Differences between revisions 2 and 17 (spanning 15 versions)
Revision 2 as of 2007-05-08 19:43:41
Size: 4552
Editor: GreyCat
Comment: clean up and expand. add more keywords in the question text to aid recognition that this IS relevant....
Revision 17 as of 2011-09-10 13:36:37
Size: 5959
Editor: GreyCat
Comment: Fix the top. Make it readable. Also, the top is *special* - there must be NO blank line between the question and the first line, because that's how the main page parses it
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Anchor(faq24)]]
== I set variables in a loop. Why do they suddenly disappear after the loop terminates? Or, why can't I pipe data to read? ==

The following command always prints "total number of lines: 0", although the variable {{{linecnt}}} has a larger value in the {{{while}}} loop:
<<Anchor(faq24)>>
== I set variables in a loop that's in a pipeline. Why do they disappear after the loop terminates? Or, why can't I pipe data to read? ==
In most shells, each command of a pipeline is executed in a separate SubShell. Non-working example:
Line 7: Line 6:
    # Works only in ksh88/ksh93, or bash 4.2 with lastpipe enabled
    # In other shells, this will print 0
Line 8: Line 9:
    cat /etc/passwd | while read line     printf '%s\n' foo bar | while read -r line
Line 10: Line 11:
        linecnt=`expr $linecnt + 1`         linecnt=$((linecnt+1))
Line 15: Line 16:
The reason for this surprising behaviour is that a {{{while/for/until}}} loop runs in a subshell when it's part of a pipeline. For the {{{while}}} loop above, a new subshell with its own copy of the variable {{{linecnt}}} is created (initial value, taken from the parent shell: "0"). This copy then is used for counting. When the {{{while}}} loop is finished, the subshell copy is discarded, and the original variable {{{linecnt}}} of the parent (whose value has not changed) is used in the {{{echo}}} command. The reason for this potentially surprising behaviour, as described above, is that each SubShell introduces a new variable context and environment. The {{{while}}} loop above is executed in a new subshell with its own copy of the variable {{{linecnt}}} created with the initial value of '0' taken from the parent shell. This copy then is used for counting. When the {{{while}}} loop is finished, the subshell copy is discarded, and the original variable {{{linecnt}}} of the parent (whose value hasn't changed) is used in the {{{echo}}} command.
Line 17: Line 18:
Different shells behave differently when using redirection or pipes with a loop:
 * BourneShell creates a subshell when the input or output of a loop is redirected, either by using a pipeline or by a redirection operator ('<', '>').
 * ["BASH"] creates a new process only if the loop is part of a pipeline
 * KornShell creates it only if the loop is part of a pipeline, but ''not'' if the loop is the last part of it.
Different shells exhibit different behaviors in this situation:
 * BourneShell creates a subshell when the input or output of anything (loops, case etc..) but a simple command is redirected, either by using a pipeline or by a redirection operator ('<', '>').
 * [[BASH]] creates a new process only if the loop is part of a pipeline.
 * KornShell creates it only if the loop is part of a pipeline, but ''not'' if the loop is the last part of it. The read example above actually ''works'' in ksh88 and ksh93! (but not mksh)
 * POSIX specifies the bash behaviour, but as an extension allows any or all of the parts of the pipeline to run without a subshell (thus permitting the KornShell behaviour, as well).
Line 22: Line 24:
To solve this, either use a method that works without a subshell, or make sure you do all processing inside that subshell (a bit of a kludge, but often easier to work with): More broken stuff:
{{{
    # Bash 4
    # The problem also occurs without a loop
    printf '%s\n' foo bar | mapfile -t line
    printf 'total number of lines: %s\n' "${#line[@]}" # prints 0
}}}
Line 25: Line 33:
    linecnt=0
    cat /etc/passwd |
    (
        while read line ; do
                linecnt="$((linecnt+1))"
        done
        echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"
    )
    f() {
        if [[ -t 0 ]]; then
            echo "$1"
        else
            read -r var
        fi
    };

    f 'hello' | f
    echo "$var" # prints nothing
Line 35: Line 45:
To avoid the subshell completely (not easily possible if the other part of the pipe is a command!), use redirection, which does not have this problem (at least for ["BASH"] and KornShell): Again, in both cases the pipeline causes {{{read}}} or some containing command to run in a subshell, so its effect is never witnessed in the parent process.
Line 37: Line 47:
{{{  It should be stressed that this issue isn't specific to loops. It's a general property of all pipes, though the "{{{while/read}}}" loop might be considered the canonical example that crops up over and over when people read the help or manpage description of the {{{read}}} builtin and notice that it accepts data on stdin. They might recall that data redirected into a compound command is available throughout that command, but not understand why all the fancy process substitutions and redirects they run across in places like [[BashFAQ/001|FAQ #1]] are necessary. Naturally they proceed to put their funstuff directly into a pipeline, and confusion ensues.

=== Workarounds ===

 * If the input is a file, a simple redirect will suffice:

 {{{
    # POSIX
    while read -r line; do linecnt=$(($linecnt+1)); done < file
    echo $linecnt
 }}}

 Unfortunately, this doesn't work with a Bourne shell; see [[http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/sh/sh.1.html#20|sh(1) from the Heirloom Bourne Shell]] for a workaround.

