Diff for "BashFAQ/024"

I set variables in a loop that's in a pipeline. Why do they disappear after the loop terminates? Or, why can't I pipe data to read?

In most shells, each command of a pipeline is executed in a separate SubShell. Non-working example:

    # Works only in ksh88/ksh93, or bash 4.2 with lastpipe enabled
    # In other shells, this will print 0
    linecount=0

    printf '%s\n' foo bar |
    while read -r line
    do
        linecount=$((linecount + 1))
    done

    echo "total number of lines: $linecount"

The reason for this potentially surprising behaviour, as described above, is that each SubShell introduces a new variable context and environment. The while loop above is executed in a new subshell with its own copy of the variable linecount created with the initial value of '0' taken from the parent shell. This copy then is used for counting. When the while loop is finished, the subshell copy is discarded, and the original variable linecount of the parent (whose value hasn't changed) is used in the echo command.

Different shells exhibit different behaviors in this situation:

• BourneShell creates a subshell when the input or output of anything (loops, case etc..) but a simple command is redirected, either by using a pipeline or by a redirection operator ('<', '>').

• BASH creates a new process only if the loop is part of a pipeline.

• KornShell creates it only if the loop is part of a pipeline, but not if the loop is the last part of it. The read example above actually works in ksh88 and ksh93! (but not mksh)

• POSIX specifies the bash behaviour, but as an extension allows any or all of the parts of the pipeline to run without a subshell (thus permitting the KornShell behaviour, as well).

More broken stuff:

    # Bash 4
    # The problem also occurs without a loop
    printf '%s\n' foo bar | mapfile -t line
    printf 'total number of lines: %s\n' "${#line[@]}" # prints 0

    f() {
        if [[ -t 0 ]]; then
            echo "$1"
        else
            read -r var
        fi
    };

    f 'hello' | f
    echo "$var" # prints nothing

Again, in both cases the pipeline causes read or some containing command to run in a subshell, so its effect is never witnessed in the parent process.

• It should be stressed that this issue isn't specific to loops. It's a general property of all pipes, though the "while/read" loop might be considered the canonical example that crops up over and over when people read the help or manpage description of the read builtin and notice that it accepts data on stdin. They might recall that data redirected into a compound command is available throughout that command, but not understand why all the fancy process substitutions and redirects they run across in places like FAQ #1 are necessary. Naturally they proceed to put their funstuff directly into a pipeline, and confusion ensues.

Workarounds

• If the input is a file, a simple redirect will suffice:

      # POSIX
      while read -r line; do linecount=$((linecount + 1)); done < file
      echo $linecount

  Unfortunately, this doesn't work with a Bourne shell; see sh(1) from the Heirloom Bourne Shell for a workaround.

• Use command grouping and do everything in the subshell:

      # POSIX
      linecount=0
  
      cat /etc/passwd |
      {
          while read -r line
          do
              linecount=$((linecount + 1))
          done
  
          echo "total number of lines: $linecount" ;
      }

  This doesn't really change the subshell situation, but if nothing from the subshell is needed in the rest of your code then destroying the local environment after you're through with it could be just what you want anyway.

• Use ProcessSubstitution (Bash only):

      # Bash
      while read -r line
      do
          ((linecount++))
      done < <(grep PATH /etc/profile)
  
      echo "total number of lines: $linecount"

  This is essentially identical to the first workaround above. We still redirect a file, only this time the file happens to be a named pipe temporarily created by our process substitution to transport the output of grep.

• Use a named pipe:

      # POSIX
      mkfifo mypipe
      grep PATH /etc/profile > mypipe &
  
      while read -r line
      do
          linecount=$((linecount + 1))
      done < mypipe
  
      echo "total number of lines: $linecount"

• Use a coprocess (ksh, even pdksh, oksh, mksh..):

      # ksh
      grep PATH /etc/profile |&
  
      while read -r -p line
      do
          linecount=$((linecount + 1))
      done
  
      echo "total number of lines: $linecount"

  Bash 4 also has coproc, but its syntax is very different from ksh's syntax, and not really applicable for this task.

• Use a HereString (Bash only):

       # Options:
       # -r Backslash does not act as an escape character; \n is not taken as LF.
       # -a The words are assigned to sequential indices of the array "words"
  
       read -ra words <<< 'hi ho hum'
       printf 'total number of words: %d' "${#words[@]}"

  The <<< operator is specific to bash (2.05b and later), however it is a very clean and handy way to specify a small string of literal input to a command.

• With a POSIX shell, or for longer multi-line data, you can use a here document instead:

      # Bash
      declare -i linecount
  
      while read -r; do
          ((linecount++))
      done <<EOF
      hi
      ho
      hum
      EOF
  
      printf 'total number of lines: %d' "$linecount"

• Use lastpipe (Bash 4.2)

       # Bash 4.2
       # +m: Monitor mode (enables job control). Background processes display their
       #     exit status on their completion.
       set +m
       shopt -s lastpipe
  
       printf '%s\n' hi{,,,,,} | while read -r "lines[x++]"; do :; done
       printf 'total number of lines: %d' "${#lines[@]}"

  Bash 4.2 introduces the aforementioned ksh-like behavior to Bash. The one caveat is that job control must not be enabled, thereby limiting its usefulness in an interactive shell.

For more related examples of how to read input and break it into words, see FAQ #1.

CategoryShell