4552
Comment: clean up and expand. add more keywords in the question text to aid recognition that this IS relevant....
|
4009
Another formatting fix (indent the more-splitting reference)
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
[[Anchor(faq24)]] | <<Anchor(faq24)>> |
Line 4: | Line 4: |
The following command always prints "total number of lines: 0", although the variable {{{linecnt}}} has a larger value in the {{{while}}} loop: | === The problem === In most shells, each command of a pipeline is executed in a separate SubShell. |
Line 7: | Line 9: |
# Non-working example (except in ksh88/ksh93) | |
Line 8: | Line 11: |
cat /etc/passwd | while read line | printf "%s\n" foo bar | while read -r line |
Line 10: | Line 13: |
linecnt=`expr $linecnt + 1` | linecnt=$((linecnt+1)) |
Line 12: | Line 15: |
echo "total number of lines: $linecnt" | echo "total number of lines: $linecnt" # prints 0 # the problem also occurs without a loop var=0 echo 2 | read -r var echo $var # also prints 0 |
Line 15: | Line 23: |
The reason for this surprising behaviour is that a {{{while/for/until}}} loop runs in a subshell when it's part of a pipeline. For the {{{while}}} loop above, a new subshell with its own copy of the variable {{{linecnt}}} is created (initial value, taken from the parent shell: "0"). This copy then is used for counting. When the {{{while}}} loop is finished, the subshell copy is discarded, and the original variable {{{linecnt}}} of the parent (whose value has not changed) is used in the {{{echo}}} command. | The reason for this surprising behaviour is that a {{{while/for/until}}} loop runs in a SubShell when it's part of a pipeline. For the {{{while}}} loop above, a new subshell with its own copy of the variable {{{linecnt}}} is created (initial value, taken from the parent shell: "0"). This copy then is used for counting. When the {{{while}}} loop is finished, the subshell copy is discarded, and the original variable {{{linecnt}}} of the parent (whose value has not changed) is used in the {{{echo}}} command. |
Line 18: | Line 26: |
* BourneShell creates a subshell when the input or output of a loop is redirected, either by using a pipeline or by a redirection operator ('<', '>'). * ["BASH"] creates a new process only if the loop is part of a pipeline * KornShell creates it only if the loop is part of a pipeline, but ''not'' if the loop is the last part of it. |
* BourneShell creates a subshell when the input or output of anything (loops, case etc..) but a simple command is redirected, either by using a pipeline or by a redirection operator ('<', '>'). * [[BASH]] creates a new process only if the loop is part of a pipeline * KornShell creates it only if the loop is part of a pipeline, but ''not'' if the loop is the last part of it. (The example above actually ''works'' in ksh88 and ksh93!) * POSIX specifies the bash behaviour, but as an extension allows any or all of the parts of the pipeline to run without a subshell (thus permitting the KornShell behaviour, as well). |
Line 22: | Line 31: |
To solve this, either use a method that works without a subshell, or make sure you do all processing inside that subshell (a bit of a kludge, but often easier to work with): | === Workarounds === |
Line 24: | Line 33: |
{{{ linecnt=0 cat /etc/passwd | ( while read line ; do linecnt="$((linecnt+1))" done echo "total number of lines: $linecnt" ) }}} |
Several possibilities to avoid the subshell exist: |
Line 35: | Line 35: |
To avoid the subshell completely (not easily possible if the other part of the pipe is a command!), use redirection, which does not have this problem (at least for ["BASH"] and KornShell): | * If the input is a file, remove the '''useless use of cat''': |
Line 37: | Line 37: |
{{{ linecnt=0 while read line ; do linecnt="$((linecnt+1))" done < /etc/passwd |
{{{ # POSIX while read -r line; do linecnt=$(($linecnt+1)); done < file echo $linecnt }}} Unfortunately this doesn't work with a Bourne shell; see [[http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/sh/sh.1.html#20|sh(1) from the Heirloom Bourne Shell]] for a workaround. * '''Group the commands''' and do it all in the subshell: {{{ # POSIX linecnt=0 cat /etc/passwd | { while read -r line ; do linecnt=$((linecnt+1)) done echo "total number of lines: $linecnt" } }}} * Use ProcessSubstitution (BASH only): {{{ # Bash while read -r line; do linecnt=$((linecnt+1)) done < <(grep PATH /etc/profile) echo "total number of lines: $linecnt" }}} See also [[BashFAQ/001|FAQ #1]] * Use a [[NamedPipes|named pipe]] (POSIX): {{{ # POSIX mkfifo mypipe grep PATH /etc/profile > mypipe & while read -r line;do linecnt=$(($linecnt+1)) done < mypipe |
Line 43: | Line 80: |
}}} | }}} |
Line 45: | Line 82: |
For ["BASH"], when the input of the pipe is a command rather than a file, you can use ProcessSubstitution: | * Use a '''coprocess''' (ksh, even pdksh, oksh, mksh..): {{{ # ksh grep PATH /etc/profile |& while read -r -p line; do linecnt=$((linecnt+1)) done echo "total number of lines: $linecnt" }}} |
Line 47: | Line 92: |
{{{ while read LINE; do echo "-> $LINE" done < <(grep PATH /etc/profile) }}} |
* Another useful trick (using Bash/ksh93 syntax) is breaking a variable into words using {{{read}}}: |
Line 53: | Line 94: |
If you're reading from a plain file, a portable and common work-around is to redirect the standard input of the script using {{{exec}}}: | {{{ # Bash echo "$foo" | read -r a b c # this doesn't work read -r a b c <<< "$foo" # but this does }}} |
Line 55: | Line 100: |
{{{ linecnt=0 exec < /etc/passwd # redirect standard input from the file /etc/passwd while read line # "read" gets its input from the file /etc/passwd do linecnt=`expr $linecnt + 1` done echo "total number of lines: $linecnt" }}} |
