Differences between revisions 8 and 12 (spanning 4 versions)
Revision 8 as of 2009-03-24 08:42:31
Size: 4064
Editor: pgas
Comment: major changes, delegates the bourne shell workarounds, add named pipes, coprocess and here documents
Revision 12 as of 2009-08-18 12:23:29
Size: 4009
Editor: localhost
Comment: Another formatting fix (indent the more-splitting reference)
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 32: Line 32:
   Several possibilities to avoid the subshell exists:
Line 35: Line 33:
* If the input is a file, remove the '''useless use of cat'''
  
Several possibilities to avoid the subshell exist:

 
* If the input is a file, remove the '''useless use of cat''':
Line 38: Line 38:
  #POSIX
  while read -r line;do  linecnt=$((linecnt+1));done < file
  # POSIX
  while read -r line; do linecnt=$(($linecnt+1)); done < file
Line 43: Line 43:
 Unfortunately this does't work with a Bourne shell see [[http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/sh/sh.1.html#20|sh(1) from the Heirloom Bourne Shell]] for a workaround.  Unfortunately this doesn't work with a Bourne shell; see [[http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/sh/sh.1.html#20|sh(1) from the Heirloom Bourne Shell]] for a workaround.
Line 45: Line 45:
* '''Group the commands''' and do it all in the subshell  * '''Group the commands''' and do it all in the subshell:
Line 48: Line 48:
   # POSIX
    linecnt=0
   cat /etc/passwd |
    {
   while read -r line ; do
           linecnt=$((linecnt+1))
        done
   echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"
    }
  # POSIX
  linecnt=0
  cat /etc/passwd |
  {
      while read -r line ; do
         linecnt=$((linecnt+1))
      done
      echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"
  }
Line 59: Line 59:
* Use '''process substitution''' (BASH only)   * Use ProcessSubstitution (BASH only):
Line 71: Line 71:
* Use a '''named pipe''' (POSIX)

 
{{{
 * Use a [[NamedPipes|named pipe]] (POSIX):
 {{{
Line 78: Line 77:
       linecnt=$((linecnt+1))        linecnt=$(($linecnt+1))
Line 83: Line 82:
 For more information see NamedPipes

* Use a '''coprocess''' (ksh, even pdksh, oksh, mksh..)
 * Use a '''coprocess''' (ksh, even pdksh, oksh, mksh..):
Line 87: Line 84:
  #ksh   # ksh
Line 95: Line 92:
* Another useful trick (using Bash/ksh93 syntax) is breaking a variable into words using {{{read}}}:  * Another useful trick (using Bash/ksh93 syntax) is breaking a variable into words using {{{read}}}:
Line 98: Line 95:
   # Bash
   echo "$foo" | read -r a b c # this doesn't work
    read -r a b c <<< "$foo" # but this does
  # Bash
  echo "$foo" | read -r a b c # this doesn't work
  read -r a b c <<< "$foo" # but this does
Line 107: Line 104:
 With a Posix shell you can use a here document instead:  * With a POSIX shell you can use a here document instead:
Line 109: Line 106:
  #Posix
  read -r a b c << EOF
   $foo
   EOF
  # POSIX
  read -r a b c << EOF
  $foo
  EOF

I set variables in a loop. Why do they suddenly disappear after the loop terminates? Or, why can't I pipe data to read?

The problem

In most shells, each command of a pipeline is executed in a separate SubShell.

    # Non-working example (except in ksh88/ksh93)
    linecnt=0
    printf "%s\n" foo bar  | while read -r line
    do
        linecnt=$((linecnt+1))
    done
    echo "total number of lines: $linecnt" # prints 0

    # the problem also occurs without a loop
    var=0
    echo 2 | read -r var
    echo $var # also prints 0

The reason for this surprising behaviour is that a while/for/until loop runs in a SubShell when it's part of a pipeline. For the while loop above, a new subshell with its own copy of the variable linecnt is created (initial value, taken from the parent shell: "0"). This copy then is used for counting. When the while loop is finished, the subshell copy is discarded, and the original variable linecnt of the parent (whose value has not changed) is used in the echo command.

Different shells behave differently when using redirection or pipes with a loop:

  • BourneShell creates a subshell when the input or output of anything (loops, case etc..) but a simple command is redirected, either by using a pipeline or by a redirection operator ('<', '>').

  • BASH creates a new process only if the loop is part of a pipeline

  • KornShell creates it only if the loop is part of a pipeline, but not if the loop is the last part of it. (The example above actually works in ksh88 and ksh93!)

  • POSIX specifies the bash behaviour, but as an extension allows any or all of the parts of the pipeline to run without a subshell (thus permitting the KornShell behaviour, as well).

Workarounds

Several possibilities to avoid the subshell exist:

  • If the input is a file, remove the useless use of cat:

      # POSIX
      while read -r line; do linecnt=$(($linecnt+1)); done < file
      echo $linecnt

    Unfortunately this doesn't work with a Bourne shell; see sh(1) from the Heirloom Bourne Shell for a workaround.

  • Group the commands and do it all in the subshell:

      # POSIX
      linecnt=0
      cat /etc/passwd |
      {
          while read -r line ; do
             linecnt=$((linecnt+1))
          done
          echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"
      }
  • Use ProcessSubstitution (BASH only):

        # Bash
        while read -r line; do
           linecnt=$((linecnt+1))
        done < <(grep PATH /etc/profile)
        echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"

    See also FAQ #1

  • Use a named pipe (POSIX):

       # POSIX
       mkfifo mypipe
       grep PATH /etc/profile > mypipe &
       while read -r line;do
           linecnt=$(($linecnt+1))
       done < mypipe
       echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"
  • Use a coprocess (ksh, even pdksh, oksh, mksh..):

      # ksh
      grep PATH /etc/profile |&
      while read -r -p line; do
        linecnt=$((linecnt+1))
      done
      echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"
  • Another useful trick (using Bash/ksh93 syntax) is breaking a variable into words using read:

      # Bash
      echo "$foo" | read -r a b c      # this doesn't work
      read -r a b c <<< "$foo"         # but this does

    Again, the pipeline causes the read command in the first example to run in a subshell, so its effect is never witnessed in the parent process. The second example does not create any subshells, so it works as we expect. The <<< operator is specific to bash (2.05b and later), and the input which follows it is usually called a "here string".

    For more examples of how to break input into words, see FAQ #1.

  • With a POSIX shell you can use a here document instead:
      # POSIX
      read -r a b c << EOF
      $foo
      EOF

BashFAQ/024 (last edited 2023-12-12 13:15:33 by 195)