this isn't very clear to you yet.

  • Good Practice: BR You should always quote sentences or strings that belong together; even if it's not absolutely necessary. This will keep you alert and reduce the risk of human error in your scripts. BR For example, you should always quote arguments to the echo command.

  • Arguments: These are the optional additional words you can specify when running commands. They are appended to the command's name ('ls -l *' executes ls with two arguments). BR Quotes: The two forms of quotes (' and ") are used to protect certain special characters inside them from being interpreted as special by ["BASH"].

Anchor(Special_Characters)

Special Characters

There are several special characters in ["BASH"] that have a non-literal meaning. When we use these characters, ["BASH"] evaluates these characters and their meaning, but usually does not pass them on to the underlying commands.

Here are a few of those special characters, and what they do:

  • [whitespace]: Whitespace. Whitespace splits a command up into a name and (several) arguments.

  • "text": Double quotes. Double quotes protect the text inside from being split into multiple words or arguments. They also prevent the special meaning of single quotes inside.

  • 'text': Single quotes. Single quotes protect the text inside from any kind of expansion by the shell and keeps it from being split into multiple words or arguments. They also prevent the special meaning of all special characters inside.

  • # text: Comment character. Any text that follows until the first newline is not processed as shell commands or arguments.

  • ;: Command separator. The colon is used to separate multiple commands from each other if the user chooses to keep them on the same line. It's basically the same thing as a newline.

  • \: Escape character. The escape character protects the next character from being used in any special sort of way.

  • > or <: Redirection character. These characters are used to modify (redirect) the input and/or output of a command.

  • expression: Test expression. This evaluates the conditional expression.

  • { commands; }: Command Group. This executes the commands inside the braces as though they were only one command. It is convenient for places where ["BASH"] syntax requires only one command to be present.

  • command, $(command): Command substitution (The latter form is highly preferred). Command substitution executes the command inside the substitution form first, and replaces itself by that command's output.

  • (command): Subshell Execution. This executes the command in a new bash shell, instead of in the current.

  • ((expression)): Arithmetic Evaluation. Inside the parentheses, operators such as +, -, * and / are seen as mathematical operators.

  • $((expression)): Arithmetic Expansion. Comparable to the above, however this expression is replaced the result of its arithmetic evaluation.

  • $: Expansion character. This character is used for any form of parameter expansion. More about this later.

Some examples: 

    $ echo "I am $USER"
    I am lhunath
    $ echo 'I am $USER'
    I am $USER
    $ # boo
    $ echo An open\ \ \ space
    An open   space
    $ echo "My computer is $(hostname)"
    My computer is Lyndir
    $ echo boo > file
    $ echo $(( 5 + 5 ))
    10
    $ (( 5 > 0 )) && echo "Five is bigger than zero."
    Five is bigger than zero.

  • Special Characters: Characters that have a special meaning to ["BASH"]. Usually their meaning is interpreted and afterwards they are removed from the command before executing it.

Anchor(Parameters)

Parameters

Parameters should be seen as a sort of named space in memory where you can store your data. Generally speaking, they will store string data, but can also be used to store integers or arrays.

  • Parameters: Parameters store data that can be retrieved through a symbol or a name.

Special Parameters and Variables

Let's get your vocabulary straight before we get into the real deal. There are Parameters and Variables. Variables are actually just a kind of parameters. Parameters that are denoted by a name. Parameters that aren't variables are called Special Parameters I'm sure you'll understand things better with a few examples: 

    $ # Some parameters that aren't variables:
    $ echo My shell is $0, and was started with these options: $-
    My shell is -bash, and was started with these options: himB
    $ # Some parameters that ARE variables:
    $ echo I am $USER, and I live at $HOME.
    I am lhunath, and I live at /home/lhunath.

Please note: Unlike PHP/Perl/... parameters do NOT start with a $-sign. The $-sign you see in the examples merely causes the parameter that follows it to be expanded. Expansion basically means that the shell replaces it by its content. As such, USER is the parameter (variable), that contains your username. $USER will be replaced with its content; which in my case, is lhunath.

I think you've got the drift now. Here's a summary of most Special Parameters:

  • Positional Parameters: 0, 1, 2, ...; They contain the n'th argument that was passed to the current script.

  • Special Parameters:

    • *: Expands to a string enumerating all positional parameters.

    • @: Depending on the context in which it is used, expands to either a string enumerating all positional parameters, or several strings; one for each parameter.

    • #: Expands to the amount of positional parameters that are currently set.

    • ?: Expands to the exit code of the most recently completed foreground application.

    • $: Expands to the ["PID"] of the current shell.

    • !: Expands to the ["PID"] of the application most recently executed in the background.

    • _: Expands to the last argument of the last command that was executed.

And here are some examples of Variables that the shell initializes for you:

  • BASH_VERSION: Contains a string describing the version of ["BASH"].

  • HOSTNAME: Contains the hostname of your computer, I swear.

  • PPID: Contains the ["PID"] of the process that started this shell.

  • PWD: Contains the current directory.

  • RANDOM: Each time you expand this variable, a random number between 0 and 32767 is generated.

  • UID: The integer ID of the current user.

  • COLUMNS: The amount of characters fit on one line in your terminal. (The width of your terminal in characters.)

  • LINES: The amount of lines that fit in your terminal. (The height of your terminal in lines.)

  • HOME: The current user's home directory.

  • PATH: A colon-separated list of paths that will be searched to find the executable for a command that is executed, if it is not an alias or a function (or absolutely referenced).

  • PS1: Contains a string that describes the format of your shell prompt.

  • TMPDIR: Contains the directory that is used to store temporary files (by the shell).

Of course, you aren't restricted to only these variables. Feel free to define your own: 

    $ country=Canada
    $ echo "I am $USER and I currently live in $country."
    I am lhunath and I currently live in Canada.

Notice what we did to assign the value Canada to the variable country. Remember that you are NOT allowed to have any spaces before or after that equals sign! 

    $ language = PHP
    -bash: language: command not found
    $ language=PHP
    $ echo "I'm far too used to $language."
    I'm far too used to PHP.

Remember that ["BASH"] is not Perl or PHP. You need to be very well aware of how expansion works to avoid big trouble. If you don't, you'll end up creating very dangerous situations in your scripts, especially when making this mistake with rm: 

    $ ls
    no secret  secret
    $ file='no secret'
    $ rm $file
    rm: cannot remove `no': No such file or directory

Imagine we have two files, no secret and secret. The first contains nothing useful, but the second contains the secret that will save the world from impending doom. Unthoughtful as you are, you forgot to quote your parameter expansion of file. ["BASH"] expands the parameter and the result is rm no secret. ["BASH"] splits the arguments up by their whitespace as it normally does, and rm is passed two arguments; 'no' and 'secret'. As a result, it fails to find the file no and it deletes the file secret. The secret is lost!

  • Good Practice: BR You should always keep parameter expansions well quoted. This prevents the whitespace or the possible globs inside of them to give you gray hair or unexpectedly wipe stuff off your computer. The only good PE, is a quoted PE.

  • Variable: A variable is a kind of parameter that you can create and modify directly. It is denoted by a name and has several attributes. BR Expansion: Expansion happens when a parameter is prefixed by a dollar sign. ["BASH"] takes the parameter's value and replaces the parameter's expansion by its value before executing the command.

Anchor(Variables)

Variable Types

Although ["BASH"] is not a typed language, it does have a few different types of variables. These types define the kind of content they have. They are stored in the variable's attributes.

Attributes are settings for a variable. They define the way the variable will behave. Here are the attributes you can assign to a variable:

  • Array: (declare -a [variable]): The variable is an array of strings.

  • Integer: (declare -i [variable]): The variable holds an integer. Assigning values to this variable automatically triggers Arithmetic Evaluation.

  • Read Only: (declare -r [variable]): The variable can no longer be modified or unset.

  • Export: (declare -x [variable]): The variable is marked for export which means it will be inherited by any subshell.

Arrays are basically lists of strings. They are very convenient for their ability to store different elements without relying on a delimiter. That way, you don't need to worry about the fact that this delimiter could possibly end up being part of an element's content and thus split that element up: 

    $ files='one:two:three:four'

Here we try to use a string to contain a list of files. To do that, we need to rely on a delimiter to keep the files apart. We choose ':'. As a result, we cannot add any files to the list that have a ':' in their filename. That's why arrays are so convenient: 

    $ files=( 'one' 'two' 'three' 'four' '5: five' )

As shown above, you can assign arrays using (...). In this case, elements are separated by whitespace; but you can protect an element's whitespace with quotes. If you want to use some form of expansion to assign values to an array, rather than literal, be aware that ["BASH"] will obviously need to perform some form of word splitting to figure out which parts of your expansion should be put in which elements of the array: 

    $ files='one:two:three:four'
    $ IFS=:
    $ files=( $files )

For this word splitting, ["BASH"] looks at the first character in IFS again. There, it finds the delimiter to use for splitting the result of the expansion up in elements.

Defining variables as integers has the advantage that you can leave out some syntax when trying to assign or modify them: 

    $ a=5; a+=2; echo $a; unset a
    52
    $ a=5; let a+=2; echo $a; unset a
    7
    $ declare -i a=5; a+=2; echo $a; unset a
    7
    $ a=5+2; echo $a; unset a
    5+2
    $ declare -i a=5+2; echo $a; unset a
    7

  • String: A string is a sequence of characters. BR Array: An array is a list of strings that does not use a delimiter to separate them. BR Integer: An integer is a form of data that can only contain digits. BR Read Only: Parameters that are read-only cannot be modified or unset. BR Export: Variables that are marked for export will be inherited by any subshell.

