Differences between revisions 33 and 35 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 33 as of 2010-01-21 09:36:25
Size: 7982
Editor: Lhunath
Comment: Add some more info, warnings and clean out dangerous methods.
Revision 35 as of 2010-04-14 21:38:38
Size: 7061
Editor: GreyCat
Comment: More links, simplify/clean up language, remove array-stuffing examples (that's what 005 is for)
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 11: Line 11:
The `-r` option to read prevents backslash interpretation (usually used as a backslash newline pair, to continue over multiple lines). Without this option, any backslashes in the input will be discarded. You should always use the `-r` option with read. The `-r` option to `read` prevents backslash interpretation (usually used as a backslash newline pair, to continue over multiple lines). Without this option, any backslashes in the input will be discarded. You should always use the `-r` option with read.
Line 13: Line 13:
[[BASH]] can also iterate over the lines in a variable using a "here string": `line` is a variable name, chosen by you. You can use any valid shell variable name there.

If your input source is the script's standard input, then you don't need any redirection at all.

If your input source is the contents of a variable/parameter, [[BASH]] can iterate over its lines using a "here string":
Line 20: Line 24:
If your data source is the script's standard input, then you don't need any redirection at all.
Line 22: Line 25:
The same can be done in any Bourne-type shell by using a here
document:
The same can be done in any Bourne-type shell by using a "here document":
Line 42: Line 44:
Note that you can still get the whole line by using {{{$REPLY}}}.

If the field delimiters are not whitespace, you can set {{{IFS}}} (input field separator):
If the field delimiters are not whitespace, you can set [[IFS|IFS (input field separator)]]:
Line 51: Line 51:
For TAB delimited files, use IFS=$'\t'. For TAB delimited files, use [[Quotes|IFS=$'\t']].
Line 59: Line 59:
Line 63: Line 64:
The {{{read}}} command modifies each line read, e.g. by default it removes all leading whitespace characters (blanks, tab characters, ... -- basically any leading characters present in IFS). If that is not desired, the {{{IFS}}} variable has to be cleared:
Some people use the throwaway variable `_` as a "junk variable" to ignore fields. It (or indeed any variable) can also be used more than once in a single `read` command, if we don't care what goes into it:

{{{
    read -r _ _ first middle last _ <<< "$record"

    # Remember, the final _ can absorb any number of fields.
    # It doesn't need to be repeated there.
}}}

The {{{read}}} command modifies each line read, e.g. by default it removes all leading whitespace characters (blanks, tab characters, ... -- any whitespace characters present in [[IFS]]). If that is not desired, the {{{IFS}}} variable has to be cleared:
Line 71: Line 82:
'''Note that reading a file line by line this way is ''very slow'' for large files. Consider using e.g. [[AWK]] instead if you get performance problems.'''
Line 80: Line 90:
This method is especially useful for processing the output of `find` with a block of commands: This method is especially useful for processing the output of [[UsingFind|find]] with a block of commands:
Line 98: Line 108:
Sometimes it's useful to read a file into an [[BashFAQ/005|array]], one array element per line. You can do that with the following example:
Line 100: Line 109:
{{{
    IFS=$'\n' read -r -d $'\0' -a myarray < myfile
}}}
The {{{-d $'\0'}}} option tells read to not stop reading at the first newline, but continue on until the end of the file (or until it sees a NUL byte, which shouldn't appear in text files). We then change the ''Internal Field Separator'' to a newline (only for the {{{read}}} command), so that each line will be considered a new field. Then it populates the array {{{myarray}}}, using these fields as its elements.
If you want to read a file into an [[BashFAQ/005|array]], see [[BashFAQ/005|FAQ 5]].
Line 105: Line 111:
This same trick works on a stream of data as well as a file:

{{{
    IFS=$'\n' read -r -d $'\0' -a myarray < <(find . -type f)
}}}
Of course, this will blow up in your face if the filenames contain newlines; see [[BashFAQ/020|FAQ 20]] for hints on dealing with such filenames.