 * Use [[BashGuide/CompoundCommands#Command_grouping|command grouping]] and do everything in the subshell:

 {{{
    # POSIX
Line 39: Line 66:
    while read line ; do
        linecnt="$((linecnt+1))"
   done < /etc/passwd
   echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"
}}}

For ["BASH"], when the input of the pipe is a command rather than a file, you can use ProcessSubstitution:

{{{
    while read LINE; do
        echo "-> $LINE"
    done < <(grep PATH /etc/profile)
}}}

If you're reading from a plain file, a portable and common work-around is to redirect the standard input of the script using {{{exec}}}:

{{{
    linecnt=0
    exec < /etc/passwd # redirect standard input from the file /etc/passwd
    while read line # "read" gets its input from the file /etc/passwd
    do
        linecnt=`expr $linecnt + 1`
    cat /etc/passwd | {
    while read -r line ; do
        linecnt=$((linecnt+1))
Line 63: Line 71:
}}}     }
 }}}
Line 65: Line 74:
This works as expected, and prints a line count for the file {{{/etc/passwd}}}. But the input is redirected from that file permanently. What if we need to read the original standard input sometime later again? In that case we have to save a copy of the original standard input file descriptor, which we later can restore:  This doesn't really change the subshell situation, but if nothing from the subshell is needed in the rest of your code then destroying the local environment after you're through with it could be just what you want anyway.
Line 67: Line 76:
{{{
    exec 3<&0 # save original stdin file descriptor 0 as FD 3
    exec 0</etc/passwd # redirect stdin from the file /etc/passwd
 * Use ProcessSubstitution (Bash only):
Line 71: Line 78:
    linecnt=0
    while read line # "read" gets its input from the file /etc/passwd
    do
        linecnt=`expr $linecnt + 1`
 {{{
    # Bash
    while read -r line; do
        ((linecnt++))
    done < <(grep PATH /etc/profile)
    echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"
 }}}

 This is essentially identical to the first workaround above. We still redirect a file, only this time the file happens to be a named pipe temporarily created by our process substitution to transport the output of grep.

 * Use a [[NamedPipes|named pipe]]:

 {{{
    # POSIX
    mkfifo mypipe
    grep PATH /etc/profile > mypipe &
    while read -r line;do
        linecnt=$(($linecnt+1))
    done < mypipe
    echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"
 }}}

 * Use a '''coprocess''' (ksh, even pdksh, bash 4, oksh, mksh..):

 {{{
    # ksh
    grep PATH /etc/profile |&
    while read -r -p line; do
        linecnt=$((linecnt+1))
Line 76: Line 108:
    echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"
 }}}
Line 77: Line 111:
    exec 0<&3 # restore saved stdin (FD 0) from FD 3
    exec 3<&- # close the no-longer-needed FD 3
 * Use a HereString (Bash only):
Line 80: Line 113:
    echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"
}}}
 {{{
     read -ra words <<< 'hi ho hum'
     printf 'total number of words: %d' "${#words[@]}"
 }}}
Line 83: Line 118:
Subsequent {{{exec}}} commands can be combined into one line, which is interpreted left-to-right:  The {{{<<<}}} operator is specific to bash (2.05b and later), however it is a very clean and handy way to specify a small string of literal input to a command.
Line 85: Line 120:
{{{
    exec 3<&0
    exec 0</etc/passwd
    _...read redirected standard input..._
    exec 0<&3
    exec 3<&-
}}}
 * With a POSIX shell, or for longer multi-line data, you can use a here document instead:
Line 93: Line 122:
is equivalent to  {{{
    # Bash
    declare -i linecnt
    while read -r; do
        ((linecnt++))
    done <<EOF
    hi
    ho
    hum
    EOF
    printf 'total number of lines: %d' "$linecnt"
 }}}
Line 95: Line 135:
{{{
    exec 3<&0 0</etc/passwd
    _...read redirected standard input..._
    exec 0<&3 3<&-
}}}
 * Use lastpipe (Bash 4.2)
Line 101: Line 137:
Another useful trick (using Bash syntax) is breaking a variable into words using {{{read}}}:  {{{
     # Bash 4.2
     set +m
     shopt -s lastpipe
Line 103: Line 142:
{{{
    echo "$foo" | read a b c # this doesn't work
    read a b c <<< "$foo" # but this does
}}}
     printf '%s\n' hi{,,,,,} | while read -r "lines[x++]"; do :; done
     printf 'total number of lines: %d' "${#lines[@]}"
 }}}
Line 108: Line 146:
Again, the pipeline causes the {{{read}}} command in the first example to run in a subshell, so its effect is never witnessed in the parent process. The second example does not create any subshells, so it works as we expect. The {{{<<<}}} operator is specific to bash (2.05b and later), and the input which follows it is usually called a "here string".  Bash 4.2 introduces the aforementioned ksh-like behavior to Bash. The one caveat is that job control must not be enabled, thereby limiting its usefulness in an interactive shell.
Line 110: Line 148:
For more examples of how to break input into words, see [#faq1 FAQ #1]. For more related examples of how to read input and break it into words, see [[BashFAQ/001|FAQ #1]].

