4236
Comment: No commands inside variables. I'm tempted just to delete that whole example, though.
|
7874
the example output was correct
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 2: | Line 2: |
== How can I store the return value/output of a command in a variable? == | == How can I store the return value and/or output of a command in a variable? == |
Line 7: | Line 7: |
{{{ output=$(command) # stdout only; stderr remains uncaptured output=$(command 2>&1) # both stdout and stderr will be captured |
{{{#!highlight bash output=$(command) # stdout only; stderr remains uncaptured output=$(command 2>&1) # both stdout and stderr will be captured |
Line 14: | Line 14: |
{{{ command status=$? |
{{{#!highlight bash command status=$? |
Line 21: | Line 21: |
{{{ output=$(command) status=$? |
{{{#!highlight bash output=$(command) status=$? |
Line 29: | Line 29: |
{{{ if command; then echo "it succeeded" else echo "it failed" fi |
{{{#!highlight bash if command; then printf "it succeeded\n" else printf "it failed\n" fi |
Line 39: | Line 39: |
{{{ if output=$(command); then echo "it succeeded" |
{{{#!highlight bash if output=$(command); then printf "it succeeded\n" |
Line 45: | Line 45: |
What if you want the exit status of one command from a pipeline? If you want the last command's status, no problem -- it's in `$?` just like before. If you want some other command's status, use the {{{PIPESTATUS}}} array (BASH only). Say you want the exit status of {{{grep}}} in the following: | If you don't understand the difference between ''standard output'' and ''standard error''. here is a brief demonstration. A sane command writes the output that you request to standard output (stdout) and only writes ''errors'' to standard error (stderr). Like so: |
Line 48: | Line 48: |
grep foo somelogfile | head -5 status=${PIPESTATUS[0]} |
$ dig +short A mywiki.wooledge.org 199.231.184.176 $ ip=$(dig +short A mywiki.wooledge.org) $ echo "{$ip}" {199.231.184.176} $ ls no-such-file ls: cannot access 'no-such-file': No such file or directory $ output=$(ls no-such-file) ls: cannot access 'no-such-file': No such file or directory $ echo "{$output}" {} }}} In the example above, `dig` wrote output to stdout, which was captured in the `ip` variable. `ls` encountered an error, so it did ''not'' write anything to stdout. It wrote to stderr, which was ''not'' captured (because we didn't use `2>&1`). The error message appeared directly on the terminal instead. Some commands are ''not'' well-written, however, and may write information to the wrong place. You must keep an eye out for such commands, and work around them when necessary. For example: {{{ $ vers=$(python --version) Python 2.7.13 $ echo "{$vers}" {} }}} Even though we specifically ''asked'' for the version number, `python` wrote it to stderr. Thus, it appeared on the terminal, and was not captured in the `vers` variable. You'd need to use `2>&1` here. What if you want the exit status of one command from a pipeline? If you want the last command's status, no problem -- it's in `$?` just like before. If you want some other command's status, use the {{{PIPESTATUS}}} array (BASH only. In the case of Zsh, it's lower-cased {{{pipestatus}}}). Say you want the exit status of {{{grep}}} in the following: {{{#!highlight bash grep foo somelogfile | head -5 status=${PIPESTATUS[0]} |
Line 54: | Line 84: |
{{{ set -o pipefail if ! grep foo somelogfile | head -5; then echo "uh oh" fi |
{{{#!highlight bash set -o pipefail if ! grep foo somelogfile | head -5; then printf "uh oh\n" fi |
Line 63: | Line 93: |
{{{ output=$(command 2>&1 >/dev/null) # Save stderr, discard stdout. output=$(command 2>&1 >/dev/tty) # Save stderr, send stdout to the terminal. output=$(command 3>&2 2>&1 1>&3-) # Save stderr, send stdout to script's stderr. |
{{{#!highlight bash output=$(command 2>&1 >/dev/null) # Save stderr, discard stdout. output=$(command 2>&1 >/dev/tty) # Save stderr, send stdout to the terminal. output=$(command 3>&2 2>&1 1>&3-) # Save stderr, send stdout to script's stderr. |