Since bash will treat sequences of IFS whitespace as a single character, if the input has empty lines (meaning that groups of two or more consecutive \n characters appear in the file), they will be lost. So, for example:

{{{
    $ cat myfile
    line1

    line2
    line3
    $ IFS=$'\n' read -r -d $'\0' -a myarray < myfile
    $ declare -p arr
    declare -a arr='([0]="line1" [1]="line2" [2]="line3")'
}}}

You can deal with this issue by reading the file into an array using a loop:

{{{
    i=0
    while IFS= read -r arr[i++]; do :;done < "$file"
    # or <<< "$var" to iterate over a variable
}}}
On the other hand, if the file lacks a trailing newline (such as {{{/proc/$$/cmdline}}} on Linux), the line will not be printed by a {{{while read ...}}} loop, as {{{read}}} returns a failure that aborts the while loop, thus failing to print the ultimate line. It does, however, store the contents of the partial line in the variable, so you can test whether there was such an unterminated line by checking whether the variable is non-empty at the end of the loop:
If the the input source lacks a trailing newline (such as {{{/proc/$$/cmdline}}} on Linux), the line will not be processed by a {{{while read ...}}} loop, as {{{read}}} returns a failure that aborts the while loop, thus failing to process the last line. It does, however, store the contents of the partial line in the variable, so you can test whether there was such an unterminated line by checking whether the variable is non-empty at the end of the loop:
Line 136: Line 115:
    echo -en 'line 1\ntruncated line 2' | while read -r line; do echo $line; done     printf 'line 1\ntruncated line 2' | while read -r line; do echo $line; done
Line 139: Line 118:
    echo -en 'line 1\ntruncated line 2' | while read -r line; do echo "$line"; done; [[ $line ]] && echo -n "$line"     printf 'line 1\ntruncated line 2' | while read -r line; do echo "$line"; done; [[ $line ]] && echo -n "$line"
Line 142: Line 121:
    echo -en 'line 1\ntruncated line 2' | (while read -r line; do echo "$line"; done; [[ $line ]] && echo "$line")     printf 'line 1\ntruncated line 2' | (while read -r line; do echo "$line"; done; [[ $line ]] && echo "$line")
Line 146: Line 125:
=== Using for instead of while read === === Why you don't use "for" for this ===
Line 155: Line 134:
    $ while read i ; do echo "$i" ; done < afile     $ while read -r i ; do echo "$i" ; done < afile
Line 171: Line 150:
Notice that the syntax to get this right is more verbose. All-in-all, (ab)using {{{for}}} this way is a more dangerous, less intuitive (you don't get what you expect out of a normal {{{for}}}!) and not any more useful method. Notice that the syntax to get this "right" is more verbose. All-in-all, (ab)using {{{for}}} this way is a more dangerous, less intuitive (you don't get what you expect out of a normal {{{for}}}!) and not any more useful method.
Line 173: Line 152:
Also, as discussed in [[BashFAQ/005|FAQ #5]], the use of `IFS=$'\n'` (or any other "whitespace" in `IFS`) causes the shell to consolidate all consecutive instances of the whitespace delimiter into one. In other words, it skips over blank lines. Thus, Also, as discussed in [[BashFAQ/005|FAQ #5]], the use of `IFS=$'\n'` (or any other "whitespace" in `IFS`) causes the shell to consolidate all consecutive instances of the whitespace delimiter into one. In other words, it skips over blank lines. Did you see the blank line in the input file, and how it was missing in the output? It's easier to spot if it's not at the end:
Line 186: Line 165:
If preservation of blank lines is important, just go back to using `while read`. All that setting and unsetting, and we ''still'' couldn't even mimic a simple `cat`. If preservation of blank lines is important, just go back to using `while read`.

How can I read a file (data stream, variable) line-by-line (and/or field-by-field)?

Use a while loop and the read command:

    while read -r line
    do
        echo "$line"
    done < "$file"

The -r option to read prevents backslash interpretation (usually used as a backslash newline pair, to continue over multiple lines). Without this option, any backslashes in the input will be discarded. You should always use the -r option with read.

line is a variable name, chosen by you. You can use any valid shell variable name there.

If your input source is the script's standard input, then you don't need any redirection at all.

If your input source is the contents of a variable/parameter, BASH can iterate over its lines using a "here string":

    while read -r line; do
        echo "$line"
    done <<< "$var"

The same can be done in any Bourne-type shell by using a "here document":

    while read -r line; do
        echo "$line"
    done <<EOF
$var
EOF

If you want to operate on individual fields within each line, you may supply additional variables to read:

    # Input file has 3 columns separated by white space.
    while read -r first_name last_name phone; do
      ...
    done < "$file"

If the field delimiters are not whitespace, you can set IFS (input field separator):

    while IFS=: read -r user pass uid gid gecos home shell; do
      ...
    done < /etc/passwd

For TAB delimited files, use IFS=$'\t'.