Anchor(Parameter_Expansion)

Parameter Expansion

Parameter Expansion is the term that refers to any operation that causes a parameter to be expanded (replaced by content). In its most basic appearance, the parameter expansion of a parameter is achieved by prefixing that parameter with a $ sign. In certain situations, additional curly brackets around the parameter's name are required: 

    $ echo "'$USER', '$USERs', '${USER}s'"
    'lhunath', '', 'lhunaths'

This example illustrates what basic parameter expansions look like. The second PE results in an empty string. That's because the parameter USERs is empty. We did not intend to have the s be part of the parameter name. Since there's no way for ["BASH"] to determine whether you want the s appended to the name of the parameter or its value you need to use curly brackets to mark the beginning and end of the parameter name. That's what we do in the third PE in our example above.

Parameter Expansion can also be used to modify the string that will be expanded. These operations are terribly convenient: 

    $ for file in *.JPG *.jpeg
    > do mv "$file" "${file%.*}.jpg"
    > done

The code above can be used to rename all JPEG files with a JPG or a jpeg extension to have a normal jpg extension. The PE (${file%.*}) cuts off everything from the end until it finds a period (.). Then, in the same quotes, a new extension is appended to the expansion result.

Here's a summary of most PEs that are available:

  • ${parameter:-word}: Use Default Values. If 'parameter' is unset or null, the expansion of 'word' is substituted. Otherwise, the value of 'parameter' is substituted.

  • ${parameter:=word}: Assign Default Values. If 'parameter' is unset or null, the expansion of 'word' is assigned to 'parameter'. The value of 'parameter' is then substituted.

  • ${parameter:?word}: Display Error if Null or Unset. If 'parameter' is null or unset, the expansion of 'word' (or a message to that effect if 'word' is not present) is written to the standard error and the shell, if it is not interactive, exits. Otherwise, the value of 'parameter' is substituted.

  • ${parameter:+word}: Use Alternate Value. If 'parameter' is null or unset, nothing is substituted, otherwise the expansion of 'word' is substituted.

  • ${parameter:offset:length} Substring Expansion. Expands to up to 'length' characters of 'parameter' starting at the character specified by 'offset'. If 'length' is omitted, expands to the substring of 'parameter' starting at the character specified by 'offset'.

  • ${#parameter}: The length in characters of the value of 'parameter' is substituted.

  • ${parameter#pattern}: The 'pattern' is anchored to the beginning of 'parameter'. The result of the expansion is the expanded value of 'parameter' with the shortest match deleted.

  • ${parameter##pattern}: The 'pattern' is anchored to the beginning of 'parameter'. The result of the expansion is the expanded value of 'parameter' with the longest match deleted.

  • ${parameter%pattern}: The 'pattern' is anchored to the end of 'parameter'. The result of the expansion is the expanded value of 'parameter' with the shortest match deleted.

  • ${parameter%%pattern}: The 'pattern' is anchored to the end of 'parameter'. The result of the expansion is the expanded value of 'parameter' with the longest match deleted.

  • ${parameter/pattern/string}: The 'pattern' is not anchored but evaluated from left to right in the value of 'parameter'. The result of the expansion is the expanded value of 'parameter' with the shortest match of 'pattern' replaced by 'string'.

  • ${parameter//pattern/string}: The 'pattern' is not anchored but evaluated from left to right in the value of 'parameter'. The result of the expansion is the expanded value of 'parameter' with the longest match of 'pattern' replaced by 'string'.

You will learn them all through experience. They will come in handy far more often than you think they might. Here's a few examples to kickstart you: 

    $ file="$HOME/.secrets/007"; \
    > echo "File location: $file"; \
    > echo "Filename: ${file##*/}"; \
    > echo "Directory of file: ${file%/*}"; \
    > echo "Non-secret file: ${file/secrets/not_secret}"; \
    > echo; \
    > echo "Other file location: ${other:-There is no other file}"; \
    > echo "Using file if there is no other file: ${other:=$file}"; \
    > echo "Other filename: ${other##*/}"; \
    > echo "Other file location length: ${#other}"
    File location: /home/lhunath/.secrets/007
    Filename: 007
    Directory of file: /home/lhunath/.secrets
    Non-secret file: /home/lhunath/.not_secret/007
    
    Other file location: There is no other file
    Using file if there is no other file: /home/lhunath/.secrets/007
    Other filename: 007
    Other file location length: 26

Remember the difference between ${v#p} and ${v##p}. The doubling of the # character means metacharacters will become greedy. The same counts for % and /: 

    $ version=1.5.9; echo "MAJOR: ${version%%.*}, MINOR: ${version#*.}."
    MAJOR: 1, MINOR: 5.9.
    $ echo "Dash: ${version/./-}, Dashes: ${version//./-}."
    Dash: 1-5.9, Dashes: 1-5-9.

Note: You cannot nest PEs together. If you need to execute multiple PEs on a parameter, you will need to use multiple statements: 

    $ file=$HOME/image.jpg; file=${file##*/}; echo "${file%.*}"
    image

  • Good Practice: BR You may be tempted to use external applications such as sed, awk, cut, perl or others to modify your strings. Be aware that all of these require an extra process to be started, which in some cases can cause slowdowns. Parameter Expansions are the perfect alternative.

  • Parameter Expansion: Any expansion (see earlier definition) of a parameter. Certain operations are possible during this expansion that are performed on the value that will be expanded.

Anchor(Patterns)

Patterns

Patterns are strings that are used to match a whole range of strings. They have a special format depending on the pattern dialect which describes the kinds of strings that they match. Regular Expression patterns can even be used to grab certain pieces out of the strings they match.

On the command line you will mostly use Glob Patterns. They are a fairly straight-forward form of patterns that can easily be used to match a range of files.

Since version 3.0, ["BASH"] also supports Regular Expression patterns. These will be useful mainly in scripts to test user input or parse data.

  • Pattern: A pattern is a string with a special format designed to be a sort of key that matches several other strings of a kind.

Anchor(Globs)

Glob Patterns

Globs are a very important concept in ["BASH"]; if only for their incredible convenience. Properly understanding globs will benefit you in many ways. Globs are basically patterns that can be used to match filenames or other strings.

Globs are composed of normal characters and meta characters. Meta characters are characters that have a special meaning. These are the basic meta characters:

  • *: Matches any string, including the null string.

  • ?: Matches any single character.

  • [...]: Matches any one of the enclosed characters.

Here's an example of how we can use glob patterns to expand to filenames: 

    $ ls
    a  abc  b  c
    $ echo *
    a abc b c
    $ echo a*
    a abc

["BASH"] sees the glob, for example a*. It expands this glob, by looking in the current directory and matching it against all files there. Any filenames that match the glob, are enumerated and replaced by the glob. As a result, the statement echo a* is replaced by the statement echo a abc, and is then executed.

["BASH"] will always make sure that whitespace and special characters are escaped properly when expanding the glob. For example: 

    $ touch "a b.txt"
    $ ls
    a b.txt
    $ rm *
    $ ls

Here, rm * is expanded into rm a\ b.txt. This makes sure that the string a b.txt is passed as a single argument to rm, since it represents a single file. It is important to understand that using globs to enumerate files is nearly always a better idea than using ls for that purpose. Here's an example with some more complex syntax which we will cover later on, but it will illustrate the problem very well: 

    $ ls
    a b.txt
    $ for file in `ls`; do rm "$file"; done
    rm: cannot remove `a': No such file or directory
    rm: cannot remove `b.txt': No such file or directory
    $ for file in *; do rm "$file"; done
    $ ls

Here we use the for command to go through the output of the ls command. The ls command results in a string a b.txt. The for command splits that string into arguments over which it iterates. As a result, for iterates over a and b.txt. Naturally, this is not what we want. The glob however expands in the proper form. It results in the string a\ b.txt, which for takes as a single argument.

["BASH"] also supports a feature called Extended Globs. These globs are more powerful in nature. This feature is turned off by default, but can be turned on with the shopt command, which is used to toggle shell options: 

    $ shopt -s extglob

  • ?(list): Matches zero or one occurrence of the given patterns.

  • *(list): Matches zero or more occurrences of the given patterns.

  • +(list): Matches one or more occurrences of the given patterns.

  • @(list): Matches one of the given patterns.

  • !(list): Matches anything except one of the given patterns.

The list inside the parentheses is a list of globs separated by the | character. Here's an example: 

    $ ls
    names.txt  tokyo.jpg  california.bmp
    $ echo !(*jpg|*bmp)
    names.txt

Our glob now expands to anything that does not match the *jpg or the *bmp pattern. Only the text file passes for that, so it is expanded.

Then, there is Brace Expansion. Brace Expansion technically does not fit in the category of Globs, but it is similar. Globs only expand to actual filenames, where brace expansion will expand to any permutation of the pattern. Here's how they work: 

    $ echo th{e,a}n
    then than
    $ echo {/home/*,/root}/.*profile
    /home/axxo/.bash_profile /home/lhunath/.profile /root/.bash_profile /root/.profile
    $ echo {1..9}
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    $ echo {0,1}{0..9}
    00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

  • Good Practice: BR You should always use globs in favor of ls (or similar) to enumerate files. Globs will always expand safely and minimize the risk for bugs. BR You can sometimes end up with some very weird filenames. Generally speaking, scripts aren't always tested against all the odd cases that it may end up being used with.

  • Glob: A glob is a string composed of glob meta characters that can match certain strings or filenames.

Anchor(Regex)

Regular Expressions

Regular Expressions (regex) are similar to Glob Patterns but cannot be used for filename matching in ["BASH"]. Since 3.0 ["BASH"] supports the =~ operator to the [[ built-in. This operator matches the string that comes before it against the pattern that follows it. When the string matches the pattern, [[ returns with an exit code of 0. If the string does not match the pattern, an exit code of 1 is returned. In case the pattern's syntax is invalid, [[ will abort the operation and return an exit code of 2.

