Differences between revisions 13 and 119 (spanning 106 versions)
Revision 13 as of 2009-12-09 02:07:13
Size: 5688
Editor: ozgw
Comment:
Revision 119 as of 2024-02-26 07:51:38
Size: 8323
Editor: larryv
Comment: replaced bash-hackers URL with Wayback Machine version
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 2: Line 2:
== How can I handle command-line arguments (options) to my script easily? ==
Well, that depends a great deal on what you want to do with them.  Here's a general template that might help for the simple cases:
== How can I handle command-line options and arguments in my script easily? ==
Well, that depends a great deal on what you want to do with them. There are two standard approaches, each with its strengths and weaknesses.

<<TableO
fContents>>

=== Overview ===
A Unix command generally has an argument syntax like thi
s:
Line 6: Line 11:
# Bash
while [[ $1 == -* ]]; do
    case "$1" in
      -h|--help|-\?) show_help; exit 0;;
      -v|--verbose) verbose=1; shift;;
      -f) if (($# > 1)); then
            output_file=$2; shift 2
          else
            printf "%s\n" "-f requires an argument"
tar -x -f archive.tar -v -- file1 file2 file3
}}}
Please note the conventions and the ordering here, because they are ''important''. They actually matter. This command has some ''arguments'' (file1, file2, file3), and some ''options'' (-x -f archive.tar -v), as well as the traditional ''end of options indicator'' "--".

The options appear ''before'' the non-option arguments. They do not appear afterward. They do not appear at just any old random place in the command.

Some options (-x, -v) are standalones. They are either present, or not. Some options (-f) take an ''argument'' of their own.

In all cases, option processing involves writing a loop. Ideally, this loop will make ''one pass'' over the argument list, examining each argument in turn, and setting appropriate shell variables so that the script remembers which options are in effect. Ultimately, it will ''discard'' all of the options, so that the argument list is left holding only the ''non-option arguments'' (file1 file2 file3). The rest of the script, then, can simply begin processing those, referring as needed to the variables that were set up by the option processor.

The option processor recognizes the end of options when it finds a -- argument, or when it finds an argument that doesn't start with a hyphen. (The ''option argument'' archive.tar does not signal the end of options, because it is processed along with the -f option.)

There are two basic approaches to writing an option processing loop: either write the loop yourself from scratch (we'll call this a "manual loop"), or use the shell's `getopts` command to assist with option splitting. We'll cover both of these cases.

'''Do not use getopt(1). Do not even discuss getopt on this page.''' Go to ComplexOptionParsing to learn more about it.

=== Manual loop ===
Manually parsing options is the most flexible approach. It is the ''best'' way, really, because it allows you to do anything you like: you can handle both single-letter and long options, with or without option arguments. That's why we're showing it first.

If you want to handle GNU-style `--long-options` or Tcl-style `-longopts`, a manual loop is your only choice. `getopts` does not support these.

In this example, notice how both `--file FILE` and `--file=FILE` are handled.

{{{#!highlight bash
#!/bin/sh
# POSIX

die() {
    printf '%s\n' "$1" >&2
    exit 1
}

# Initialize all the option variables.
# This ensures we are not contaminated by variables from the environment.
file=
verbose=0

while :; do
    case $1 in
        -h|-\?|--help)
            show_help # Display a usage synopsis.
            exit
            ;;
        -f|--file) # Takes an option argument; ensure it has been specified.
            if [ "$2" ]; then
                file=$2
                shift
            else
                die 'ERROR: "--file" requires a non-empty option argument.'
            fi
            ;;
        --file=?*)
            file=${1#*=} # Delete everything up to "=" and assign the remainder.
            ;;
        --file=) # Handle the case of an empty --file=
            die 'ERROR: "--file" requires a non-empty option argument.'
            ;;
        -v|--verbose)
            verbose=$((verbose + 1)) # Each -v adds 1 to verbosity.
            ;;
        --) # End of all options.
            shift
            break
            ;;
        -?*)
            printf 'WARN: Unknown option (ignored): %s\n' "$1" >&2
            ;;
        *) # Default case: No more options, so break out of the loop.
            break
    esac

    shift
done

# if --file was provided, open it for writing, else duplicate stdout
if [ "$file" ]; then
    exec 3> "$file"
else
    exec 3>&1
fi

# Rest of the program here.
# If there are input files (for example) that follow the options, they
# will remain in the "$@" positional parameters.
}}}
This parser does not handle single-letter options concatenated together (like `-xvf` being understood as `-x -v -f`). This could be added with effort, but it's left as an exercise for the reader. In practice, it's exceptionally rare for shell scripts that handle long options to handle single-letter option splitting as well. It's simply not worth the effort.