Also, please note that you do not necessarily need to know how many fields each line of input contains. If you supply more variables than there are fields, the extra variables will be empty. If you supply fewer, the last variable gets "all the rest" of the fields after the preceding ones are satisfied. For example,

    while read -r first_name last_name junk; do
      ...
    done <<< 'Bob Smith 123 Main Street Elk Grove Iowa 123-555-6789'

    # Inside the loop, first_name will contain "Bob", and
    # last_name will contain "Smith".  The variable "junk" holds
    # everything else.

Some people use the throwaway variable _ as a "junk variable" to ignore fields. It (or indeed any variable) can also be used more than once in a single read command, if we don't care what goes into it:

    read -r _ _ first middle last _ <<< "$record"

    # Remember, the final _ can absorb any number of fields.
    # It doesn't need to be repeated there.

The read command modifies each line read, e.g. by default it removes all leading whitespace characters (blanks, tab characters, ... -- any whitespace characters present in IFS). If that is not desired, the IFS variable has to be cleared:

    while IFS= read -r line
    do
        echo "$line"
    done < "$file"

One may also read from a command instead of a regular file:

    some command | while read -r line; do
       other commands
    done

This method is especially useful for processing the output of find with a block of commands:

    find . -print0 | while IFS= read -r -d $'\0' file; do
        mv "$file" "${file// /_}"
    done

This command reads one filename at a time from the file command and renames the file so that its spaces are replaced by underscores.

Note the usage of -print0 in the find command, which uses NUL bytes as filename delimiters, and -d $'\0' in the read command to instruct it to read all text into the file variable until it finds a NUL byte. By default, find and read delimit their input with newlines; however, since filenames can potentially contain newlines themselves, this default behaviour will split up those filenames with newlines and cause the loop body to fail. Additionally it is necessary to unset IFS, because otherwise read would strip trailing whitespace. See FAQ #20 for more details.

Using a pipe to send find's output into a while loop places the loop in a SubShell and may therefore cause problems later on if the commands inside the body of the loop attempt to set variables which need to be used outside the loop; in that case, see FAQ 24, or use ProcessSubstitution like:

    while read -r line; do
        other commands
    done < <(some command)

If you want to read a file into an array, see FAQ 5.

If the the input source lacks a trailing newline (such as /proc/$$/cmdline on Linux), the line will not be processed by a while read ... loop, as read returns a failure that aborts the while loop, thus failing to process the last line. It does, however, store the contents of the partial line in the variable, so you can test whether there was such an unterminated line by checking whether the variable is non-empty at the end of the loop:

    # This does not work:
    printf 'line 1\ntruncated line 2' | while read -r line; do echo $line; done

    # This does not work either:
    printf 'line 1\ntruncated line 2' | while read -r line; do echo "$line"; done; [[ $line ]] && echo -n "$line"

    # This works:
    printf 'line 1\ntruncated line 2' | (while read -r line; do echo "$line"; done; [[ $line ]] && echo "$line")

For a discussion of why the second example above does not work as expected, see FAQ #24.

Why you don't use "for" for this

Using for instead of while read ... is generally less efficient and suffers a number of unexpected side-effects.

    $ cat afile
    ef gh
    *

    $ while read -r i ; do echo "$i" ; done < afile
    ef gh
    *

    $ for i in $(<afile) ; do echo "$i" ; done
    ef
    gh
    afile
    # the glob was expanded, and it looped per word.

    #workaround:
    $ oIFS=$IFS IFS=$'\n' ;set -f ; for i in $(<afile) ; do echo "$i" ; done; IFS=$oIFS
    ef gh
    *

Notice that the syntax to get this "right" is more verbose. All-in-all, (ab)using for this way is a more dangerous, less intuitive (you don't get what you expect out of a normal for!) and not any more useful method.

Also, as discussed in FAQ #5, the use of IFS=$'\n' (or any other "whitespace" in IFS) causes the shell to consolidate all consecutive instances of the whitespace delimiter into one. In other words, it skips over blank lines. Did you see the blank line in the input file, and how it was missing in the output? It's easier to spot if it's not at the end:

    ~$ cat foo
    line one

    line three
    ~$ IFS=$'\n'; set -f; for line in $(<foo); do echo "$line"; done; unset IFS; set +f
    line one
    line three
    ~$ 

All that setting and unsetting, and we still couldn't even mimic a simple cat. If preservation of blank lines is important, just go back to using while read.


CategoryShell

BashFAQ/001 (last edited 2023-06-28 01:53:29 by larryv)