["BASH"] uses the Extended Regular Expression (ERE) dialect. I will not teach you about regex in this guide, but if you are interested in this concept; please read up on [http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap09.html#tag_09_04 Extended Regular Expressions] or Google for a tutorial.

Regular Expression patterns that use capturing groups will have their captured strings assigned to the BASH_REMATCH variable for later retrieval.

Let's illustrate how regex can be used in ["BASH"]: 

    $ if [[ $LANG =~ (..)_(..) ]]
    > then echo "You live in ${BASH_REMATCH[2]} and speak ${BASH_REMATCH[1]}."
    > else echo "Your locale was not recougnised"
    > fi

Be aware that regex parsing in ["BASH"] has changed between releases 3.1 and 3.2. Before 3.2 it was safe to wrap your regex pattern in quotes but this has changed in 3.2. Since then, regex should always be unquoted. You should protect any special characters by escaping it using a backslash. 

    $ [[ "My sentence" =~ My\ sentence ]]

Be careful to escape any characters that the shell could misinterprete; such as whitespace, dollar signs followed by text, braces, etc.

  • Good Practice: BR Since the way regex is used in 3.2 is also valid in 3.1 we highly recommend you just never quote your regex. Remember to keep special characters properly escaped!

  • Regular Expression: A regular expression is a more complex pattern that can be used to match specific strings (but unlike globs cannot expand to filenames).

Anchor(Conditionals)

Tests and Conditionals

Sequential execution of applications is one thing, but to achieve a sort of logic in your scripts or your command line one-liners, you'll need variables and conditionals. Conditionals are used to determine the execution flow of a script.

Anchor(Exit_Status)

Exit Status

Every application results in an exit code whenever it terminates. This exit code is used by whatever application started it to evaluate whether everything went OK. This exit code is like a return value from functions. It's an integer between 0 and 255 (inclusive). Convention dictates that we use 0 to denote success, and any other number to denote failure of some sort. The specific number is entirely application-specific, and is used to hint as to what exactly went wrong.

For example, the ping command sends ICMP packets over the network to a certain host. That host normally responds to this packet by sending the exact same one right back. This way, we can check whether the remote host can receive our packets. ping has a range of exit codes which can tell us what went wrong, if anything did:

From the ping manual:

  • If ping does not receive any reply packets at all it will exit with code 1. If a packet count and deadline are both specified, and fewer than count packets are received by the time the deadline has arrived, it will also exit with code 1. On other error it exits with code 2. Otherwise it exits with code 0. This makes it possible to use the exit code to see if a host is alive or not.

The parameter ? shows us the exit code of the last foreground process that terminated. Let's play around a little with ping to see it's exit codes: 

    $ ping God
    ping: unknown host God
    $ echo $?
    2

    $ ping -c 1 -W 1 1.1.1.1
    PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
    
    --- 1.1.1.1 ping statistics ---
    1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms
    $ echo $?
    1

  • Good Practice: BR You should make sure that your scripts always return a non-zero exit code if something unexpected happened in its execution. You can do this with the exit builtin: 

    rm file || { echo "Could not delete file!"; exit 1; }

  • Exit Code / Exit Status: Whenever a command ends it notifies its parent (which in our case will always be the shell that started it) of its exit status. This is represented by a number ranging from 0 to 255. This code is a hint as to the success of the command's execution.

Anchor(Control_Operators)

Control Operators

Now that we know what exit codes are, and that an exit code of '0' means the command's execution was successful, we'll learn to use this information. The easiest way of performing a certain action depending on the success of a previous command is through the use of 'control operators'. These operators are && and ||, which respectively represent a logical AND and a logical OR. These operators are used inbetween two commands, and they are used to control whether the second command should be executed depending on the success of the first.

Let's put that theory in practice: 

    $ mkdir d && cd d

This simple example has two commands, mkdir d and cd d. You could easily just use a semi-colon there to separate both commands and execute them sequentially; but we want something more. In the above example, ["BASH"] will execute mkdir d, then && will check the result of the mkdir application as it finishes. If the mkdir application resulted in a success (exit code 0), then && will execute the next command, cd d. If mkdir d failed, and returned a non-0 exit code, && will skip the next command, and we will stay in the current directory.

Another example: 

    $ rm /etc/some_file.conf || echo "I couldn't remove the file!"

    rm: cannot remove `/etc/some_file.conf': No such file or directory
    I couldn't remove the file!

|| is much like &&, but it does the exact opposite. It only executes the next command if the first failed. As such, the message is only echoed if the rm command was unsuccessful.

You can make a sequence with these operators, but you have to be very careful when you do. Remember what exit code the operator is really going to be checking against! Here's an example that might cause confusion: 

    $ false && true || echo "Riddle, riddle?"
    Riddle, riddle?

    $ true && false || echo "Riddle, riddle?"
    Riddle, riddle?

true is obviously always going to be successful. false is obviously always going to be unsuccessful. Can you guess why the echo statement is executed in both occasions?

The key to understanding how to sequence these operators properly is by evaluating exit codes from left to right.

In the first example, false is unsuccessful, so && does not execute the next command (which is true), but the next || gets a shot too. || still sees that the last exit code was that from false, and || executes the next command when the previous was unsuccessful. As a result, the echo statement is executed.

The same for the second statement again. true is successful, so the && executes the next statement. That is false; the last exit code now becomes unsuccessful. After that, || is evaluated, which sees the unsuccessful exit code from false and executes the echo statement.

It's all easy with trues and falses; but how about real commands? 

    $ rm file && touch file || echo "File not found!"

All seems well with this piece of code, and when you test it, I'm sure you'll see that it actually does what it's supposed to. It tries to delete a file, and if it succeeds, it creates it again as a new and empty file; if something goes wrong we get the error message. What's the catch?

Perhaps you guessed, perhaps not, but here's a hint: Imagine we're in a directory where we don't have permission to create a file? It won't stop us from deleting the file if the file happens to be ours. rm will succeed in deleting our file, but touch will fail to create it anew because of permission issues. As a result, we get a strange error message saying that the file wasn't found while we were actually trying to create it. What's up with that?

  • Good Practice: BR It's best not to get overcourageous when dealing with conditional operators. They can make your script hard to understand, especially for a person that's assigned to maintain it and didn't write it himself.

  • Control Operators: These operators are used to link commands together. They check the exit code of the command that was previously ran to determine whether or not to execute the next command in the sequence.

Anchor(Conditionals)

Conditional Blocks

if is an application that executes the command that it receives as argument, and checks that command's exit code to see whether its execution was successful. Depending on that exit code, if executes a specific block of code. 

    $ if true
    > then echo "It was true."
    > else echo "It was false!"
    > fi

    It was true.

Here you see the basic outline of an if-statement. We start by calling if with the argument true. true is a sort of built-in application, running it is like running an application that always ends successfully. if runs that application, and once the application's done, it checks the exit code. Since true always exits successfully, if continues to the then-block, and executes its code. Should the true application have failed somehow, and returned an unsuccessful exit code, the if statement would have skipped the then code, and executed the else code block instead.

There are commands that can help us a lot in doing conditional checks. They are [ (also named test) and [[. [ is a normal application that reads its arguments and does some checks with them. [[ is much like [, however, it is not an application. It's a built-in and it offers far more versatillity. Let's get practical: 

    $ if [ a = b ]
    > then echo "a is the same as b."
    > else echo "a is not the same as b."
    > fi

    a is not the same as b.

if executes the command [ with the arguments 'a', '=', 'b' and ']'. [ uses these arguments to determine what must be checked. It then checks whether the string 'a' is identical to the string 'b', and if this is the case, it will exit successfully. However, since we know this is not the case, [ will not exit successfully (it's exit code will be 1). if sees that [ terminated unsuccessfully and executes the code in the else block.

Now, to see why [[ is so much more interesting and trustworthy than [, let us highlight some possible problems with [: 

    $ if [ my dad = my dog ]
    > then echo "I have a problem."
    > fi

    -bash: [: too many arguments

Can you guess what caused the problem? BR [ was executed with the arguments 'my', 'dad', '=', 'my', 'dog' and ']'. [ doesn't understand what test it's supposed to execute, because it expects the second argument to be the operator. In our case, the operator is the third argument. Yet another reason why quotes are so terribly important. Whenever we type whitespace in bash that belongs together with the words before or after it, we need to quote the whole string: 

    $ if [ 'my dad' = 'my dog' ]
    > then echo "I have a problem."
    > fi

This time, [ sees an operator (=) in the second argument and it can continue with its work. Now, this may be easy to see and avoid, but it gets just a little trickier when we put the strings in variables, rather than literally in the statement: 

    $ dad='my dad'; dog='my dog'
    $ if [ $dad = $dog ]
    > then echo "I have a problem."
    > fi

    -bash: [: too many arguments

How did we mess up this time? BR Here's a hint: ["BASH"] takes our if-statement and expands all the parameters in it. The result is if [ my dad = my dog ]. Boom, game over.

Here's how it's supposed to look like: 

    $ if [ "$dad" = "$dog" ]
    > then echo "I have a problem."
    > fi

To help us out a little, ["BASH"] introduced a new style of conditional test. Original as the ["BASH"] authors are, they called it [[. [[ was loaded with several very interesting features which are missing from [. One of them helps us in dealing with parameter expansions: 

    $ if [[ $dad = $dog ]]
    > then echo "I have a problem."
    > fi
    $ if [[ I want $dad = I want $dog ]]
    > then echo "I want too much."
    > fi

    -bash: conditional binary operator expected
    -bash: syntax error near `want'

This time, $dad and $dog did not need quotes. Since [[ isn't an application (while [ is), but a built-in, it has special magical powers. It parses its arguments before they are expanded by bash and does the expansion itself; taking the result as a single argument, even if that result contains whitespace. However, be aware that simple strings still have to be quoted properly. [[ can't know whether your literal whitespace in the statement is intentional or not; so it splits it up just like ["BASH"] normally would. Let's fix our last example: 

    $ if [[ "I want $dad" = "I want $dog" ]]
    > then echo "I want too much."
    > fi

Now that you've got a decent understanding of quoting issues that may arise, let's have a look at some of the other features that [ and [[ were blessed with:

  • Tests supported by [ (also known as test):

    • -e FILE: True if file exists.

