Differences between revisions 13 and 14
Revision 13 as of 2010-04-07 19:41:53
Size: 2856
Editor: GreyCat
Comment: GNU coreutils, not Linux
Revision 14 as of 2010-04-07 20:02:52
Size: 3299
Editor: GreyCat
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 6: Line 6:
and at least possible (though potentially painful) on anything else. and at least possible (though potentially painful) on anything else.  GNU coreutils also added an implementation of `timeout` in 2008 (version number unknown).
Line 17: Line 17:

The primary difference between `doalarm` and `timeout` is that `doalarm` "execs" the program after setting up the alarm, which makes it wonderful in a WrapperScript; while `timeout` launches the program as a child and then hangs around (both processes exist simultaneously), which gives it the opportunity to send more than one signal if necessary.

How do I run a command, and have it abort (timeout) after N seconds?

There are two C programs that can do this: doalarm, and timeout. Compiling them is beyond the scope of this document, but it should be trivial on GNU/Linux systems, easy on most BSDs, and at least possible (though potentially painful) on anything else. GNU coreutils also added an implementation of timeout in 2008 (version number unknown).

In early 2010, a patch was submitted to add a proper "--kill-after" option to the "timeout" command in GNU coreutils. If you have the GNU coreutils version of timeout (as opposed to the downloaded & compiled "timeout" program mentioned above), and if your version is new enough to support the "--kill-after" option, then the coreutils approach is almost certainly your best bet.

The primary difference between doalarm and timeout is that doalarm "execs" the program after setting up the alarm, which makes it wonderful in a WrapperScript; while timeout launches the program as a child and then hangs around (both processes exist simultaneously), which gives it the opportunity to send more than one signal if necessary.

If you don't have or don't want one of the above programs, you can use a perl one-liner to set an ALRM and then exec the program you want to run under a time limit. In any case, you must understand what your program does with SIGALRM; programs with periodic updates usually use ALRM for that purpose and update rather than dying when they receive that signal.

doalarm() { perl -e 'alarm shift; exec @ARGV' "$@"; }

doalarm ${NUMBER_OF_SECONDS_BEFORE_ALRMING} program arg arg ...

If you can't or won't install one of these programs (which really should have been included with the basic core Unix utilities 30 years ago!), then the best you can do is an ugly hack like:

   command & pid=$!
   { sleep 10; kill $pid; } &

This will, as you will soon discover, produce quite a mess regardless of whether the timeout condition kicked in or not, if it's run in an interactive shell. Cleaning it up is not something worth my time. Also, it can't be used with any command that requires a foreground terminal, like top.

It is possible to do something similar, but to keep command in the foreground:

   bash -c '(sleep 10; kill $$) & exec command'

kill $$ would kill the shell, except that exec causes the command to take over the shell's PID. It is necessary to use bash -c so that the calling shell isn't replaced; in bash 4, it is possible to use a subshell instead:

   ( cmdpid=$BASHPID; (sleep 10; kill $cmdpid) & exec command )

The shell-script "timeout" uses the second approach above. It has the advantage of working immediately (no need for compiling a program), but has problems e.g. with programs reading standard input.

Just use doalarm or timeout instead. Really.

BashFAQ/068 (last edited 2019-07-25 13:38:08 by GreyCat)