Again, the pipeline causes the {{{read}}} command in the first example to run in a subshell, so its effect is never witnessed in the parent process. The second example does not create any subshells, so it works as we expect. The {{{<<<}}} operator is specific to bash (2.05b and later), and the input which follows it is usually called a "here string". |
Line 65: | Line 102: |
This works as expected, and prints a line count for the file {{{/etc/passwd}}}. But the input is redirected from that file permanently. What if we need to read the original standard input sometime later again? In that case we have to save a copy of the original standard input file descriptor, which we later can restore: | For more examples of how to break input into words, see [[BashFAQ/001|FAQ #1]]. |
Line 67: | Line 104: |
{{{ exec 3<&0 # save original stdin file descriptor 0 as FD 3 exec 0</etc/passwd # redirect stdin from the file /etc/passwd linecnt=0 while read line # "read" gets its input from the file /etc/passwd do linecnt=`expr $linecnt + 1` done exec 0<&3 # restore saved stdin (FD 0) from FD 3 exec 3<&- # close the no-longer-needed FD 3 echo "total number of lines: $linecnt" }}} Subsequent {{{exec}}} commands can be combined into one line, which is interpreted left-to-right: {{{ exec 3<&0 exec 0</etc/passwd _...read redirected standard input..._ exec 0<&3 exec 3<&- }}} is equivalent to {{{ exec 3<&0 0</etc/passwd _...read redirected standard input..._ exec 0<&3 3<&- }}} Another useful trick (using Bash syntax) is breaking a variable into words using {{{read}}}: {{{ echo "$foo" | read a b c # this doesn't work read a b c <<< "$foo" # but this does }}} Again, the pipeline causes the {{{read}}} command in the first example to run in a subshell, so its effect is never witnessed in the parent process. The second example does not create any subshells, so it works as we expect. The {{{<<<}}} operator is specific to bash (2.05b and later), and the input which follows it is usually called a "here string". For more examples of how to break input into words, see [#faq1 FAQ #1]. |
* With a POSIX shell you can use a here document instead: {{{ # POSIX read -r a b c << EOF $foo EOF }}} |
I set variables in a loop. Why do they suddenly disappear after the loop terminates? Or, why can't I pipe data to read?
The problem
In most shells, each command of a pipeline is executed in a separate SubShell.
# Non-working example (except in ksh88/ksh93) linecnt=0 printf "%s\n" foo bar | while read -r line do linecnt=$((linecnt+1)) done echo "total number of lines: $linecnt" # prints 0 # the problem also occurs without a loop var=0 echo 2 | read -r var echo $var # also prints 0
The reason for this surprising behaviour is that a while/for/until loop runs in a SubShell when it's part of a pipeline. For the while loop above, a new subshell with its own copy of the variable linecnt is created (initial value, taken from the parent shell: "0"). This copy then is used for counting. When the while loop is finished, the subshell copy is discarded, and the original variable linecnt of the parent (whose value has not changed) is used in the echo command.
Different shells behave differently when using redirection or pipes with a loop:
BourneShell creates a subshell when the input or output of anything (loops, case etc..) but a simple command is redirected, either by using a pipeline or by a redirection operator ('<', '>').
BASH creates a new process only if the loop is part of a pipeline
KornShell creates it only if the loop is part of a pipeline, but not if the loop is the last part of it. (The example above actually works in ksh88 and ksh93!)
POSIX specifies the bash behaviour, but as an extension allows any or all of the parts of the pipeline to run without a subshell (thus permitting the KornShell behaviour, as well).
Workarounds
Several possibilities to avoid the subshell exist:
If the input is a file, remove the useless use of cat:
# POSIX while read -r line; do linecnt=$(($linecnt+1)); done < file echo $linecnt
Unfortunately this doesn't work with a Bourne shell; see sh(1) from the Heirloom Bourne Shell for a workaround.
Group the commands and do it all in the subshell:
# POSIX linecnt=0 cat /etc/passwd | { while read -r line ; do linecnt=$((linecnt+1)) done echo "total number of lines: $linecnt" }
Use ProcessSubstitution (BASH only):
# Bash while read -r line; do linecnt=$((linecnt+1)) done < <(grep PATH /etc/profile) echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"
See also FAQ #1
Use a named pipe (POSIX):
# POSIX mkfifo mypipe grep PATH /etc/profile > mypipe & while read -r line;do linecnt=$(($linecnt+1)) done < mypipe echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"
Use a coprocess (ksh, even pdksh, oksh, mksh..):
# ksh grep PATH /etc/profile |& while read -r -p line; do linecnt=$((linecnt+1)) done echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"
Another useful trick (using Bash/ksh93 syntax) is breaking a variable into words using read:
# Bash echo "$foo" | read -r a b c # this doesn't work read -r a b c <<< "$foo" # but this does
Again, the pipeline causes the read command in the first example to run in a subshell, so its effect is never witnessed in the parent process. The second example does not create any subshells, so it works as we expect. The <<< operator is specific to bash (2.05b and later), and the input which follows it is usually called a "here string".
For more examples of how to break input into words, see FAQ #1.
- With a POSIX shell you can use a here document instead:
# POSIX read -r a b c << EOF $foo EOF