    • -f FILE: True if file is a regular file.

    • -d FILE: True if file is a directory.

    • -h FILE: True if file is a symbolic link.

    • -r FILE: True if file is readable by you.

    • -s FILE: True if file exists and is not empty.

    • -t FD : True if FD is opened on a terminal.

    • -w FILE: True if the file is writable by you.

    • -x FILE: True if the file is executable by you.

    • -O FILE: True if the file is effectively owned by you.

    • -G FILE: True if the file is effectively owned by your group.

    • FILE -nt FILE: True if the first file is newer than the second.

    • FILE -ot FILE: True if the first file is older than the second.

    • -z STRING: True if the string is empty (it's length is zero).

    • -n STRING: True if the string is not empty (it's length is not zero).

    • STRING = STRING: True if the first string is identical to the second.

    • STRING != STRING: True if the first string is not identical to the second.

    • STRING < STRING: True if the first string sorts before the second.

    • STRING > STRING: True if the first string sorts after the second.

    • EXPR -a EXPR: True if both expressions are true (logical AND).

    • EXPR -o EXPR: True if either expression is true (logical OR).

    • INT -eq INT: True if both integers are identical.

    • INT -ne INT: True if the integers are not identical.

    • INT -lt INT: True if the first integer is less than the second.

    • INT -gt INT: True if the first integer is greater than the second.

    • INT -le INT: True if the first integer is less than or equal to the second.

    • INT -ge INT: True if the first integer is greater than or equal to the second.

  • Additional tests supported only by [[:

    • STRING = (or ==) PATTERN: Not string comparison like with [ (or test), but pattern matching is performed. True if the string matches the glob pattern.

    • STRING =~ REGEX: True if the string matches the regex pattern.

    • ( EXPR ): Parantheses can be used to change the evaluation precedence.

    • EXPR && EXPR: Much like the '-a' operator of test, but does not evaluate the second expression if the first already turns out to be false.

    • EXPR || EXPR: Much like the '-o' operator of test, but does not evaluate the second expression if the first already turns out to be true.

    • ! EXPR: Inverses the result of the expression.

You want some examples? Sure: 

    $ test -e /etc/X11/xorg.conf && echo "Your Xorg is configured!"
    Your Xorg is configured!
    $ test -n "$HOME" && echo "Your homedir is set!"
    Your homedir is set!
    $ [[ boar != bear ]] && echo "Boars aren't bears!"
    Boars aren't bears!
    $ [[ boar != b?ar ]] && echo "Boars don't look like bears!"
    $ [[ $DISPLAY ]] && echo "Your DISPLAY variable is not empty, you probably have Xorg running."
    Your DISPLAY variable is not empty, you probably have Xorg running.
    $ [[ ! $DISPLAY ]] && echo "Your DISPLAY variable is not not empty, you probably don't have Xorg running."

  • Good Practice: BR Whenever you're making a ["BASH"] script, you should always use [[ (unless if for some reason you need very specific and rare functionality from [). BR Whenever you're making a Shell script, which may end up being used in an environment where ["BASH"] is not available, you should use [, because it is far more compatible (it's an application, not built into ["BASH"], like [[).

  • If (builtin): This command executes the command that is given on its arguments and depending on that command's exit code executes the code in the following then (or optionally else) block.

Anchor(Loops)

Conditional Loops

You've learned how to code some basic logic flow for your scripts. It's important that you understand a thing or two about keeping scripts healthy first.

["BASH"] scripts, much like any other kind of scripts, should never be overrated. Although they have great potential once you fully understand its features; they aren't always the right tool for the job. At the same time, when you make scripts, you should remember to keep them light, both in length and in complexity. Very long and/or very complex scripts are most often also very bad scripts. Those that aren't yet soon will be; because they are always very difficult to maintain and adapt/extend.

A technique that we can use to try and keep code length and complexity down is loops. There are two kinds of loops. Using the correct kind of loop correctly will help you keep your scripts readable and healthy.

["BASH"] supports while loops and for loops. The for loops can appear in three different forms. Here's a summary:

  • while [command]: Repeat so long as command is executed successfully (exit code: 0).

  • until [command]: Repeat so long as command is executed unsuccessfully (exit code: >0).

  • for [variable] in [words]: Repeat the loop for each word after putting it into the variable.

  • for (( [expression]; [expression]; [expression] )): Starts by evaluating the first expression, repeats the loop so long as the second expression is valid and at the end of each loop evaluates the third expression.

Let's put that in practice; here are some examples to illustrate the differences but also the similarities between the loops: 

    $ while true
    > do echo "Infinite loop!
    > done

    $ (( i=10 )); while (( i > 0 ))
    > do echo "$i empty cans of beer."
    > (( i-- ))
    > done

    $ for (( i=10; i > 0; i-- ))
    > do echo "$i empty cans of beer."
    > done

    $ for i in {10..0}
    > do echo "$i empty cans of beer."
    > done

The last three loops achieve exactly the same result; just in a different syntax. You'll encounter this many times in your shell scripting experience. There will nearly always be multiple approaches to solving a problem. The test of your skill soon won't be about solving a problem as much as about how best to solve it. You need to learn to pick the best angle of approach for the job. Usually, the main factors to keep into account will be the simplicity and flexibility of the resulting code. My personal favorite is the latter of the examples. In the example I used Brace Expansion to generate the words; but there are other ways, too.

Let's take a closer look at that last example, because although it looks the easier of both fors, it can often be the trickiest too; if you don't know exactly how it works.

As I mentioned before; it takes one word from a list of words and puts each in the variable, one at a time, then loops through the code with it. The tricky part is how ["BASH"] decides what the words are. Let me explain myself by expanding the braces from that previous example: 

    $ for i in 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
    > do echo "$i empty cans of beer."
    > done

["BASH"] takes the characters between in and the end of the statement, at splits them up into words. You shouldn't confuse the splitting that happens here with the splitting that happens with Commandline Arguments; even though they look exactly the same at first sight. Commandline arguments are split at spaces, tabs and newlines; while the splitting in this for statement happens at spaces by default. This default behaviour can be changed. The way for determines what delimiter to use for the splitting is by looking into the IFS variable; and taking the first character there. IFS is an acronym for Internal Field Separator; and by default it contains a space, a tab and a newline. Since the space is the first character there, for uses it to split up the words in our sequence; and feeds each word to the variable i; one at a time.

As a result; be VERY careful not to make the following mistake: 

    $ ls
    The best song in the world.mp3
    $ for file in $(ls *.mp3)
    > do rm "$file"
    > done

    rm: cannot remove `The': No such file or directory
    rm: cannot remove `best': No such file or directory
    rm: cannot remove `song': No such file or directory
    rm: cannot remove `in': No such file or directory
    rm: cannot remove `the': No such file or directory
    rm: cannot remove `world.mp3': No such file or directory

You should already know to quote the $file in the rm statement; but what's going wrong here? Right. ["BASH"] expands the command substitution ($(ls *.mp3)), replaces it by its output, and as a result executes for file in The best song in the world.mp3. ["BASH"] splits that up in words by using spaces and tries to rm each word. Boom, you are dead.

You want to quote it, you say? Let's add another song: 

    $ ls
    The best song in the world.mp3  The worst song in the world.mp3
    $ for file in "$(ls *.mp3)"
    > do rm "$file"
    > done
    rm: cannot remove `The best song in the world.mp3  The worst song in the world.mp3': No such file or directory

Quotes will indeed protect the whitespace in your filenames; but it will do more than that. The quotes will protect all the whitespace from the output of ls. There is no way ["BASH"] can know which parts of the output of ls represent filenames; it's not psychic. The output of ls is a simple string, and ["BASH"] treats it as that for lack of better. The for puts the whole quoted output in i and runs the rm command with it. Damn, dead again.

So what do we do? As suggested earlier; globs are your best friend: 

    $ for file in *.mp3
    > do rm "$file"
    > done

This time, ["BASH"] does know which are filenames, and it does know what the filenames are and as such it can split them up nicely. The result of expanding the glob is this: for file in "The best song in the world.mp3" "The worst song in the world.mp3". Problem resolved.

Let's talk about changing that delimiter. Say, you've got yourself a nice cooking recipe, and you want to write a script that tells you how to use it. Sure, let's get right at it: 

    $ recipe='2 c. all purpose flour
    > 6 tsp. baking powder
    > 2 eggs
    > 2 c. milk
    > 1/3 c. oil'

    $ for ingredient in $recipe
    > do echo "Take $ingredient; mix well."
    > done

Can you guess what the result will look like? I recommend you run the code if you can't and ponder the reason first. It will help you understand things.

Yes, as explained earlier, for splits its stuff up in words by using the delimiter from IFS.

To read the recipe correctly, we need to split it up by newlines instead of by spaces. Here's how we do that: 

    $ recipe='2 c. all purpose flour
    > 6 tsp. baking powder
    > 2 eggs
    > 2 c. milk
    > 1/3 c. oil'
    $ IFS=$'\n'

    $ for ingredient in $recipe
    > do echo "Take $ingredient; mix well."
    > done

    Take 2 c. all purpose flour; mix well.
    Take 6 tsp. baking powder; mix well.
    Take 2 eggs; mix well.
    Take 2 c. milk; mix well.
    Take 1/3 c. oil; mix well.