For the most part, shell scripts that you write will not need to worry about single-letter option splitting, because you are the only person using them. Fancy option processing is only desirable if you are releasing the program for general use, and that is almost ''never'' going to be the case in real life. Single-letter option combining also precludes the use of Tcl-style long arguments (`-foo`), which some commands like [[https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/find.html|find(1)]], [[https://linux.die.net/man/1/gcc|gcc(1)]] and [[https://linux.die.net/man/1/star|star(1)]] use.

=== getopts ===
The main benefit of `getopts` is to allow single-letter option splitting (`-xvf` handled as `-x -v -f`). The trade-off for this is that you cannot use long arguments of any kind (GNU-style `--foo` or Tcl-style `-foo`), or options with an optional argument (like `mysql`'s `-p[password]` option).

`getopts` is suitable for simple scripts. The more complex your option parsing needs are, the less likely it is that you'll be able to make use of `getopts`.

Here is a `getopts` example:

{{{#!highlight bash
#!/bin/sh

# Usage info
show_help() {
cat << EOF
Usage: ${0##*/} [-hv] [-f OUTFILE] [FILE]...
Do stuff with FILE and write the result to standard output. With no FILE
or when FILE is -, read standard input.

    -h display this help and exit
    -f OUTFILE write the result to OUTFILE instead of standard output.
    -v verbose mode. Can be used multiple times for increased
                verbosity.
EOF
}

# Initialize our own variables:
output_file=""
verbose=0

OPTIND=1
# Resetting OPTIND is necessary if getopts was used previously in the script.
# It is a good idea to make OPTIND local if you process options in a function.

while getopts hvf: opt; do
    case $opt in
        h)
            show_help
            exit 0
            ;;
        v) verbose=$((verbose+1))
            ;;
        f) output_file=$OPTARG
            ;;
        *)
            show_help >&2
Line 16: Line 145:
          fi ;;
      --) shift; break;;
      -*) echo "invalid option: $1"; show_help; exit 1;;
            ;;
Line 21: Line 148:
shift "$((OPTIND-1))" # Discard the options and sentinel --

# Everything that's left in "$@" is a non-option. In our case, a FILE to process.
printf 'verbose=<%d>\noutput_file=<%s>\nLeftovers:\n' "$verbose" "$output_file"
printf '<%s>\n' "$@"

