[Show "Revision History"] [Show "General Page Infos"] [Show "Page hits and edits"]

Revision History

Showing page edit history entries from 15 to 39 out of 54 entries total. (5 | 10 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 200 items per page)

# Date Size Editor Comment Action
39 2015-01-11 22:54:10 3513 to previous 112   view
38 2014-05-04 22:03:53 3515 to previous ormaaj oops view
37 2014-05-04 22:01:39 3453 to previous ormaaj Adding the case of a bare +/- or empty doesn't complicate things much (I think). Needs testing. view
36 2014-05-02 14:28:21 3574 to previous ormaaj Fix some bugs. ksh has always supported [[. rm'd example. =~ shouldn't be shunned due to bash 3's bad implementation. rm'd (again). =~ (and [[) will quite likely be POSIX at some point. view
35 2014-05-02 13:25:28 4036 to previous ormaaj POSIX doesn't require %f. Some shells printf(1) (ksh/zsh) evaluate arithmetic. Unlike C varargs functions (like printf), they may perform implicit conversion to float successfully. view
34 2013-08-17 22:52:06 3995 to previous 187 Remove crappy (("$foo")) suggestion. See: http://sprunge.us/BThD view
33 2012-12-02 11:27:59 4276 to previous geirha toc broken again view
32 2012-12-02 02:34:38 4278 to previous S01060048548a70fe   view
31 2012-10-24 17:34:14 4015 to previous ormaaj rm the entire "declare -i" section with dangerous examples. declare -i is NOT a method of testing for valid integers. It requires extra care - not recommended for beginners. view
30 2012-05-11 20:51:25 5804 to previous e36freak typo correction, incorrect variable name view
29 2012-04-04 22:41:19 5801 to previous GreyCat "Using eq" was already in the page. Add that phrase to the section header for emphasis. view
28 2012-04-04 12:28:37 5955 to previous GrzegorzRumatowski eq method added view
27 2012-04-04 11:51:59 5785 to previous Lhunath The eq operator is covered by the [ and printf section. view
26 2012-04-04 11:48:57 5846 to previous oberon-i eq method added view
25 2011-10-04 06:59:36 5785 to previous dialup-4 one RE does it all view
24 2011-06-29 14:24:47 6034 to previous irc2samus if you're validating it's more natural to have the desired outcome on the "true" part of the if block view
23 2011-04-11 21:16:06 6033 to previous 109   view
22 2010-02-24 14:48:18 6033 to previous kurkale6ka The second star IS actually needed, otherwise a pattern like test1234 would fail view
21 2010-02-24 14:07:50 6029 to previous webgw1 The second star isn't needed view
20 2010-02-24 14:03:45 6032 to previous webgw1 The second star isn't needed view
19 2010-01-15 23:59:45 6033 to previous GreyCat restore some deleted content; clean up the previous "clean-up" view
18 2010-01-15 20:30:25 5228 to previous ppp089210037022 a bit of clean, add the solutions using [ and printf view
17 2008-11-22 21:55:28 6058 to previous GreyCat first-line view
16 2008-11-22 14:08:29 6060 to previous localhost converted to 1.6 markup view
15 2008-06-14 01:39:12 6054 to previous GreyCat   view