Beautiful.

Note: This delimiter is only used when the words consist of an expansion. Not when they're literal. Literal words are always split at spaces: 

    $ PATH=/bin:/usr/bin
    $ IFS=:

    $ for i in $PATH
    > do echo "$i"
    > done
    /bin
    /usr/bin

    $ for i in $PATH:/usr/local/bin
    > do echo "$i"
    > done
    /bin
    /usr/bin
    /usr/local/bin

    $ for i in /bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin
    > do echo "$i"
    > done
    /bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin

Lets focus a little more on the while loop. It promises even more simplicity than this for loop; so long as you don't need any for specific features. The while loop is very interesting for its capacity of executing commands and basing the loop's progress on the result of them. Here are a few examples of how while loops are very often used: 

    $ # The sweet machine; hand out sweets for a cute price.
    $ while read -p $'The sweet machine.\nInsert 20c and enter your name: ' name
    > do echo "The machine spits out three lollipops at $name."
    > done

    $ # Check your email every five minutes.
    $ while sleep 5m
    > do kmail --check
    > done

    $ # Wait for a host to come back online.
    $ while ! ping -c 1 -W 1 "$host"
    > do echo "$host is still unavailable."
    > done; echo -e "$host is available again!\a"

The until loop is barely ever used, if only because it is pretty much exactly the same as the while loop except for the fact that its command is not checked for an exit status of zero but for an exit status of non-zero. As a result, we could rewrite our last example using an until loop as such: 

    $ # Wait for a host to come back online.
    $ until ping -c 1 -W 1 "$host"
    > do echo "$host is still unavailable."
    > done; echo -e "$host is available again!\a"

  • Loop: A loop is a structure that is designed to repeat the code within until a certain condition has been fulfilled. At that point, the loop stops and the code beyond it is executed. BR For (builtin): A for-loop is a type of loop that sets a variable to a new value before repeating itself. BR While (builtin): A while-loop is a type of loop that continues to run its code so long as a certain command which is executed before each iteration executes successfully. BR Until (builtin): An until-loop is a type of loop that continues to run its code so long as a certain command which is executed before each iteration executes unsuccessfully.

Anchor(Choices)

Choices

Sometimes you just want to built application logic depending on the content of a variable but you already know all of the possible choices of content the variable can contain. You no longer need if's two yes or no blocks, but you want a block of code for every possible choice of content a variable can have. You could obviously attempt to emulate this behaviour using several if-statements: 

    $ if [[ $LANG = en* ]]
    > then echo "Hello!"; fi
    $ if [[ $LANG = fr* ]]
    > then echo "Salut!"; fi
    $ if [[ $LANG = de* ]]
    > then echo "Guten Tag!"; fi
    $ if [[ $LANG = nl* ]]
    > then echo "Hallo!"; fi
    $ if [[ $LANG = it* ]]
    > then echo "Ciao!"; fi

But let's say we like to actually make clean code, shall we? ["BASH"] provides a construct called case exactly for this kind of situation. A case construct basically enumerates several possible Glob Patterns and checks the content of your parameter against these: 

    $ case $LANG in
    > en*) echo "Hello!" ;;
    > fr*) echo "Salut!" ;;
    > de*) echo "Guten Tag!" ;;
    > nl*) echo "Hallo!" ;;
    > it*) echo "Ciao!" ;;
    > *)   echo "I do not speak your language." ;;
    > esac

Each choice in a case statement starts with a pattern followed by a block of code that is to be executed if the parameter's content matches that pattern, which in turn is followed by two semi-colons. case stops matching patterns as soon as one was successful. Therefore, we can use the * pattern in the end to match any case that has not been caught by the other choices.

Another construct of choice is the select construct. This statement smells like a loop and is a convenience statement for generating a menu of choices that the user can choose from.

The user is presented by choices and asked to enter a number reflecting his choice. The code in the select block is then executed with a variable set to the choice the user made. If the user's choice was invalid, the variable is made empty: 

    $ echo "Which of these does not belong in the group?"; \
    > select choice in Apple Pear Crisp Lemon Kiwi; do
    > if [[ $choice = Crisps ]]
    > then echo "Correct!  Crisps are no fruit."; break; fi
    > echo "Errr... no.  Try again."
    > done

The menu reappears so long as the break statement is not executed. In the example the break statement is only executed when the user makes the correct choice.

We can also use the PS3 variable to define the prompt the user replies on. Instead of showing the question before executing the select statement, we could choose to set the question as our prompt: 

    $ PS3="Which of these does not belong in the group (#)? " \
    > select choice in Apple Pear Crisp Lemon Kiwi; do
    > if [[ $choice = Crisps ]]
    > then echo "Correct!  Crisps are no fruit."; break; fi
    > echo "Errr... no.  Try again."
    > done

  • Case (builtin): This statement evaluates a parameter's value based on several given patterns (choices). BR Select (builtin): The select statement offers the user the choice between several options and executes a block of code for the user's choice.

Anchor(IO)

Input And Output

This basic principle of computer science applies just as well to applications started through ["BASH"]. ["BASH"] makes it fairly easy to play around with the input and output of commands, which gives us great flexibility and increadible opportunities for automation.

Anchor(FDs)

File Descriptors

Input and output from and to processes always occurs via so called File Descriptors (in short: FDs). FDs are kind of like pointers to sources of data. When something reads from or writes to that FD, the data is being read from or written to the FD's data source. FDs can point to regular files, but they can also point to more abstract data sources, like the input and output source of a process.

By default, every new process has three FDs. They are referred to by the names Standard Input, Standard Output and Standard Error. In short, they are respectively called stdin, stdout and stderr. The Standard Input is where the characters you type on your keyboard usually come from. The Standard Output is where the program sends most of its normal information to so that the user can see it, and the Standard Error is where the program sends its error messages to. Be aware that GUI applications work in the same way; but the actual GUI doesn't work via these FDs. GUI applications can still read and write from and to the standard FDs, but they usually don't. Usually, they do all the user interaction via that GUI; making it hard to control for ["BASH"]. As a result, we'll stick to simple console applications. Those we can easily feed data on the "Standard Input" and read data from on its "Standard Output" and "Standard Error".

Let's make these definitions a little more concrete. Here's a demonstration of how "Standard Input" and "Standard Output" work: 

    $ read -p "What is your name? " name; echo "Good day, $name.  Would you like some tea?"
    What is your name? lhunath
    Good day, lhunath.  Would you like some tea?

read is a command that reads information from stdin and stores it in a variable. We specified name to be that variable. Once read has read a line of information from stdin, it finished and lets echo display a message. echo uses stdout to send its output to. stdin is connected to your terminal's input device; which is probably going to be your keyboard. stdout is connected to your terminal's output device; which I assume is a computer monitor. As a result; you can type in your name and are then greeted with a friendly message on your monitor, offering you a cup of tea.

So what is stderr? Let's demonstrate: 

    $ rm secrets
    rm: cannot remove `secrets': No such file or directory

Unless if you had a file called secrets in your current directory; that rm command will fail and show an error message explaining what went wrong. Error messages like these are by convention displayed on stderr. stderr is also connected to your terminal's output device, just like stdout. As a result, error messages display on your monitor just like the messages on stdout. However, this separation makes it easy to keep errors separated from the application's normal messages. Some people like to use wrappers to make all the output on stderr red, so that they can see the error messages more clearly. This is not generally advisable, but it is a simple example of the many options this separation provides us with.

  • Good Practice: BR Remember that when you create scripts, you should send your custom error messages to the stderr FD. This is a convention and it is very convenient when applications follow the convention. As such, so should you! You'll about redirection soon, but let me show you quickly how it's done: 

    echo "Uh oh.  Something went really bad.." >&2

  • File Descriptor: Basically this is just a "description" of where to read input from and where to send output to. Each command has at least three basic descriptors: FD 0 is stdin, FD 1 is stdout and FD 2 is stderr.

Anchor(Redirection)

Redirection

The most basic form of input/output manipulation in ["BASH"] is Redirection. Redirection is used to change the data source or destination of an application's FDs. That way, you can send the application's output to a file instead of the terminal, or have the application read from a file instead of from the keyboard.

Redirection, too, comes in different shapes. There's File Redirection, File Descriptor manipulation, Heredocs and Herestrings.

  • Redirection: This is the practice of changing a certain FD to read its input from or send its output to elsewhere.

Anchor(File_Redirection)

File Redirection

File Redirection is probably the most basic form of redirection. I'll start with this so you can grasp the concept of redirection well. 

    $ echo "The story of William Tell.
    >
    > It was a cold december night.  Too cold to write." > story
    $ cat story
    The story of William Tell.
    
    It was a cold december night.  Too cold to write.

As a result; the echo command will not send its output to the terminal, but the > story operation changes the destination of the stdout FD so that it now points to a file called story. Be aware that before the echo command is executed, ["BASH"] first checks to see whether that file story actually exists. If it doesn't, it is created as an empty file, so that the FD can be pointed to it. This behaviour can be toggled with Shell Options (see later).

We then use the application cat to print out the contents of that file. cat is an application that reads the contents of all the files you pass it as arguments. It then outputs each file one after another on stdout. In essence, it concatenates the contents of all the files you pass it as arguments.

Warning: Far too many code examples and shell tutorials on the Internet tell you to use cat whenever you need to read the contents of a file. This is highly ill-adviced! cat only serves well to contatenate contents of multiple files together, or as a quick tool on the shell prompt to see what's inside a file. You should NOT use cat to read from files in your scripts. There will almost always be far better ways to do this. Please keep this warning in mind. Useless usage of cat will merely result in an extra process to create, and often results in poorer read speed because cat cannot determine the context of what it's reading and the purpose for that data.