----
CategoryShell

I set variables in a loop that's in a pipeline. Why do they disappear after the loop terminates? Or, why can't I pipe data to read?

In most shells, each command of a pipeline is executed in a separate SubShell. Non-working example:

    # Works only in ksh88/ksh93, or bash 4.2 with lastpipe enabled
    # In other shells, this will print 0
    linecnt=0
    printf '%s\n' foo bar | while read -r line
    do
        linecnt=$((linecnt+1))
    done
    echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"

The reason for this potentially surprising behaviour, as described above, is that each SubShell introduces a new variable context and environment. The while loop above is executed in a new subshell with its own copy of the variable linecnt created with the initial value of '0' taken from the parent shell. This copy then is used for counting. When the while loop is finished, the subshell copy is discarded, and the original variable linecnt of the parent (whose value hasn't changed) is used in the echo command.

Different shells exhibit different behaviors in this situation:

  • BourneShell creates a subshell when the input or output of anything (loops, case etc..) but a simple command is redirected, either by using a pipeline or by a redirection operator ('<', '>').

  • BASH creates a new process only if the loop is part of a pipeline.

  • KornShell creates it only if the loop is part of a pipeline, but not if the loop is the last part of it. The read example above actually works in ksh88 and ksh93! (but not mksh)

  • POSIX specifies the bash behaviour, but as an extension allows any or all of the parts of the pipeline to run without a subshell (thus permitting the KornShell behaviour, as well).

More broken stuff:

    # Bash 4
    # The problem also occurs without a loop
    printf '%s\n' foo bar | mapfile -t line  
    printf 'total number of lines: %s\n' "${#line[@]}" # prints 0

    f() {
        if [[ -t 0 ]]; then
            echo "$1"
        else
            read -r var
        fi
    };

    f 'hello' | f
    echo "$var" # prints nothing

Again, in both cases the pipeline causes read or some containing command to run in a subshell, so its effect is never witnessed in the parent process.

  • It should be stressed that this issue isn't specific to loops. It's a general property of all pipes, though the "while/read" loop might be considered the canonical example that crops up over and over when people read the help or manpage description of the read builtin and notice that it accepts data on stdin. They might recall that data redirected into a compound command is available throughout that command, but not understand why all the fancy process substitutions and redirects they run across in places like FAQ #1 are necessary. Naturally they proceed to put their funstuff directly into a pipeline, and confusion ensues.

Workarounds

  • If the input is a file, a simple redirect will suffice:
        # POSIX
        while read -r line; do linecnt=$(($linecnt+1)); done < file
        echo $linecnt

    Unfortunately, this doesn't work with a Bourne shell; see sh(1) from the Heirloom Bourne Shell for a workaround.

  • Use command grouping and do everything in the subshell:

        # POSIX
        linecnt=0
        cat /etc/passwd | {
        while read -r line ; do
            linecnt=$((linecnt+1))
        done
        echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"
        }
    This doesn't really change the subshell situation, but if nothing from the subshell is needed in the rest of your code then destroying the local environment after you're through with it could be just what you want anyway.
  • Use ProcessSubstitution (Bash only):

        # Bash
        while read -r line; do
            ((linecnt++))
        done < <(grep PATH /etc/profile)
        echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"
    This is essentially identical to the first workaround above. We still redirect a file, only this time the file happens to be a named pipe temporarily created by our process substitution to transport the output of grep.
  • Use a named pipe:

        # POSIX
        mkfifo mypipe
        grep PATH /etc/profile > mypipe &
        while read -r line;do
            linecnt=$(($linecnt+1))
        done < mypipe
        echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"
  • Use a coprocess (ksh, even pdksh, bash 4, oksh, mksh..):

        # ksh
        grep PATH /etc/profile |&
        while read -r -p line; do
            linecnt=$((linecnt+1))
        done
        echo "total number of lines: $linecnt"
  • Use a HereString (Bash only):

         read -ra words <<< 'hi ho hum'
         printf 'total number of words: %d' "${#words[@]}"

    The <<< operator is specific to bash (2.05b and later), however it is a very clean and handy way to specify a small string of literal input to a command.

  • With a POSIX shell, or for longer multi-line data, you can use a here document instead:
        # Bash
        declare -i linecnt
        while read -r; do
            ((linecnt++))
        done <<EOF
        hi
        ho
        hum
        EOF
        printf 'total number of lines: %d' "$linecnt"
  • Use lastpipe (Bash 4.2)
         # Bash 4.2
         set +m
         shopt -s lastpipe
    
         printf '%s\n' hi{,,,,,} | while read -r "lines[x++]"; do :; done
         printf 'total number of lines: %d' "${#lines[@]}"
    Bash 4.2 introduces the aforementioned ksh-like behavior to Bash. The one caveat is that job control must not be enabled, thereby limiting its usefulness in an interactive shell.

For more related examples of how to read input and break it into words, see FAQ #1.


CategoryShell

BashFAQ/024 (last edited 2023-12-12 13:15:33 by 195)