Differences between revisions 1 and 17 (spanning 16 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2007-05-02 18:48:09
Size: 2281
Editor: redondos
Comment:
Revision 17 as of 2011-03-10 22:38:27
Size: 3403
Editor: pool-72-81-225-126
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Anchor(faq2)]]
== How can I store the return value of a command in a variable? ==
Well, that depends on exactly what you mean by that question. Some people want to store the command's ''output'' (either stdout, or stdout + stderr); and others want to store the command's ''exit status'' (0 to 255, with 0 typically meaning "success").
<<Anchor(faq2)>>
== How can I store the return value/output of a command in a variable? ==
Well, that depends whether you want to store the command's ''output'' (either stdout, or stdout + stderr) or its ''exit status'' (0 to 255, with 0 typically meaning "success").
Line 5: Line 5:
If you want to capture the output: If you want to capture the output, you use [[CommandSubstitution|command substitution]]:
Line 8: Line 8:
    var=$(command) # stdout only; stderr remains uncaptured
    var=$(command 2>&1) # both stdout and stderr will be captured
    output=$(command) # stdout only; stderr remains uncaptured
    output=$(command 2>&1) # both stdout and stderr will be captured
Line 12: Line 12:
If you want the exit status: If you want the exit status, you use the special parameter `$?` after running the command:
Line 16: Line 16:
    var=$?     status=$?
Line 22: Line 22:
    var1=$(command)
    var2=$? # the assignment to var1 has no effect on command's exit status, which is still in $?
    output=$(command)
    status=$?
Line 25: Line 25:
The assignment to {{{output}}} has no effect on {{{command}}}'s exit status, which is still in {{{$?}}}.
Line 26: Line 27:
If you don't ''actually'' want the exit status, but simply want to take an action upon success or failure: If you don't ''actually'' want to store the exit status, but simply want to take an action upon success or failure:
Line 29: Line 30:
    if command
   
then
    if command; then
Line 37: Line 37:
Or (shorter): Or if you want to capture stdout as well as taking action on success/failure, without explicitly storing and checking the exit status:
Line 40: Line 40:
    command && echo "it succeeded" || echo "it failed"     if output=$(command); then
       
echo "it succeeded"
...
Line 47: Line 49:
    result=${PIPESTATUS[0]}     status=${PIPESTATUS[0]}
Line 53: Line 55:
    var=$(command 2>&1 >/dev/null) # Save stderr, discard stdout.
    var=$(command 2>&1 >/dev/tty) # Save stderr, send stdout to the terminal.
    output=$(command 2>&1 >/dev/null) # Save stderr, discard stdout.
    output=$(command 2>&1 >/dev/tty) # Save stderr, send stdout to the terminal.
    output=$(command 3>&2 2>&1 1>&3-) # Save stderr, send stdout to stderr
Line 61: Line 64:
    var=$(command 2>&1 1>&3)    # Run command. stderr is captured.     output=$(command 2>&1 1>&3) # Run command. stderr is captured.
Line 63: Line 66:

    # Or this alternative, which captures stderr, letting stdout through:
    { output=$(command 2>&1 1>&3-) ;} 3>&1
Line 65: Line 71:
In the last example above, note that {{{1>&3-}}} duplicates FD 3 and stores a copy in FD 1, and then closes FD 3.
Line 66: Line 74:

Well, you can use a horrible hack like:
{{{
   result=$( { stdout=$(cmd) ; } 2>&1; echo "this line is the separator"; echo "$stdout")
   var_out=${result#*this line is the separator$'\n'}
   var_err=${result%$'\n'this line is the separator*}
}}}
Obviously, this is not robust, because either the standard output or the standard error of the command could contain whatever separator string you employ.

''Note: the original question read, "How can I store the return value of a command in a variable?" This was, verbatim, an actual question asked in #bash.''

----
CategoryShell

How can I store the return value/output of a command in a variable?

Well, that depends whether you want to store the command's output (either stdout, or stdout + stderr) or its exit status (0 to 255, with 0 typically meaning "success").

If you want to capture the output, you use command substitution:

    output=$(command)      # stdout only; stderr remains uncaptured
    output=$(command 2>&1) # both stdout and stderr will be captured

If you want the exit status, you use the special parameter $? after running the command:

    command
    status=$?

If you want both:

    output=$(command)
    status=$?

The assignment to output has no effect on command's exit status, which is still in $?.

If you don't actually want to store the exit status, but simply want to take an action upon success or failure:

    if command; then
        echo "it succeeded"
    else
        echo "it failed"
    fi

Or if you want to capture stdout as well as taking action on success/failure, without explicitly storing and checking the exit status:

    if output=$(command); then
        echo "it succeeded"
    ...

What if you want the exit status of a command in a few that are piped to each other? Use the PIPESTATUS array (BASH only). Say you want the exit status of grep in the following:

    grep foo somelogfile | head -5
    status=${PIPESTATUS[0]}

Now, some trickier stuff. Let's say you want only the stderr, but not stdout. Well, then first you have to decide where you do want stdout to go:

    output=$(command 2>&1 >/dev/null)  # Save stderr, discard stdout.
    output=$(command 2>&1 >/dev/tty)   # Save stderr, send stdout to the terminal.
    output=$(command 3>&2 2>&1 1>&3-)  # Save stderr, send stdout to stderr

It's possible, although considerably harder, to let stdout "fall through" to wherever it would've gone if there hadn't been any redirection. This involves "saving" the current value of stdout, so that it can be used inside the command substitution:

    exec 3>&1                    # Save the place that stdout (1) points to.
    output=$(command 2>&1 1>&3)  # Run command.  stderr is captured.
    exec 3>&-                    # Close FD #3.

    # Or this alternative, which captures stderr, letting stdout through:
    { output=$(command 2>&1 1>&3-) ;} 3>&1

In the last example above, note that 1>&3- duplicates FD 3 and stores a copy in FD 1, and then closes FD 3.

What you cannot do is capture stdout in one variable, and stderr in another, using only FD redirections. You must use a temporary file to achieve that one.

Well, you can use a horrible hack like:

   result=$( { stdout=$(cmd) ; } 2>&1; echo "this line is the separator"; echo "$stdout")
   var_out=${result#*this line is the separator$'\n'}
   var_err=${result%$'\n'this line is the separator*}

Obviously, this is not robust, because either the standard output or the standard error of the command could contain whatever separator string you employ.

Note: the original question read, "How can I store the return value of a command in a variable?" This was, verbatim, an actual question asked in #bash.


CategoryShell

BashFAQ/002 (last edited 2023-05-11 13:36:34 by emanuele6)