When we use cat without passing any kind of arguments, it obviously doesn't know what files to read the content for. In this case, cat will just read from stdin instead of from a file (much like read). Since stdin is normally not a regular file, starting cat without any arguments will seem to do nothing: 

    $ cat

It doesn't even give you back your shell prompt! What's going on? cat is still reading from stdin, which is your keyboard. Anything you type now will be sent to cat. As soon as you hit the Enter key, cat will do what it normally does; it will display what it reads on stdout, just the same way as when it displayed our story on stdout: 

    $ cat
    test?
    test?

Why does it say test? twice now? Well, as you type, your terminal shows you all the characters that you send to stdin before sending them there. That results in the first test? that you see. As soon as you hit Enter, cat has read a line from stdin, and shows it on stdout, which is also your terminal; hence, resulting in the second line: test?. You can press Ctrl+D to send cat the End of File character. That'll cause cat to think the file stdin has closed. It will stop reading from it and return you to your prompt. Let's use file redirection to attach a file to stdin, so that stdin is no longer reading from our keyboard, but instead, now reads from the file: 

    $ cat < story
    The story of William Tell.
    
    It was a cold december night.  Too cold to write.

The result of this is exactly the same as the result from our previous cat story; except this time, the way it works is a little different. In our first example, cat opened an FD to the file story and read its contents through that FD. In this recent example, cat simply reads from stdin, just like it did when it was reading from our keyboard. However, this time, the < story operation has modified stdin so that its data source is the file story rather than our keyboard.

Let's summarize:

  • command > file: Send the stdout of command to file.

  • command < file: Use the contents of file when command reads from stdin.

  • command 1> file: Send the stdout of command to file.

  • command <0 file: Use the contents of file when command reads from stdin.

Redirection operators can take a number. That number denotes the FD that it changes. If the number is not present, the > operator uses FD 1 by default, because that is the number for stdout. < uses FD 0 by default, because that is the number for stdin. The number for the stderr FD is 2. So, let's try sending the output of stderr to a file: 

    $ for homedir in /home/*
    > do rm "$homedir/secret"
    > done 2> errors

In this example, we're looping over each file in /home. We then try to delete the file secret in each of them. Some homedirs may not have a secret. As a result, the rm operation will fail and send an error message on stderr.

You may have noticed that our redirection operator isn't on rm, but it's on that done thing. Why is that? Well, this way, the redirection applies to all output to stderr made inside the whole loop.

Let's see what the result of our loop was? 

    $ cat errors
    rm: cannot remove `/home/axxo/secret': No such file or directory
    rm: cannot remove `/home/lhunath/secret': No such file or directory

Two error messages in our error log file. Two people that didn't have a secret file in their home directory.

If you're writing a script, and you expect that running a certain command may fail on occasion, but don't want the script's user to be bothered by the possible error messages that command may produce, you can silence an FD. Silencing it is as easy as normal File Redirection. We're just going to send all output to that FD into the system's black hole: 

    $ for homedir in /home/*
    > do rm "$homedir/secret"
    > done 2> /dev/null

The file /dev/null is always empty, no matter what you write or read from it. As such, when we write our error messages to it, they just disappear. The /dev/null file remains as empty as ever before. That's because it's not a normal file, it's a virtual device.

There is one last thing you should learn about File Redirection. It's interesting that you can make error log files like this to keep your error messages; but as I mentioned before, ["BASH"] makes sure that the file exists before trying to redirect to it. ["BASH"] also makes sure the file is empty before redirecting to it. As a result, each time we run our loop to delete secret files, our log file will be truncated empty before we fill it up again with new error messages. What if we'd like to keep a record of any error messages generated by our loop? What if we don't want that file to be truncated each time we start our loop? The solution is achieved by doubling the redirection operator. > becomes >>. >> will not empty a file, it will just append new data to the end of it! 

    $ for homedir in /home/*
    > do rm "$homedir/secret"
    > done 2>> errors

Hooray!

  • Good Practice: BR It's a good idea to use redirection whenever an application needs file data and is built to read data from stdin. A lot of bad examples on the Internet tell you to pipe (see later) the output of cat into processes; but this is nothing more than a very bad idea.

Anchor(FD_Manipulation)

File Descriptor Manipulation

Now that you know how to manipulate process input and output by sending it to and reading it from files, let's make it a little more interesting still.

It's possible to change the source and desination of FDs to point to or from files, as you know. It's also possible to copy one FD to another. Let's prepare a simple testbed: 

    $ echo "I am a proud sentence." > file

We've made a file called file, and written a proud sentence into it. It's time I introduce a new application to you. Its name is grep, and it's increadibly powerful. grep is that one thing that you need more than anything else in your household. It basically takes a search string as its first argument and one or more files as extra arguments. Just like cat, grep also uses stdin if you don't specify any files as extra arguments. grep reads the files (or stdin if none were provided) and searches for the search string you gave it. Most versions of grep even support a -r switch, which makes it take directories as well as files as extra arguments, and then searches all the files and directories in those directories that you gave it. Here's an example of how grep can work: 

    $ ls house/
    house/drawer  house/closet  house/dustbin  house/sofa
    $ grep -r socks house/
    house/sofa:socks

In this silly example we have a directory called house with several pieces of furniture in it as files. If we're looking for our socks in each of those files, we send grep to search the directory house/. grep will search everything in there, open each file and look through its contents. In our example, grep finds socks in the file house/sofa; presumably tucked away under a pillow. You want a more realistic example? Sure: 

    $ grep "$HOSTNAME" /etc/*
    /etc/hosts:127.0.0.1       localhost Lyndir

Here we instruct grep to search for whatever $HOSTNAME expands to in whatever /etc/* expands to. It finds my hostname, which is Lyndir in the file /etc/hosts, and shows me the line in that file that contains the search string.

OK, now that you understand grep, let's continue with our File Descriptor Manipulation. Remeber that we created a file called file, and wrote a proud sentence to it? Let's use grep to find where that proud sentence is now: 

    $ grep proud *
    file:I am a proud sentence.

Good! grep found our sentence in file. It writes the result of its operation to stdout which is shown on our terminal. Now let's see if we can make grep send an error message, too: 

    $ grep proud file 'not a file'
    file:I am a proud sentence.
    grep: not a file: No such file or directory

This time, we instruct grep to search for the string proud in the files 'file' and 'not a file'. file exists, and the sentence is in there, so grep happily writes the result to stdout. It moves on to the next file to scan, which is 'not a file'. grep can't open this file to read its content, because it doesn't exist. As a result, grep emits an error message on stderr which is still connected to our terminal.

Now, how would you go about silencing this grep statement completely? We'd like to send all the output that appears on the terminal to a file instead; let's call it proud.log: 

    $ grep proud file 'not a file' > proud.log 2> proud.log

Does that look about right? We first use > to send stdout to proud.log, and then use 2> to send stderr to proud.log as well. Almost, but not quite. If you run this command and then look in proud.log, you'll see there's only an error message, not the output from stdout. We've created a very bad condition here. After stdout has written its output to the log file, the error message needs to be written to the log file. The stderr redirection truncates the log file and writes its own information there. Things would go even more wrong if after that new information arrives on stdout. stdout's write operation might cancel an active write operation from stderr to continue writing its own information.

We need to prevent having two FDs working on the same destination or source. We can do this by duplicating FDs: 

    $ grep proud file 'not a file' > proud.log 2>&1

You need to remember to always read file redirections from left to right. This is the order in which ["BASH"] assigns and processes them. First, stdout is changed so that it points to our proud.log. Then, we use the >& syntax to duplicate FD 1 and put this duplicate in FD 2's stead. If this is hard for you to grasp, you could read this as: stdout becomes proud.log and stderr becomes stdout (which is proud.log). As a result, stdout obviously writes its information to proud.log, but stderr writes its information to whatever stdout was when the >& redirector was used; which was proud.log as well. In this case, the handle that writes to proud.log is the same for both stdout and stderr, and no collisions occur.

Be careful not to confuse the order: 

    $ grep proud file 'not a file' 2>&1 > proud.log

This would read as stderr becomes stdout (which is the terminal), and then stdout becomes proud.log. As a result, stdout's messages will be logged, but the error messages will still go to the terminal. Oops.

Note: BR For compatibility reasons with other shells, ["BASH"] also makes yet another form of redirection available to you. The &> redirection operator is actually just a shorter version of what we did here; redirecting both stdout and stderr to a file:' 

    $ grep proud file 'not a file' &> proud.log

This is the same as > proud.log 2>&1, but not portable to BourneShell. It is not recommended practice.

TODO: Moving FDs and Opening FDs RW.

Anchor(Heredocs_Herestrings)

Heredocs And Herestrings

Files aren't all that. They're boring, really. Strings are so much more interesting. They're not permanent like files on a hard disk, but they're easy to work with, easy to make and easy to manipulate.

Heredocs and Herestrings allow you to perform Redirection as you would with files, just by using strings instead. Let's try it out! 

    $ grep proud <<END
    > I am a proud sentence.
    > END
    I am a proud sentence.

This is a Heredoc (or Here Document). Heredocs aren't really useful unless you're trying to embed long strings of several lines inside your scripts, which is bad practice. You should keep your logic (your code) and your input (your data) separated, preferably in different files.

The way Heredocs work, is by adding the <<STRING operator at the end of a command. That'll instruct that command's stdin that it has to start reading from the script (or the command line, if you're not in a script). The input of the Heredoc stops as soon as you repeat whatever string you added to the end of the <<. In the example above, I used the string END; but it can really be anything (so long as you quote it if it has whitespace).

