7145
Comment: associative arrays, and fix a quoting issue... and quarantine everything that's wrong.
|
2004
Changes. Ignoring 5.2 for now
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
If your real question was ''How do I check whether one of my parameters was -v?'' then please see [[BashFAQ/035|FAQ #35]] instead. Otherwise, read on.... | If your real question is ''How do I check whether one of my parameters was -v?'' then see [[BashFAQ/035|FAQ #35]] instead. Otherwise, read on… |
Line 5: | Line 5: |
First of all, let's get the terminology straight. Bash has no real notion of "lists" or "sets". Bash has strings, [[BashFAQ/005|indexed arrays]], and associative arrays. So, what we're trying to do is not supported by the basic data structures available in the language. The ''best'' choice for this problem is to use an associative array. Checking whether a key is set (or not set) in an associative array is much more efficient than checking whether a key exists as one of the values in an indexed array. === With an associative array === All we need to do is create one entry for each element of the set. Then, when we want to see whether our input is in that set, we just check whether the associative array contains an entry for our input. |
<<TableOfContents>> === Associative arrays === All we need to do is create an entry for each item and look it up by index. In this example, we test whether the user input `x` is a member of the set `a`: |
Line 13: | Line 10: |
# Bash 4 and higher declare -A exists for i in Bigfoot UFOs Republicans; do exists["$i"]=1 |
# Bash etc. function get_input { [[ -t 0 ]] || return printf 'hm? ' IFS= read -r${BASH_VERSION+\e} "$1" } set -- Bigfoot UFOs Republicans typeset -A a for x; do a+=([$x]=) |
Line 19: | Line 24: |
read -r input if [[ ${exists["$input"]} ]]; then printf "%s exist!\\n" "$input" |
get_input x if [[ -v a[$x] ]]; then printf '%s exists!\n' "$x" |
Line 23: | Line 29: |
printf "%s doesn't exist.\\n" "$input" | printf '%s doesn't exist.\n' "$x" |
Line 27: | Line 33: |
=== With an indexed array === '''NOTE:''' In the general case, a string cannot possibly contain a list of other strings because there is no reliable way to tell where each substring begins and ends. We can store a list of strings in the values of an indexed array. Given a traditional array, the only proper way to do this is to loop over all elements in your array and check them for the element you are looking for. Say what we are looking for is in `bar` and our list is in the array `foo`: |
=== Indexed arrays === We can store a list of strings in an indexed array by looping over each element: |
Line 36: | Line 38: |
for element in "${foo[@]}"; do [[ $element = "$bar" ]] && echo "Found $bar." |
typeset -a haystack for x in "${haystack[@]}"; do [[ $x == "$needle" ]] && printf 'Found %q!\n' "$needle" |
Line 41: | Line 45: |
And that's all there is to it. There are no other correct answers. However, that never stopped anyone from contributing their incorrect answers to a wiki, so... ---- /!\ '''Everything below this point is silly and you should not use it.''' === Assorted wrong answers === If you need to perform this several times in your script, you might want to extract the logic into a function: {{{ # Bash isIn() { local pattern="$1" element shift for element do [[ $element = $pattern ]] && return 0 done return 1 } if isIn "jacob" "${names[@]}" then echo "Jacob is on the list." fi }}} Or, if you want your function to return the '''index''' at which the element was found: {{{ # Bash 3.0 or higher indexOf() { local pattern=$1 local index list shift list=("$@") for index in "${!list[@]}" do [[ ${list[index]} = $pattern ]] && { echo $index return 0 } done echo -1 return 1 } if index=$(indexOf "jacob" "${names[@]}") then echo "Jacob is the ${index}th on the list." else echo "Jacob is not on the list." fi }}} If your "list" is contained in a string, and for some half-witted reason you choose not to heed the warnings above, you can use the following code to search through "words" in a string. (The only real excuse for this would be that you're stuck in Bourne shell, which has no arrays.) {{{ # Bourne set -f for element in $foo; do if test x"$element" = x"$bar"; then echo "Found $bar." fi done set +f }}} Here, a "word" is defined as any substring that is delimited by whitespace (or more specifically, the characters currently in IFS). The `set -f` prevents [[glob]] expansion of the words in the list. Turning glob expansions back on (`set +f`) is optional. Here's a hack that you shouldn't use, but which is presented for the sake of completeness: {{{ # Bash if [[ " $foo " = *" $bar "* ]]; then echo "Found $bar." fi }}} (The problem here is that is assumes ''space'' can be used as a delimiter between words. Your elements might contain spaces, which would break this!) That same hack, for Bourne shells: {{{ # Bourne case " $foo " in *" $bar "*) echo "Found $bar.";; esac }}} You can also use extended glob with printf to search for a word in an array. ''I haven't tested it enough, so it might break in some cases --sn18'' {{{ # Bash shopt -s extglob #convert array to glob printf -v glob '%q|' "${array[@]}" glob=${glob%|} [[ $word = @($glob) ]] && echo "Found $word" }}} . ''It will break when an array element contains a | character. Hence, I moved it down here with the other hacks that work in a similar fashion and have a similar limitation.'' -- GreyCat . ''printf %q quotes a | character too, so it probably should not'' --sn18 GNU's grep has a {{{\b}}} feature which allegedly matches the edges of words (word "boundaries"). Using that, one may attempt to replicate the shorter approach used above, but it is fraught with peril: {{{ # Is 'foo' one of the positional parameters? egrep '\bfoo\b' <<<"$@" >/dev/null && echo yes # This is where it fails: is '-v' one of the positional parameters? egrep '\b-v\b' <<<"$@" >/dev/null && echo yes # Unfortunately, \b sees "v" as a separate word. # Nobody knows what the hell it's doing with the "-". # Is "someword" in the array 'array'? egrep '\bsomeword\b' <<<"${array[@]}" # Obviously, you can't use this if someword is '-v'! }}} Since this "feature" of GNU grep is both non-portable and poorly defined, we recommend '''not''' using it. It is simply mentioned here for the sake of completeness. == Bulk comparison == This method tries to compare the desired string to the entire contents of the array. It can potentially be very efficient, but it depends on a delimiter that must not be in the sought value or the array. Here we use $'\a', the BEL character, because it's extremely uncommon. {{{ # usage: if has "element" list of words; then ...; fi has() { local IFS=$'\a' t="$1" shift [[ $'\a'"$*"$'\a' == *$'\a'$t$'\a'* ]] } }}} == Enumerated types == |
=== enum (ksh93) === |
Line 184: | Line 50: |
Line 194: | Line 61: |
$ typeset -a [colors] bar | $ typeset -a '[colors]' bar |
Line 197: | Line 65: |
typeset -a [colors] bar=([blue]=test) | typeset -a '[colors]' bar=([blue]=test) |
Line 202: | Line 70: |
See `src/cmd/ksh93/tests/enum.sh` in the AST source for more examples. |
I want to check to see whether a word is in a list (or an element is a member of a set).
If your real question is How do I check whether one of my parameters was -v? then see FAQ #35 instead. Otherwise, read on…
Contents
Associative arrays
All we need to do is create an entry for each item and look it up by index. In this example, we test whether the user input x is a member of the set a:
# Bash etc. function get_input { [[ -t 0 ]] || return printf 'hm? ' IFS= read -r${BASH_VERSION+\e} "$1" } set -- Bigfoot UFOs Republicans typeset -A a for x; do a+=([$x]=) done get_input x if [[ -v a[$x] ]]; then printf '%s exists!\n' "$x" else printf '%s doesn't exist.\n' "$x" fi
Indexed arrays
We can store a list of strings in an indexed array by looping over each element:
# Bash typeset -a haystack for x in "${haystack[@]}"; do [[ $x == "$needle" ]] && printf 'Found %q!\n' "$needle" done
enum (ksh93)
In ksh93t or later, one may create enum types/variables/constants using the enum builtin. These work similarly to C enums (and the equivalent feature of other languages). These may be used to restrict which values may be assigned to a variable so as to avoid the need for an expensive test each time an array variable is set or referenced. Like types created using typeset -T, the result of an enum command is a new declaration command that can be used to instantiate objects of that type.
# ksh93 $ enum colors=(red green blue) $ colors foo=green $ foo=yellow ksh: foo: invalid value yellow
typeset -a can also be used in combination with an enum type to allow enum constants as subscripts.
# ksh93 $ typeset -a '[colors]' bar $ bar[blue]=test1 $ typeset -p bar typeset -a '[colors]' bar=([blue]=test) $ bar[orange]=test ksh: colors: invalid value orange