# End of file
Line 22: Line 156:
Now all of the remaining arguments are the filenames which followed the optional switches. You can process those with `for i` or `"$@"`. There is a [[https://web.archive.org/web/20230324055145/https://wiki.bash-hackers.org/howto/getopts_tutorial|getopts tutorial]] which explains what all of the syntax and variables mean. In bash, there is also `help getopts`.
Line 24: Line 158:
A POSIX version of that same code:
{{{
# POSIX
while true; do
    case "$1" in
      -h|--help|-\?) show_help; exit 0;;
      -v|--verbose) verbose=1; shift;;
      -f) if [ $# -gt 1 ]; then
            output_file=$2; shift 2
          else
            printf "%s\n" "-f requires an argument"
            exit 1
          fi ;;
      --) shift; break;;
      -*) echo "invalid option: $1"; show_help; exit 1;;
      *) break;;
    esac
done
}}}
The advantages of `getopts` over a manual loop:
Line 44: Line 160:
For more complex/generalized cases, or if you want things like "-xvf" to be handled as three separate flags, or if you want to handle [[http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/libc/Argument-Syntax.html|GNU-style long options]], you need a different approach.  1. It can handle things like `-xvf filename` in the expected Unix way, automatically.
 1. It makes sure options are parsed like any standard command (lowest common denominator), avoiding surprises.
 1. With some implementations, the error messages will be localised in the language of the user.
Line 46: Line 164:
'''Never use getopt(1).''' `getopt` cannot handle empty arguments strings, or arguments with embedded whitespace. Please forget that it ever existed. The disadvantages of `getopts`:
Line 48: Line 166:
The POSIX shell (and others) offer `getopts` which is safe to use. Here is a simplistic `getopts` example:  1. (Except for ksh93) it can only handle short options (`-h`, not `--help`).
 1. It cannot handle options with optional arguments like `mysql`'s `-p[password]`.
 1. It doesn't exist in the Bourne shell.
 1. It ''only'' allows options to be parsed in the "standard way" (lowest common denominator).
 1. Options are coded in at least 2, probably 3 places -- in the call to `getopts`, in the case statement that processes them, and in the help/usage message that documents them.
Line 50: Line 172:
{{{
# POSIX
x=1 # Avoids an error if we get no options at all.
while getopts "abcf:g:h:" opt; do
  case "$opt" in
    a) echo "You said a";;
    b) echo "You said b";;
    c) echo "You said c";;
    f) echo "You said f, with argument $OPTARG";;
    g) echo "You said g, with argument $OPTARG";;
    h) echo "You said h, with argument $OPTARG";;
  esac
  x=$OPTIND
done
shift $(($x-1))
echo "Left overs: $@"
}}}
For other, more complicated ways of option parsing, see ComplexOptionParsing.
Line 68: Line 174:
There is still the disadvantage that options are coded in at least 2, probably 3 places - in the call to `getopts`, in the case statement that processes them and presumably in the help message that you are going to get around to writing one of these days. This is a classic opportunity for errors to creep in as the code is written and maintained - often not discovered till much, much later.

Another approach is to check options with `if` statements "on demand". A function like this one may be useful:

{{{
# Bash
HaveOpt() {
  local needle=$1
  shift
  while [[ $1 == -* ]]; do
    case "$1" in
      --) return 1; # by convention, -- is end of options
      $needle) return 0;;
    esac
    shift
  done
  return 1
}
if HaveOpt --quick "$@"; then echo "Option quick is set"; fi
}}}
and it will work if script is run as:

 * YES: ./script --quick
 * YES: ./script -other --quick
but will stop on first argument with no "-" in front (or on --):

 * NO: ./script -bar foo --quick
 * NO: ./script -bar -- --quick
Of course, this approach (iterating over the argument list every time you want to check for one) is far less efficient than just iterating once and setting flag variables. But it does offer a consolidation of the option-handling code into a single place (or two places if you count the help message).

[[http://bhepple.freeshell.org/oddmuse/wiki.cgi/process-getopt|bhepple]] suggests the use of [[http://sourceforge.net/projects/process-getopt/|process-getopt]] (GPL licensed) and offers this example code:

{{{
PROG=$(basename $0)
VERSION='1.2'
USAGE="A tiny example using process-getopt(1)"

# call process-getopt functions to define some options:
source /usr/bin/process-getopt

SLOT=""
SLOT_func() { [ "${1:-""}" ] && SLOT="yes"; } # callback for SLOT option
add_opt SLOT "boolean option" s "" slot

TOKEN=""
TOKEN_func() { [ "${1:-""}" ] && TOKEN="$2"; } # callback for TOKEN option
add_opt TOKEN "this option takes a value" t n token number

add_std_opts # define the standard options --help etc:

TEMP=$(call_getopt "$@") || exit 1
eval set -- "$TEMP" # just as with getopt(1)

