I want to check if [[ $var == foo || $var == bar || $var == more ]] without repeating $var n times.
The portable solution uses case:
# Bourne case $var in foo|bar|more) ... ;; esac
In Bash and ksh, Extended globs can also do this within a [[ command:
# bash/ksh if [[ $var == @(foo|bar|more) ]]; then ... fi
Extended globs are turned on by default inside the [[ command in bash 4.1 and newer. If you need to target an older version of bash, you will need to turn them on in your script (shopt -s extglob outside of all functions or compound commands).
Alternatively, you may loop over a list of patterns, checking each individually.
# bash/ksh93 [[ -v BASH_VERSION ]] && shopt -s extglob # usage: pmatch string pattern [ pattern ... ] function any { [[ -n $1 ]] || return typeset pat match=$1 shift for pat; do [[ $match == $pat ]] && return done return 1 } var='foo bar' if any "$var" '@(bar|baz)' foo\* blarg; then echo 'var matched at least one of the patterns!' fi
For logical conjunction (return true if $var matches all patterns), ksh93 can use the & pattern delimiter.
# ksh93 only [[ $var == @(foo&bar&more) ]] && ...
For shells that support only the ksh88 subset (extglob patterns), you may DeMorganify the logic using the negation sub-pattern operator.
# bash/ksh88/etc... [[ $var == !(!(foo)|!(bar)|!(more)) ]] && ...
But this is quite unclear and not much shorter than just writing out separate expressions for each pattern.