Line 68: | Line 98: |
Since the last example may seem a bit confusing, here is the explanation. First, keep in mind that `1>&3-` is equivalent to `1>&3 3>&-`. So it will be easier to analyse the following sequence: `$(... 3>&2 2>&1 1>&3 3>&-)` || Redirection || fd 0 (stdin) || fd 1 (stdout) || fd 2 (stderr) || fd 3 || Description || || initial || /dev/tty || /dev/tty || /dev/tty || || Let's assume this is run in a terminal, so stdin, stdout and stderr are all initially connected to the terminal (tty). || || `$(...)` || /dev/tty || '''pipe''' || /dev/tty || || First, the command substitution is set up. Command's stdout ([[FileDescriptor]] 1) gets captured (by using a pipe internally). Command's stderr (FD 2) still points to its regular place (the script's stderr). || || `3>&2` || /dev/tty || pipe || /dev/tty || '''/dev/tty'''|| Next, FD 3 should point to what FD 2 points to at this very moment, meaning FD 3 will point to the script's stderr ("save stderr in FD 3"). || || `2>&1` || /dev/tty || pipe || '''pipe''' || /dev/tty || Next, FD 2 should point to what FD 1 currently points to, meaning FD 2 will point to stdout. Right now, both FD 2 and FD 1 would be captured. || || `1>&3` || /dev/tty || '''/dev/tty'''|| pipe || /dev/tty || Next, FD 1 should point to what FD 3 currently points to, meaning FD 1 will point to the script's stderr. FD 1 is no longer captured. We have "swapped" FD 1 and FD 2. || || `3>&-` || /dev/tty || /dev/tty || pipe || || Finally, we close FD 3 as it is no longer necessary. || A little note: operation n>&m- is sometimes called moving FD m to FD n. This way what the script writes to FD 2 (normally stderr) will be written to stdout because of the second redirection. What the script writes to FD 1 (normally stdout) will be written to stderr because of the first and third redirections. Stdout and stderr got replaced. Done. |
|
Line 71: | Line 115: |
{{{ exec 3>&1 # Save the place that stdout (1) points to. output=$(command 2>&1 1>&3) # Run command. stderr is captured. exec 3>&- # Close FD #3. |
{{{#!highlight bash exec 3>&1 # Save the place that stdout (1) points to. output=$(command 2>&1 1>&3) # Run command. stderr is captured. exec 3>&- # Close FD #3. |
Line 76: | Line 120: |
# Or this alternative, which captures stderr, letting stdout through: { output=$(command 2>&1 1>&3-) ;} 3>&1 |
# Or this alternative, which captures stderr, letting stdout through: { output=$(command 2>&1 1>&3-) ;} 3>&1 |
Line 85: | Line 129: |
{{{ result=$( { stdout=$(cmd) ; } 2>&1; echo "this line is the separator"; echo "$stdout") var_out=${result#*this line is the separator$'\n'} var_err=${result%$'\n'this line is the separator*} |
{{{#!highlight bash cmd() { curl -s -v http://www.google.fr; } result=$( { stdout=$(cmd) ; } 2>&1 printf "this line is the separator\n" printf "%s\n" "$stdout" ) var_out=${result#*this line is the separator$'\n'} var_err=${result%$'\n'this line is the separator*} |
Line 93: | Line 143: |
{{{ cmd() { curl -s -v http://www.google.fr; } |
{{{#!highlight bash cmd() { curl -s -v http://www.google.fr; } |
Line 96: | Line 146: |
result=$( { stdout=$(cmd); returncode=$?; } 2>&1; echo -n "this is the separator"; echo "$stdout"; exit $returncode) returncode=$? |
result=$( { stdout=$(cmd); returncode=$?; } 2>&1 printf "this is the separator" printf "%s\n" "$stdout" exit "$returncode" ) returncode=$? |
Line 99: | Line 154: |
var_out=${result#*this is the separator} var_err=${result%this is the separator*} |
var_out=${result#*this is the separator} var_err=${result%this is the separator*} |
How can I store the return value and/or output of a command in a variable?
Well, that depends on whether you want to store the command's output (either stdout, or stdout + stderr) or its exit status (0 to 255, with 0 typically meaning "success").
If you want to capture the output, you use command substitution:
If you want the exit status, you use the special parameter $? after running the command:
If you want both:
The assignment to output has no effect on command's exit status, which is still in $?.