# remove the options from the command line
process_opts "$@" || shift "$?"

echo "SLOT=$SLOT"
echo "TOKEN=$TOKEN"
echo "args=$@"
}}}
Here, all information about each option is defined in one place making for much easier authoring and maintenance. A lot of the dirty work is handled automatically and standards are obeyed as in getopt(1) - because it calls getopt for you.
 . ''Actually, what the author forgot to say was that it's actually using `getopts` semantics, rather than `getopt`. I ran this test:''
 {{{
 wooledg@wooledg:~/process-getopt-1.6$ set -- one 'rm -rf /' 'foo;bar' "'"
 wooledg@wooledg:~/process-getopt-1.6$ call_getopt "$@"
  -- 'rm -rf /' 'foo;bar' ''\'''
 }}}
 . ''It appears to be intelligent enough to handle null options, whitespace-containing options, and single-quote-containing options in a manner that makes the [[BashFAQ/048|eval]] not blow up in your face. But this is not an endorsement of the process-getopt software overall; I don't know it well enough. -GreyCat

 . ''It's written and tested on Linux where the getopt(1) is very like `getopts`. In the interests of portability I'll see if `getopts` can be used and update this note when I have some results. -[[http://bhepple.freeshell.org/oddmuse/wiki.cgi/process-getopt|bhepple]]
----
CategoryShell

How can I handle command-line options and arguments in my script easily?

Well, that depends a great deal on what you want to do with them. There are two standard approaches, each with its strengths and weaknesses.

Overview

A Unix command generally has an argument syntax like this:

tar -x -f archive.tar -v -- file1 file2 file3

Please note the conventions and the ordering here, because they are important. They actually matter. This command has some arguments (file1, file2, file3), and some options (-x -f archive.tar -v), as well as the traditional end of options indicator "--".

The options appear before the non-option arguments. They do not appear afterward. They do not appear at just any old random place in the command.

Some options (-x, -v) are standalones. They are either present, or not. Some options (-f) take an argument of their own.

In all cases, option processing involves writing a loop. Ideally, this loop will make one pass over the argument list, examining each argument in turn, and setting appropriate shell variables so that the script remembers which options are in effect. Ultimately, it will discard all of the options, so that the argument list is left holding only the non-option arguments (file1 file2 file3). The rest of the script, then, can simply begin processing those, referring as needed to the variables that were set up by the option processor.

The option processor recognizes the end of options when it finds a -- argument, or when it finds an argument that doesn't start with a hyphen. (The option argument archive.tar does not signal the end of options, because it is processed along with the -f option.)

There are two basic approaches to writing an option processing loop: either write the loop yourself from scratch (we'll call this a "manual loop"), or use the shell's getopts command to assist with option splitting. We'll cover both of these cases.

Do not use getopt(1). Do not even discuss getopt on this page. Go to ComplexOptionParsing to learn more about it.

Manual loop

Manually parsing options is the most flexible approach. It is the best way, really, because it allows you to do anything you like: you can handle both single-letter and long options, with or without option arguments. That's why we're showing it first.

If you want to handle GNU-style --long-options or Tcl-style -longopts, a manual loop is your only choice. getopts does not support these.

In this example, notice how both --file FILE and --file=FILE are handled.

   1 #!/bin/sh
   2 # POSIX
   3 
   4 die() {
   5     printf '%s\n' "$1" >&2
   6     exit 1
   7 }
   8 
   9 # Initialize all the option variables.
  10 # This ensures we are not contaminated by variables from the environment.
  11 file=
  12 verbose=0
  13 
  14 while :; do
  15     case $1 in
  16         -h|-\?|--help)
  17             show_help    # Display a usage synopsis.
  18             exit
  19             ;;
  20         -f|--file)       # Takes an option argument; ensure it has been specified.
  21             if [ "$2" ]; then
  22                 file=$2
  23                 shift
  24             else
  25                 die 'ERROR: "--file" requires a non-empty option argument.'
  26             fi
  27             ;;
  28         --file=?*)
  29             file=${1#*=} # Delete everything up to "=" and assign the remainder.
  30             ;;
  31         --file=)         # Handle the case of an empty --file=
  32             die 'ERROR: "--file" requires a non-empty option argument.'
  33             ;;
  34         -v|--verbose)
  35             verbose=$((verbose + 1))  # Each -v adds 1 to verbosity.
  36             ;;
  37         --)              # End of all options.
  38             shift
  39             break
  40             ;;
  41         -?*)
  42             printf 'WARN: Unknown option (ignored): %s\n' "$1" >&2
  43             ;;
  44         *)               # Default case: No more options, so break out of the loop.
  45             break
  46     esac
  47 
  48     shift
  49 done
  50 
  51 # if --file was provided, open it for writing, else duplicate stdout
  52 if [ "$file" ]; then
  53     exec 3> "$file"
  54 else
  55     exec 3>&1
  56 fi
  57 
  58 # Rest of the program here.
  59 # If there are input files (for example) that follow the options, they
  60 # will remain in the "$@" positional parameters.