Beware that all text following the Heredoc operator is sent to the command's stdin literally. That also means any spaces you use for indenting your script. The terminator string (in our case END) must be in the beginning of the line. 

    echo "Let's test abc:"
    if [[ abc = a* ]]; then
        echo <<END
            abc seems to start with an a!
    END
    fi

Will result in: 

    Let's test abc:
            abc seems to start with an a!

You can avoid this by temporarily removing the indentation for the lines of your Heredocs. However, that distorts your pretty and consistent indendation. There is an alternative. If you use <<-END instead of <<END as your Heredoc operator, ["BASH"] removes any tab characters in the beginning of each line of your Heredoc content before sending it to the command. That way you can still use tabs to indent your Heredoc content with the rest of your code. Those tabs will not be sent to the command that receives your Heredoc. This also means you can use tabs to indent your terminator string.

Let's check out the very similar but more interesting Herestrings: 

    $ grep proud <<<"I am a proud sentence"
    I am a proud sentence.

This time, stdin reads its information straight from the string you put after the <<< operator. This is very convenient to send data that's in variables into processes: 

    $ grep proud <<<"$USER sits proudly on his throne in $HOSTNAME."
    lhunath sits proudly on his throne in Lyndir.

Herestrings are shorter, less intrusive and overall more convenient than their bulky Heredoc counterpart.

Later on, you will learn about pipes and how they can be used to send the output of a command into another command's stdin. Many people use pipes to send the output of a variable as stdin into a command. However, for this purpose, Herestrings should be preferred. They do not create a subshell and are lighter both to the shell and to the style of your shell script: 

    $ echo 'Wrap this silly sentence.' | fmt -t -w 20
    Wrap this silly
       sentence.
    $ fmt -t -w 20 <<< 'Wrap this silly sentence.'
    Wrap this silly
       sentence.

  • Good Practice: BR Long heredocs are usually a bad idea because scripts should contain logic, not data. If you have a large document that your script needs, you should ship it in a separate file along with your script. Herestrings, however, come in handy quite often, especially for sending variable content to processes like grep or sed instead of files.

Anchor(Pipes)

Pipes

Now that you can effortlessly manipulate File Descriptors to direct certain types of output to certain files, it's time you learn some more ingenious tricks available through I/O redirection.

You can use File Redirection to write output to files or read input from files. But what if you want to connect the output of one application directly to the input of another? That way, you could build a sort of chain to process output. If you already know about FIFOs, you could use something like this to that end: 

    $ ls
    $ mkfifo myfifo; ls
    myfifo
    $ grep bea myfifo &
    [1] 32635
    $ echo "rat
    > cow
    > deer
    > bear
    > snake" > myfifo
    bear

We use the mkfifo command to create a new file in the current directory named 'myfifo'. This is no ordinary file, however, but a FIFO. FIFOs are files that serve data on a First In, First Out-basis. When you read from a FIFO, you will only receive data as soon as another process writes to it. As such, a FIFO never really contains any data. So long as no process writes data to a file that can be read, any read operation on the FIFO will block as it waits for data to become available. The same works for writes to the file. They will block until another process reads from the FIFO.

In our example, the FIFO called myfifo is read from by grep. grep waits for data to become available on the FIFO. That's why we append the grep command with the & operator, which puts it in the background. That way, we can continue typing and executing commands while grep runs and waits for data. Our echo statement feeds data to the FIFO. As soon as this data becomes available, the running grep command reads it in and processes it. The result is displayed. We have successfully sent data from the echo command to the grep command.

But these temporary files are a real annoyance. You may not have write permissions. You need to remember to clean up any temporary files you create. You need to make sure that data is going in and out, or the FIFO might just end up blocking for no reason.

For these reasons, another feature is made available. This feature is called Pipes. It basically just connects the stdout of one process to the stdin of another; effectively piping the data from one process into another. Let's try our above example again, but using pipes: 

    $ echo "rat
    > cow
    > deer
    > bear
    > snake" | grep bea myfifo
    bear

The pipe is created using the | operator inbetween two commands that are connected with the pipe. The former command's stdout is connected to the latter command's stdin. As a result, grep can read echo's output and display the result of it's operation, which is bear.

Pipes are widely used as a means of postprocessing application output. FIFOs are, in fact, also referred to as named pipes. They accomplish the same results as the pipe operator, but through a filename.

Note: BR The pipe operator creates a subshell environment to run the second process in. This is important to know because any variables that you modify or initialize inside the second command will appear unmodified outside of it. Let's illustrate: 

    $ message=Test
    $ echo "Salut, le monde!" | { read message; echo "The message is: $message"; }
    The message is: Salut, le monde!
    $ echo "The message is: $message"
    The message is: Test

Once the piped command ends, so does the subshell that was created for it. Along with that subshell, any modifications made in that subshell are lost. So be careful!

  • Good Practice: BR Pipes are a very attractive means of post-processing application output. You should, however, be careful not to over-use pipes. If you end up making a pipe-chain that consists of three or more applications, it is time to ask yourself whether you're doing things a smart way. You might be able to use more application features of one of the post-processing applications you've used earlier in the pipe. Each new element in a pipe chain causes a new subshell and a new application to be loaded. It also makes it very hard to follow the logic in your script!

Anchor(Miscellaneous_Operators)

Miscellaneous Operators (stub)

Anchor(Structural_Constructs)

Structural Constructs (stub)

Anchor(Compound_Commands)

Compound Commands (stub)

Anchor(Subshells)

Subshells (stub)

Anchor(Functions_Aliasses)

Functions and Aliasses (stub)

Anchor(Sourcing)

Sourcing (stub)

Anchor(Practices)

Practices

Anchor(Choose_Your_Shell)

Choose Your Shell

The first thing you should do before starting a shell script is enumerate the requirements and the goal of that script.

Pick the right tool for the job. ["BASH"] may be easy to learn and write, but it isn't always fitted to do the work for you.

There are a lot of tools in the basic toolset made available in most *NIX flavors that can help you. If you need only use AWK, then don't make a ["BASH"] script that invokes AWK, just make an AWK script. If you need to retrieve data from an HTML or XML file, ["BASH"] is also the wrong tool for the job. You should considder XSLT instead, or a language that has a library available for parsing XML or HTML.

If you decide to use ["BASH"], then ask yourself these questions first:

  • Does your script need to run in environments where it's possible ["BASH"] is not available?

    • Then choose Sh instead! (Keep in mind that this guide does not apply to Sh!)

  • Are you certain about the version of ["BASH"] that will be available in all environments that your script will run in?

    • If not, you should limit yourself to features of ["BASH"] 2 ONLY.

If the above questions do not limit your choices, then use ["BASH"] 3. Keep these points in mind:

  • Do not inherit ugly and evil shell scripting techniques from retarded Sh scripting guides and examples on the net; ["BASH"] 3 often offers far better alternatives!

  • Do not use a #!/bin/sh header in your script. Be honest and use #!/bin/bash instead. Otherwise you disable all ["BASH"] specific features that are not available in Sh.

  • Forget [ for once and for all. ["BASH"] features an alternative that's far better for many of reasons. It's called [[. Using [ will only cause headaches and break your script when you least expect it.

  • It's also time you forgot about `. It isn't consistent with the syntax of Expansion and is terribly hard to nest without a dose of painkillers. Use $() instead.

  • And for heaven's sake, quotes, quotes, quotes and more quotes! Protect your strings from Word Splitting. Word splitting will eat your babies if you don't quote them properly.

Anchor(Quoting)

Quoting

Word Splitting is the demon inside ["BASH"] that is out to get unsuspecting newcomers or any other scripters off guard.

If you do not understand how Word Splitting works or when it is aplied you should be very careful with your strings and your Parameter Expansions. I suggest you read up on Word Splitting if you doubt your knowledge.

The best way to protect yourself from this beast is to quote all your strings. Quotes keep your strings in one piece and prevent Word Splitting from tearing them open. Allow me to illustrate: 

    $ echo Push that word             away from me.
    Push that word away from me.
    $ echo "Push that word             away from me."
    Push that word             away from me.

Now, don't think Word Splitting is about collapsing spaces. What really happened in this example is that the first command passed each word in our sentence as a separate argument to echo. ["BASH"] split our sentence up in words using the whitespace inbetween them to determine where each argument begins and ends. In the second example ["BASH"] is forced to keep the whole quoted string together. This means it's not split up into arguments and the whole string is passed to echo as the first argument. echo prints out each argument it gets with a space inbetween them. You should understand the basics of Word Splitting now.

This is where it gets dangerous! Word Splitting does not just happen on literal strings, it also happens after Parameter Expansion! As a result, on a dull and tired day, you might just be stupid enough to make this mistake: 

    $ sentence="Push that word             away from me."
    $ echo $sentence
    Push that word away from me.
    $ echo "$sentence"
    Push that word             away from me.

As you can see, in the first echo command, we were neglectant and left out the quotes. That was a mistake. ["BASH"] expanded our sentence and then used Word Splitting to split the resulting expansion up into arguments to use for echo. In our second example, the quotes around the Parameter Expansion of sentence make sure ["BASH"] does not split it up into multiple arguments around the whitespace.