If you don't actually want to store the exit status, but simply want to take an action upon success or failure, just use if:
Or if you want to capture stdout as well as taking action on success/failure, without explicitly storing or checking $?:
If you don't understand the difference between standard output and standard error. here is a brief demonstration. A sane command writes the output that you request to standard output (stdout) and only writes errors to standard error (stderr). Like so:
$ dig +short A mywiki.wooledge.org 199.231.184.176 $ ip=$(dig +short A mywiki.wooledge.org) $ echo "{$ip}" {199.231.184.176} $ ls no-such-file ls: cannot access 'no-such-file': No such file or directory $ output=$(ls no-such-file) ls: cannot access 'no-such-file': No such file or directory $ echo "{$output}" {}
In the example above, dig wrote output to stdout, which was captured in the ip variable. ls encountered an error, so it did not write anything to stdout. It wrote to stderr, which was not captured (because we didn't use 2>&1). The error message appeared directly on the terminal instead.
Some commands are not well-written, however, and may write information to the wrong place. You must keep an eye out for such commands, and work around them when necessary. For example:
$ vers=$(python --version) Python 2.7.13 $ echo "{$vers}" {}
Even though we specifically asked for the version number, python wrote it to stderr. Thus, it appeared on the terminal, and was not captured in the vers variable. You'd need to use 2>&1 here.
What if you want the exit status of one command from a pipeline? If you want the last command's status, no problem -- it's in $? just like before. If you want some other command's status, use the PIPESTATUS array (BASH only. In the case of Zsh, it's lower-cased pipestatus). Say you want the exit status of grep in the following:
Bash 3.0 added a pipefail option as well, which can be used if you simply want to take action upon failure of the grep:
Now, some trickier stuff. Let's say you want only the stderr, but not stdout. Well, then first you have to decide where you do want stdout to go:
Since the last example may seem a bit confusing, here is the explanation. First, keep in mind that 1>&3- is equivalent to 1>&3 3>&-. So it will be easier to analyse the following sequence: $(... 3>&2 2>&1 1>&3 3>&-)
Redirection |
fd 0 (stdin) |
fd 1 (stdout) |
fd 2 (stderr) |
fd 3 |
Description |
initial |
/dev/tty |
/dev/tty |
/dev/tty |
|
Let's assume this is run in a terminal, so stdin, stdout and stderr are all initially connected to the terminal (tty). |
$(...) |
/dev/tty |
pipe |
/dev/tty |
|
First, the command substitution is set up. Command's stdout (FileDescriptor 1) gets captured (by using a pipe internally). Command's stderr (FD 2) still points to its regular place (the script's stderr). |
3>&2 |
/dev/tty |
pipe |
/dev/tty |
/dev/tty |
Next, FD 3 should point to what FD 2 points to at this very moment, meaning FD 3 will point to the script's stderr ("save stderr in FD 3"). |
2>&1 |
/dev/tty |
pipe |
pipe |
/dev/tty |
Next, FD 2 should point to what FD 1 currently points to, meaning FD 2 will point to stdout. Right now, both FD 2 and FD 1 would be captured. |
1>&3 |
/dev/tty |
/dev/tty |
pipe |
/dev/tty |
Next, FD 1 should point to what FD 3 currently points to, meaning FD 1 will point to the script's stderr. FD 1 is no longer captured. We have "swapped" FD 1 and FD 2. |
3>&- |
/dev/tty |
/dev/tty |
pipe |
|
Finally, we close FD 3 as it is no longer necessary. |
A little note: operation n>&m- is sometimes called moving FD m to FD n.
This way what the script writes to FD 2 (normally stderr) will be written to stdout because of the second redirection. What the script writes to FD 1 (normally stdout) will be written to stderr because of the first and third redirections. Stdout and stderr got replaced. Done.
It's possible, although considerably harder, to let stdout "fall through" to wherever it would've gone if there hadn't been any redirection. This involves "saving" the current value of stdout, so that it can be used inside the command substitution:
In the last example above, note that 1>&3- duplicates FD 3 and stores a copy in FD 1, and then closes FD 3. It could also be written 1>&3 3>&-.
What you cannot do is capture stdout in one variable, and stderr in another, using only FD redirections. You must use a temporary file (or a named pipe) to achieve that one.
Well, you can use a horrible hack like:
Obviously, this is not robust, because either the standard output or the standard error of the command could contain whatever separator string you employ.
And if you want the exit code of your cmd (here a modification in the case of if the cmd stdout nothing)
Note: the original question read, "How can I store the return value of a command in a variable?" This was, verbatim, an actual question asked in #bash, ambiguity and all.