Differences between revisions 9 and 12 (spanning 3 versions)
Revision 9 as of 2009-07-20 20:10:31
Size: 1653
Editor: localhost
Comment:
Revision 12 as of 2010-04-07 19:32:34
Size: 2878
Editor: WillDye
Comment: Typo
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
There are two C programs that can do this: [[http://pilcrow.madison.wi.us/|doalarm]], and [[http://www.porcupine.org/forensics/tct.html|timeout]].  (Compiling them is beyond the scope of this document; suffice it to say, it'll be trivial on GNU/Linux systems, easy on most BSDs, and painful on anything else....) There are two C programs that can do this: [[http://pilcrow.madison.wi.us/|doalarm]], and [[http://www.porcupine.org/forensics/tct.html|timeout]].
Compiling them is beyond the scope of this document,
but it should
be trivial on GNU/Linux systems, easy on most BSDs,
and at least possible (though potentially
painful) on anything else.
Line 5: Line 8:
If you don't have or don't want one of the above two programs, you can use a perl one-liner to set an ALRM and then exec the program you want to run under a time limit. In any case, you must understand what your program does with SIGALRM. In early 2010, a
[[http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commit;h=c403c31e8806b732e1164ef4a206b0eab71bca95|patch]]
was submitted to add a proper
[[http://old.nabble.com/What-signal-should-timeout-send-when-it-gets-a-SIGTERM--ts27814544.html|"--kill-after" option]]
to the "timeout" command in the standard Linux core utilities.
If you have the Linux coreutils version of timeout
(as opposed to the downloaded & compiled "timeout" program mentioned above),
and if your version is new enough to support the "--kill-after" option,
then the coreutils approach is almost certainly your best bet.

If you don't have or don't want one of the above programs, you can use a perl one-liner to set an ALRM and then exec the program you want to run under a time limit. In any case, you must understand what your program does with SIGALRM; programs with periodic updates usually use ALRM for that purpose and update rather than dying when they receive that signal.
Line 22: Line 35:
The shell-script "[[http://www.shelldorado.com/scripts/cmds/timeout|timeout]]" uses the approach above. It has the advantage of working immediately (no need for compiling a program), but has problems e.g. with programs reading standard input. It is possible to do something similar, but to keep `command` in the foreground:

{{{
   bash -c '(sleep 10; kill $$) & exec command'
}}}

`kill $$` would kill the shell, except that `exec` causes the command to take over the shell's PID. It is necessary to use `bash -c` so that the calling shell isn't replaced; in bash 4, it is possible to use a subshell instead:

{{{
   ( cmdpid=$BASHPID; (sleep 10; kill $cmdpid) & exec command )
}}}

The shell-script "[[http://www.shelldorado.com/scripts/cmds/timeout|timeout]]" uses the second approach above. It has the advantage of working immediately (no need for compiling a program), but has problems e.g. with programs reading standard input.

How do I run a command, and have it abort (timeout) after N seconds?

There are two C programs that can do this: doalarm, and timeout. Compiling them is beyond the scope of this document, but it should be trivial on GNU/Linux systems, easy on most BSDs, and at least possible (though potentially painful) on anything else.

In early 2010, a patch was submitted to add a proper "--kill-after" option to the "timeout" command in the standard Linux core utilities. If you have the Linux coreutils version of timeout (as opposed to the downloaded & compiled "timeout" program mentioned above), and if your version is new enough to support the "--kill-after" option, then the coreutils approach is almost certainly your best bet.

If you don't have or don't want one of the above programs, you can use a perl one-liner to set an ALRM and then exec the program you want to run under a time limit. In any case, you must understand what your program does with SIGALRM; programs with periodic updates usually use ALRM for that purpose and update rather than dying when they receive that signal.

doalarm() { perl -e 'alarm shift; exec @ARGV' "$@"; }

doalarm ${NUMBER_OF_SECONDS_BEFORE_ALRMING} program arg arg ...

If you can't or won't install one of these programs (which really should have been included with the basic core Unix utilities 30 years ago!), then the best you can do is an ugly hack like:

   command & pid=$!
   { sleep 10; kill $pid; } &

This will, as you will soon discover, produce quite a mess regardless of whether the timeout condition kicked in or not, if it's run in an interactive shell. Cleaning it up is not something worth my time. Also, it can't be used with any command that requires a foreground terminal, like top.

It is possible to do something similar, but to keep command in the foreground:

   bash -c '(sleep 10; kill $$) & exec command'

kill $$ would kill the shell, except that exec causes the command to take over the shell's PID. It is necessary to use bash -c so that the calling shell isn't replaced; in bash 4, it is possible to use a subshell instead:

   ( cmdpid=$BASHPID; (sleep 10; kill $cmdpid) & exec command )

The shell-script "timeout" uses the second approach above. It has the advantage of working immediately (no need for compiling a program), but has problems e.g. with programs reading standard input.

Just use doalarm or timeout instead. Really.

BashFAQ/068 (last edited 2019-07-25 13:38:08 by GreyCat)