4627
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
|
4327
remove irrelevant preface, some small clean-up, mention associative arrays at the end (but no time to write up an example right now)
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 4: | Line 4: |
It is a well-known and widely accepted principle that self-modifying code is dangerous, and should never be done. Many years ago, when computers had fewer resources and code had to be more compact, very bright individuals would often use self modifying code to create elegant, if somewhat bizarre, solutions to the problem of creating programs to fit in very small spaces. We no longer have that issue. Computers today have, in most cases, abundant resources. However there are always circumstances beyond our control that drive us to do things that we would never choose to do on our own. This FAQ entry describes one of those situations. |
There are always circumstances beyond our control that drive us to do things that we would never choose to do on our own. This FAQ entry describes one of those situations. |
Line 14: | Line 8: |
Now of course we know you would never write a CGI script in Bash. So for the purposes of this entry we will assume that terrorists have kidnapped your wife and children and will torture, maim, kill, "or worse" them if you do not comply with their demands to write such a script. | Now of course we know you would never write a CGI script in Bash. So for the purposes of this entry we will assume that terrorists have kidnapped your spouse and children and will torture, maim, kill, "or worse" them if you do not comply with their demands to write such a script. |
Line 20: | Line 14: |
The quick, easy and dangerous way to process the `QUERY_STRING` is to convert the `&`s to `;`s and then use the `eval` command to run those assignments. However, as we all know the use of `eval` is [[BashFAQ/048|STRONGLY DISCOURAGED]]. That is to say we always avoid using `eval` if there is any way around it. | The quick, easy and dangerous way to process the `QUERY_STRING` is to convert the `&`s to `;`s and then use the `eval` command to run those assignments. However, the use of `eval` is [[BashFAQ/048|STRONGLY DISCOURAGED]]. That is to say we always avoid using `eval` if there is any way around it. |
Line 41: | Line 35: |
=== The SAFE Way === | === A Safer Way === |
Line 43: | Line 37: |
Instead of telling the shell to execute whatever code the user provided in the parameters, a better approach is to extract each variable/value pair, and assign the variables one by one without executing them. This requires an [[BashFAQ/006|indirect variable assignment]], which means using some shell-specific trickery. We'll write this using Bash syntax; converting to ksh or Bourne shell is left as an exercise. | Instead of telling the shell to execute whatever code the user provided in the parameters, a better approach is to extract each variable/value pair, and assign them to shell variables, one by one, without executing them. This requires an [[BashFAQ/006|indirect variable assignment]], which means using some shell-specific trickery. We'll write this using Bash syntax; converting to ksh or Bourne shell is left as an exercise. |
Line 59: | Line 53: |
IFS='&' | IFS='&'; set -f |
Line 91: | Line 85: |
While this might be a little less clear, it avoids this huge security problem that `eval` has: executing any arbitrary command the user might care to enter into the web form. Clearly it's more desirable to do it this way. | While this might be a little less clear, it avoids this huge security problem that `eval` has: executing any arbitrary command the user might care to enter into the web form. Clearly this is an improvement. An even better approach might be to place the key/value pairs into an associative array. Associative arrays are available in ksh93 and in bash 4.0, but not in POSIX or Bourne shells. |
How do I write a CGI script that accepts parameters?
There are always circumstances beyond our control that drive us to do things that we would never choose to do on our own. This FAQ entry describes one of those situations.
A CGI program can be invoked with parameters, sent by the web browser (user agent). There are (at least) two ways to invoke a CGI program: the "GET" method and the "POST" method. In the "GET" method, parameters are provided to the CGI program in an environment variable called QUERY_STRING. The parameters take the form of KEY=VALUE definitions (e.g. user=george), with some characters encoded in hexadecimal, spaces encoded as plus signs, all joined together with ampersands. In the "POST" method, the parameters are provided on standard input instead.
Now of course we know you would never write a CGI script in Bash. So for the purposes of this entry we will assume that terrorists have kidnapped your spouse and children and will torture, maim, kill, "or worse" them if you do not comply with their demands to write such a script.
(The "or worse" situation would clearly be something like being forced to use Microsoft based software.)
So, given a QUERY_STRING variable, we would like to extract the keys (variables) and their values, so that we can use them in the script.
The quick, easy and dangerous way to process the QUERY_STRING is to convert the &s to ;s and then use the eval command to run those assignments. However, the use of eval is STRONGLY DISCOURAGED. That is to say we always avoid using eval if there is any way around it.
The Dangerous Way
# Read in the cgi input string if [ "$QUERY_STRING" ]; then foo=$QUERY_STRING else read foo fi # Convert some of the encoded strings and things like "&" (left as an exercise for the reader) # Run eval on the string eval $foo # Sit back and discover that the user has put "/bin/rm -rf /" in one of the web form fields, # which even if not root will do damage to some part of the file system. # Another dangerous string would be a fork bomb.
A Safer Way
Instead of telling the shell to execute whatever code the user provided in the parameters, a better approach is to extract each variable/value pair, and assign them to shell variables, one by one, without executing them. This requires an indirect variable assignment, which means using some shell-specific trickery. We'll write this using Bash syntax; converting to ksh or Bourne shell is left as an exercise.
# Bash # Read in the cgi input string if [ "$QUERY_STRING" ]; then foo=$QUERY_STRING else read foo fi # foo contains something like name=Fred+Flintstone&city=Bedrock # Treat this as a list of key=value expressions joined with &. # Iterate through the list and perform each assignment. IFS='&'; set -f for i in $foo; do declare "$i" done unset IFS # Each CGI parameter will now be in a shell variable of the same name. # You'd better know what the names are, because we didn't keep track. # Each variable is still "urlencoded". Spaces are encoded as + and # various things are encoded as %xx where xx is hexadecimal. # Suppose we want to use a parameter named "name". # First, decode the spaces. name=${name//+/ } # Now decode the %xx characters. We use another trick to do this. # First, we replace all % signs with \x # Second, we use echo -e to cause all the \xxx to be evaluated. name=${name//\%/\\x} name=$(echo -e "$name") # We did not do this BEFORE the iteration/assignment loop because if we had, # then a parameter that contains an encoded & (or whatever malicious character) # would have caused much grief. We have to do it here. # Now you do whatever you wanted to do with "name".
While this might be a little less clear, it avoids this huge security problem that eval has: executing any arbitrary command the user might care to enter into the web form. Clearly this is an improvement.
An even better approach might be to place the key/value pairs into an associative array. Associative arrays are available in ksh93 and in bash 4.0, but not in POSIX or Bourne shells.