Size: 1160
Comment: link to #50
|
Size: 1359
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 30: | Line 30: |
The regexp works as long as it is quoted with bash version ''3.00.15(1)-release'' on CentOS4/RHEL4. I didn't bother checking whether bash is a patched version or not in CentOS4/RHEL4. --ellingsw |
I want to check if [[ $var == foo || $var == bar || $var == more ]] without repeating $var n times.
Here's a portable solution:
case $var in foo|bar|more) ... ;; esac
And here's one that uses =~ (which requires bash 3.0 or higher):
regex='^(foo|bar|more)$' if [[ $var =~ $regex ]]; then ... fi
This one only works in bash 3.1 and some 3.2 revisions (it is untested in 3.0):
if [[ $var =~ '^(foo|bar|more)$' ]]; then ... fi
The =~ operator behavior changes drastically between 3.1 and 3.2, so be careful with it. The above expression is tested to work in bash 3.1 and 3.2.{13,15,17}; and it doesn't work in 3.2.0. Please also note that the regexp does not need to be quoted in the 3.2 revisions where it works. --["redondos"]
Normally I would never advocate [:BashFAQ/050:sticking code into a variable] and attempting to use it -- lots of people have enormous trouble because they try to do that. In the case of =~, though, it seems to be required. Personally, I'd just stick with the case. --GreyCat
The regexp works as long as it is quoted with bash version 3.00.15(1)-release on CentOS4/RHEL4. I didn't bother checking whether bash is a patched version or not in CentOS4/RHEL4. --ellingsw