This parser does not handle single-letter options concatenated together (like -xvf being understood as -x -v -f). This could be added with effort, but it's left as an exercise for the reader. In practice, it's exceptionally rare for shell scripts that handle long options to handle single-letter option splitting as well. It's simply not worth the effort.

For the most part, shell scripts that you write will not need to worry about single-letter option splitting, because you are the only person using them. Fancy option processing is only desirable if you are releasing the program for general use, and that is almost never going to be the case in real life. Single-letter option combining also precludes the use of Tcl-style long arguments (-foo), which some commands like find(1), gcc(1) and star(1) use.

getopts

The main benefit of getopts is to allow single-letter option splitting (-xvf handled as -x -v -f). The trade-off for this is that you cannot use long arguments of any kind (GNU-style --foo or Tcl-style -foo), or options with an optional argument (like mysql's -p[password] option).

getopts is suitable for simple scripts. The more complex your option parsing needs are, the less likely it is that you'll be able to make use of getopts.

Here is a getopts example:

   1 #!/bin/sh
   2 
   3 # Usage info
   4 show_help() {
   5 cat << EOF
   6 Usage: ${0##*/} [-hv] [-f OUTFILE] [FILE]...
   7 Do stuff with FILE and write the result to standard output. With no FILE
   8 or when FILE is -, read standard input.
   9 
  10     -h          display this help and exit
  11     -f OUTFILE  write the result to OUTFILE instead of standard output.
  12     -v          verbose mode. Can be used multiple times for increased
  13                 verbosity.
  14 EOF
  15 }
  16 
  17 # Initialize our own variables:
  18 output_file=""
  19 verbose=0
  20 
  21 OPTIND=1
  22 # Resetting OPTIND is necessary if getopts was used previously in the script.
  23 # It is a good idea to make OPTIND local if you process options in a function.
  24 
  25 while getopts hvf: opt; do
  26     case $opt in
  27         h)
  28             show_help
  29             exit 0
  30             ;;
  31         v)  verbose=$((verbose+1))
  32             ;;
  33         f)  output_file=$OPTARG
  34             ;;
  35         *)
  36             show_help >&2
  37             exit 1
  38             ;;
  39     esac
  40 done
  41 shift "$((OPTIND-1))"   # Discard the options and sentinel --
  42 
  43 # Everything that's left in "$@" is a non-option.  In our case, a FILE to process.
  44 printf 'verbose=<%d>\noutput_file=<%s>\nLeftovers:\n' "$verbose" "$output_file"
  45 printf '<%s>\n' "$@"
  46 
  47 # End of file

There is a getopts tutorial which explains what all of the syntax and variables mean. In bash, there is also help getopts.

The advantages of getopts over a manual loop:

  1. It can handle things like -xvf filename in the expected Unix way, automatically.

  2. It makes sure options are parsed like any standard command (lowest common denominator), avoiding surprises.
  3. With some implementations, the error messages will be localised in the language of the user.

The disadvantages of getopts:

  1. (Except for ksh93) it can only handle short options (-h, not --help).

  2. It cannot handle options with optional arguments like mysql's -p[password].

  3. It doesn't exist in the Bourne shell.
  4. It only allows options to be parsed in the "standard way" (lowest common denominator).

  5. Options are coded in at least 2, probably 3 places -- in the call to getopts, in the case statement that processes them, and in the help/usage message that documents them.

For other, more complicated ways of option parsing, see ComplexOptionParsing.


CategoryShell

BashFAQ/035 (last edited 2024-02-26 07:51:38 by larryv)