It's not just spaces you need to protect. Word Splitting occurs on spaces, tabs and newlines. In certain context it aplies to the characters in the IFS variable. Here's another example to show you just how badly you can break things if you neglect to use quotes: 

    $ echo "$(ls -al)"
    total 8
    drwxr-xr-x   4 lhunath users 1 2007-06-28 13:13 "."/
    drwxr-xr-x 102 lhunath users 9 2007-06-28 13:13 ".."/
    -rw-r--r--   1 lhunath users 0 2007-06-28 13:13 "a"
    -rw-r--r--   1 lhunath users 0 2007-06-28 13:13 "b"
    -rw-r--r--   1 lhunath users 0 2007-06-28 13:13 "c"
    drwxr-xr-x   2 lhunath users 1 2007-06-28 13:13 "d"/
    drwxr-xr-x   2 lhunath users 1 2007-06-28 13:13 "e"/
    $ echo $(ls -al)
    total 8 drwxr-xr-x 4 lhunath users 1 2007-06-28 13:13 "."/ drwxr-xr-x 102 lhunath users 9 2007-06-28 13:13 ".."/ -rw-r--r-- 1 lhunath users 0 2007-06-28 13:13 "a" -rw-r--r-- 1 lhunath users 0 2007-06-28 13:13 "b" -rw-r--r-- 1 lhunath users 0 2007-06-28 13:13 "c" drwxr-xr-x 2 lhunath users 1 2007-06-28 13:13 "d"/ drwxr-xr-x 2 lhunath users 1 2007-06-28 13:13 "e"/

In some very rare occasions it may be desired to leave out the quotes. That's if you need Word Splitting to take place: 

    $ friends="Marcus JJ Thomas Michelangelo"
    $ for friend in $friends
    > do echo "$friend is my friend!"; done
    Marcus is my friend!
    JJ is my friend!
    Thomas is my friend!
    Michelangelo is my friend!

But honestly? You should use arrays for nearly all of these cases. Arrays have the benefit that they separate strings without the need for an explicit delimitor. That means your strings in the array can contain any valid character, without the worry that it might be your string delimitor (like the space is in our example above). Using arrays in our example above gives us the ability to add middle or last names of our friends: 

    $ friends=( "Marcus The Rich" "JJ The Short" "Timid Thomas" "Michelangelo The Mobster" )
    $ for friend in "${friends[@]}"
    > do echo "$friend is my friend!"; done

Note that in our previous for we used an unquoted $friends. This allowed ["BASH"] to split our friends string up into words. In this last example, we quoted the ${friends[@]} Parameter Expansion. Quoting an expansion of an array through the @ index makes ["BASH"] expand that array into a sequence of its elements, where each element is wrapped into quotes.

Anchor(Readability)

Readability

Almost just as important as the result of your code is the readability of your code.

Chances are that you aren't just going to write this script once and then forget about it. If so, you might as well delete it after using it. If you plan to continue using it, you should also plan to continue maintaining it. Unlike your room your code won't get dirty over time, but you will learn new techniques and new approaches constantly. You will also gain experience about how your script is used. All that new information you gather since the completion of your initial codebase should be used to maintain your code in such a way that it constantly improves. Your code should keep growing more userfriendly and more stable.

  • Trust me when I say, no piece of code is ever 100% ready; with exception to some very short and useless chucks of nothingness.

To make it easier for yourself to keep your code healthy and improve it regularly you should keep an eye on the readability of what you write. When you return to a long loop after a year has passed since your last visit to it and you wish to improve it, add a feature, or debug something about it, believe me when I say you'd rather see this: 

    friends=( "Marcus The Rich" "JJ The Short" "Timid Thomas" "Michelangelo The Mobster" )

    # Say something significant about my friends.
    for name in "${friends[@]}"; do

        # My first friend (in the list).
        if [[ $name = ${friends[0]} ]]; then
            echo $name was my first friend.

        # My friends those names start with M.
        elif [[ $name = M* ]]; then
            echo "$name starts with an M"

        # My short friends.
        elif [[ " $name " = *" Short "* ]]; then
            echo "$name is a shorty."

        # Friends I kind of didn't bother to remember.
        else
            echo "I kind of forgot what $name is like."

        fi

    done

Than being confronted with something like this: 

    x=(       Marcus\ The\ Rich JJ\ The\ Short
      Timid\ Thomas Michelangelo\ The\ Mobster)
    for name in "${x[@]}"
      do if [ "$name" = "$x" ]; then echo $name was my first friend.
     elif
       echo $name    |   \
      grep -qw Short
        then echo $name is a shorty.
     elif [ "x${name:0:1}" = "xM" ]
         then echo $name starts   with an M; else
    echo I kind of forgot what $name \
     is like.; fi; done

And yes, I know this is an exagerated example, but I've seen some authentic code that actually has a lot in common with that last example.

For your own health, keep these few points in mind:

  • Healthy whitespace gives you breathing space. Indent your code properly and consistently. Use blank lines to separate paragraphs or logic blocks.

  • Avoid backslash-escaping. It's counter-intuitive and boggles the mind when overused. Even in small examples it takes your mind more effort to understand a\ b\ c than it takes to understand 'a b c'.

  • Comment your way of thinking before you forget. You might find that even code that looks totally common sense right now could become subject of "What the hell was I thinking when I wrote this?" or "What is this supposed to do?".

  • Consistency prevents mind boggles. Be consistent in your naming style. Be consistent in your use of capitals. Be consistent in your use of shell features. No matter what your girlfriend says, it's good to be predictable and transparant.

Anchor(Debugging)

Debugging

Very often you will find yourself clueless as to why your script isn't acting the way you want it to. Resolving this problem is always just a matter of common sense and debugging techniques.

BR

Diagnose The Problem

Unless you know what exactly the problem is, you most likely won't come up with a solution anytime soon. So make sure you understand what exactly goes wrong. Evaluate the symptoms and/or error messages.

If you must, try and formulate the problem as a sentence. This will also be vital if you're going to ask for help with other people about your problem. You don't want them to rewrite your whole script. You also don't want them to have to go through your whole script or run it so that they understand what's going on. No; you need to make the problem perfectly clear to yourself and to anybody trying to help you. This requirement stands until the day the human race inventes means of telepathy.

BR

Minimize The Codebase

If staring at your code doesn't give you a devine intervention, the next thing you should do is try to minimize your codebase while maintaining the same problem.

Don't worry about preserving the functionality of your script. The only thing you want to preserve is the logic of the code block that seems buggy.

Often, the best way to do this is by copying your script to a new file and start deleting everything that seems irrelevant from it. Alternatively, you can make a new script that does something similar in the same code fashion.

As soon as you delete something that makes the problem go away, you'll have isolated the problem. If not, at least you're not staring at a massive script anymore, but hopefully at a stub of no more than 5-7 lines.

For example; if you have a script that lets you browse images in your image folder by date, and for some reason you can't manage to iterate over your images in the folder properly, it suffices to reduce the script to this part in it: 

    for image in $(ls -R "$imgFolder"); do
        echo "$image"
    done

Your actual script will be far more complex, and the inside of the for loop will also be far longer. But the essence of the problem is this code. Once you've reduced your problem to this it may be easier to see the problem you're facing. Your echo spits out parts of image names; it looks like all whitespace is replaced by newlines. That must be because echo is ran for each chunk terminated by whitespace, not for every image name (as a result, it seems the output has split open image names with whitespace in them). With this reduced code; it's easier to see that the cause is actually your for statement that splits up the output of ls into words. That's because ls is UNPARSABLE in a bugless manner (do not ever use ls in scripts, unless if you want to show its output to a user).

The fix would be: 

    find "$imgFolder" -print0 | while read -d$'\0' image; do
        echo "$image"
    done

Now that you've fixed the problem in this tiny example, it's easy to merge it back into the original script.

BR

Activate ["BASH"]'s Debug Mode

If you still don't see the error of your ways, ["BASH"]'s debugging mode might help you see the problem through the code.

When ["BASH"] runs with the x option turned on, it prints out every command it executes before executing it. This is, after any expansions have been applied. As a result, you can see exactly what's happening as each line in your code is executed. Pay very close attention to the quoting used. ["BASH"] uses quotes to show you exactly which strings are passed as a single argument.

There are three ways of turning on this mode.

  • Run the script with bash -x: 

          $ bash -x ./mybrokenscript
  • Modify your script's header: 
          #! /bin/bash -x

      [.. script ..]

  • Or add set -x somewhere in your code to turn on this mode for only a specific block of your code: 

          #! /bin/bash

      [..irrelevant script code..]

      set -x
      [..relevant script code..]
      set +x

      [..irrelevant script code..]

BR

Reread The Manual

If your script still doesn't seem to agree with you, maybe your perception of the way things work is wrong. Try going back to the manual (or this guide) to re-evaluate whether commands do exactly what you think they do, or the syntax is what you think it is. Very often people misunderstand what for does, how Word Splitting works, or how often they should use quotes.

Keep the tips and good practice guidelines in this guide in mind as well. They often help you avoid bugs and problems with scripts.

I mentioned this in the Scripts section of this guide too, but it's worth repeating it here. First of all, make sure your script's header is actually #! /bin/bash. If it is missing or if it's something like #! /bin/sh then you deserve the problems you're having. That means you're probably not even using ["BASH"] to run your code. Obviously that'll cause issues. Also, make sure you have no Carriage Return characters at the ends of your lines. This is the cause of scripts written in Microsoft Windows(tm). You can get rid of these fairly easily like this: 

    $ tr -d '\r' < myscript > tmp && mv tmp myscript

BR

Read the FAQ / Pitfalls

The ["BashFAQ"] and ["BashPitfalls"] pages explain common misconceptions and issues encountered by other ["BASH"] scripters. It's very likely that your problem will be described there in some shape or form.

To be able to find your problem in there, you'll obviously need to have Diagnosed it properly. You'll need to know what you're looking for.

BR

Ask Us On IRC

There are people in the #bash channel almost 24/7. This channel resides on the freenode IRC network. To reach us, you need an IRC client. Connect it to irc.freenode.net, and /join #bash.

Make sure that you know what your real problem is and know how to explain it well. We don't like having to guess at things. Perhaps it might help us if you explained what you're trying to do with your script.

Either way, please have a look at this page before entering #bash: ["XyProblem"].

BashGuide (last edited 2021-05-27 20:29:49 by GreyCat)